Advanced search    Help

Clear all search criteria

Only 2/3! You are seeing results from the Public Collection, not the complete Full Collection. Sign in to search everything (see eligibility).

• Border Security: Progress and Challenges in DHS's Efforts to Address High-Risk Travelers and Strengthen Visa Security, Statement of Rebecca Gambler, Director, Homeland Security and Justice, Testimony Before the Task Force on Denying Terrorists Entry into the United States, Committee on Homeland Security, House of Representatives

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Highlights: "DHS seeks to identify and interdict travelers who are potential security threats to the United States, such as foreign fighters and potential terrorists, human traffickers, drug smugglers and otherwise inadmissible persons, at the earliest possible point in time. DHS also adjudicates petitions for certain visa categories and has certain responsibilities for strengthening the security of the visa process, including oversight of VSP [Visa Security Program] and VWP [Visa Waiver Program]. State manages the visa adjudication process for foreign nationals seeking admission to the United States. This statement addresses (1) CBP [Customs and Border Protection] programs aimed at preventing high-risk travelers from boarding U.S.-bound flights; (2) ICE's [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] management of VSP; and (3) DHS's oversight of VWP. This statement is based on prior products GAO [Government Accountability Office] issued from March 2011 through January 2017, along with selected updates conducted in April 2017 to obtain information from DHS on actions it has taken to address prior GAO recommendations. […] GAO previously made recommendations to improve evaluation of CBP's predeparture programs' performance and strengthen DHS's oversight of VSP and VWP. DHS agreed with GAO's recommendations related to CBP's predeparture programs and VWP. DHS did not agree with some of GAO's recommendations related to VSP. GAO has ongoing work related to, among other things, DHS's management and oversight of VSP and plans to report later this year on the results of this work."

  United States. Government Accountability Office

  Gambler, Rebecca

  2017-05-03
• Department f Homeland Security Intelligence and Border Security: Delivering Operational Intelligence: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and Terrorism Risk Assessment of the Committee on Homeland Security, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, Second Session, June 28, 2006

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  Rob Simmons: "The 9/11 Commission estimated that annually approximately 500,000 people enter this country illegally, without inspection, and overstay their legal welcome. Many come for opportunities that America provides, and we understand that, but others have a more sinister intent. In order to better protect our borders, we need to know who is attempting to cross, and what are they bringing into this country, and why. Our border immigration and Coast Guard officials protect more than 5,000 miles of the border with Canada, 1,900 miles of border with Mexico, and approximately 12,400 miles of shoreline east and west. To protect this vast international border, intelligence-driven operations will be the key to targeting and interdicting these threats before their arrival. On a typical day Federal officials will apprehend over 3,000 people trying to cross between ports of entry, and on a typical day will intercept one person for terrorism or national security-related reasons. These apprehensions net fraudulent documents and seemingly innocuous pocket litter, both of which can have tremendous intelligence value. Therefore, DES frontline operators must have the tools, the training, capability and processes in place to weave the information from these everyday encounters into a comprehensive intelligence picture." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Zoe Lofgren, Bennie G. Thompson, Mark E. Souder, Jim Gibbons, Jane Harman, Nita M. Lowey, Charles E. Allen, L. Thomas Bortmes, Cynthia O'Connell, James Sloan, Michael W. Cutler, and Michael O'Hanlon.

  United States. Government Printing Office

  2007
• Pushing the Border out on Alien Smuggling: New Tools and Intelligence Initiatives: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eighth Congress, Second Session, May 18, 2004

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  Serial No. 88: This document provides the transcript of a hearing before the Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims on May 18, 2004, to examine the operations of the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department in deterring and preventing alien smuggling into the United States. The hearing examines new initiatives and proposals that might help "push the border out" in combating alien smuggling on all levels, such as: strengthening the sentencing guidelines for alien smugglers; devoting more resources and officers to uncover and disrupt alien-smuggling networks at source and transit countries; working with foreign law enforcement to do the same; creating a rewards program for informants to provide valuable information to law enforcement about alien-smuggling operations; creating another "S" visa category for alien-smuggling informants; and providing more outreach to the public . Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: John N. Hostettler, Sheila Jackson Lee, Linda T. Sanchez, Joe D. Morton, Robert L. Harris, John P. Torres, Michael W. Cutler, Steve King, and Elton Gallegly.

  United States. Government Printing Office

  2004
• Border Security--2019, Hearing Before the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Sixteenth Congress, First Session, April 4, April 9, June 26, July 17, July 30, and November 13, 2019

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  This is the April 4, April 9, June 26, July 17, July 30 and November 13, 2019 hearings on "Border Security--2019," held before the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. From the opening statement of Gary C. Peters: "I appreciate the Chairman's focus on obtaining accurate, timely data on migration and border security. Certainly, few issues that we face today are as complex as this one or as controversial. Far too often, harmful rhetoric drowns out reasonable dialogue, and I hope that this hearing can cut through that rhetoric and let us focus on the facts. The situation on our Southern Border, in Mexico, and throughout the Northern Triangle is dynamic. [...] The reality is that much of our current infrastructure was built to address the challenges of the 1990s and early last decade when the majority of unauthorized border crossings were single men seeking economic opportunity. That is not what the statistics show us today, and it is not what our staff saw during a bipartisan delegation to the Southern Border last month. Overwhelmingly, they saw families from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. They saw parents with children. They saw children who had made the journey to the border without their parents. They saw our hardworking law enforcement officers, public servants, volunteers, and civic leaders doing their best to manage what is certainly a very difficult situation." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Mark A. Morgan, John Daniel Davidson, Andrew Selee, Rodolfo Karisch, Randy Howe, Timothy Tubbs, Jonathan White, Greg Cherundolo, Brian S. Hastings, Gregory Nevano, Karen Tandy, Jayson Ahern, Leon Fresco, Sharon W. Cooper, Jennifer L. Costello, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Derek N. Benner, and James McHenry.

  United States. Government Publishing Office

  2021
• Statement by Secretary Jeh C. Johnson on the Consequences to Border Security without a DHS Appropriations Bill [February 10, 2015]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  On February 10, 2015, the Department of Homeland Security issued the following press release: "I continue to stress the need for a DHS appropriations bill for FY 2015, unburdened by politically charged amendments that attempt to defund our executive actions on immigration reform. The President has made plain that he will veto a bill that includes such language. At present, the Department of Homeland Security is operating on a continuing resolution that expires on February 27. As long as this Department is funded by a continuing resolution, there are a whole series of activities vital to homeland security and public safety that cannot be undertaken. The public must be aware of the real impacts to homeland security as long as DHS is funded by a continuing resolution, or, still worse, if Congress were to permit our funding to lapse altogether and the Department of Homeland Security goes into government shutdown. Last week I issued a statement noting the impact on DHS's grant-making activity to states, local and tribal governments as long as we are on a CR. Basically, we are prevented from funding all new non-disaster assistance grants. The public must also be aware of the impact on our ability to secure the borders as long as we operate on a CR. As part of our executive actions to reform the immigration system, the President and I have emphasized increased border security. Added border security is also a key component of the President's FY 2015 and FY 2016 budget submissions to Congress. But, as long as this Department is on a CR, and not a full-year appropriations bill, our ability to strengthen border security, to include maintaining the resources we put in place to respond to the surge in illegal migration into south Texas last summer, is constrained."

  United States. Department of Homeland Security. Press Office

  2015-02-10
• Department of Homeland Security: Border Security Status Report: Fourth Quarter, Fiscal Year 2017 (Fiscal Year 2017 Report to Congress)

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "DHS secures our Nation's air, land, and sea borders to prevent illegal activity while facilitating lawful travel and trade. The Department's border security and management efforts focus on three interrelated goals: effectively securing U.S. air, land, and sea borders; safeguarding and streamlining lawful trade and travel; and disrupting and, in coordination with other federal agencies, dismantling transnational criminal and terrorist organizations. DHS has deployed significant levels of personnel, technology, and infrastructure to secure U.S. borders. The integration of intelligence and enforcement capabilities through intergovernmental task forces and partnerships has facilitated better information sharing, leading to the increased interdiction of drugs, weapons, and currency. By focusing on the highest threats and rapidly responding, DHS has strengthened security across the U.S. borders while facilitating international travel and trade."

  United States. Department of Homeland Security

  2018-05-02
• Department of Homeland Security: Border Security Status Report: Third Quarter, Fiscal Year 2017 (Fiscal Year 2017 Report to Congress)

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "DHS secures our Nation's air, land, and sea borders to prevent illegal activity while facilitating lawful travel and trade. The Department's border security and management efforts focus on three interrelated goals: effectively securing U.S. air, land, and sea borders; safeguarding and streamlining lawful trade and travel; and disrupting and, in coordination with other federal agencies, dismantling transnational criminal and terrorist organizations. DHS has deployed significant levels of personnel, technology, and infrastructure to secure U.S. borders. The integration of intelligence and enforcement capabilities through intergovernmental task forces and partnerships has facilitated better information sharing, leading to the increased interdiction of drugs, weapons, and currency. By focusing on the highest threats and rapidly responding, DHS has strengthened security across the U.S. borders while facilitating international travel and trade."

  United States. Department of Homeland Security

  2018-05-02
• Department of Homeland Security: Border Security Status Report: Second Quarter, Fiscal Year 2017 (Fiscal Year 2017 Report to Congress)

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "DHS secures our Nation's air, land, and sea borders to prevent illegal activity while facilitating lawful travel and trade. The Department's border security and management efforts focus on three interrelated goals: effectively securing U.S. air, land, and sea borders; safeguarding and streamlining lawful trade and travel; and disrupting and, in coordination with other federal agencies, dismantling transnational criminal and terrorist organizations. DHS has deployed significant levels of personnel, technology, and infrastructure, to secure U.S. borders. The integration of intelligence and enforcement capabilities through intergovernmental task forces and partnerships has facilitated better information sharing, leading to the increased interdiction of drugs, weapons, and currency. By focusing on the highest threats and rapidly responding, DHS has strengthened security across the U.S. borders while facilitating international travel and trade."

  United States. Department of Homeland Security

  2018-04-17
• H. Rept. 114-10 Part 1: Secure Our Borders First Act of 2015, Report Together with Dissenting Views, To Accompany H.R. 399, Including Cost Estimate of the Congressional Budget Estimate, January 27, 2015

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From "Background and Need for Legislation": "Our homeland security hinges in part on how well we control who and what enters this country. A porous border is a conduit for drug smugglers and human traffickers, and a vulnerability terrorists may exploit. Supporting and overseeing the Department of Homeland Security's efforts to secure the Nation's borders is a principal responsibility of the Congress. Over ten years after the creation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Department still lacks a National strategy to secure the borders or reliable metrics to measure border security progress. Since the attacks of September 11th, 2001, Congress has appropriated billions of dollars to enhance border security, primarily through new investments in personnel, technology, and infrastructure. Despite billions of dollars and decades of policy debates, the border is not secure. Illegal entries into this country continue at an astounding pace, and criminal enterprises have continued to exploit our weaknesses to get drugs, weapons, and other illicit goods into our communities. The Committee believes that operational control must be achieved through smart deployments of technology and infrastructure and progress must be assessed using robust border security performance measures. The required operational plan should be a roadmap to enable the Department to achieve requirements set forth in the legislation."

  United States. Government Publishing Office

  2015-01-27
• Securing the United States-Mexico Border: An On-Going Dilemma

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "Illegal cross-border activity is a severe homeland defense and security problem along the international Southwest border. The issue of illegal human smuggling is not new to the United States-Mexico border, or to law enforcement agencies; however, the phenomenon continues to increase while smugglers adjust to law enforcement tactics. This paper is a synopsis of the thesis entitled 'Modeling the U.S. Border Patrol Tucson Sector for the Deployment and Operations of Border Security Forces' which describes and identifies the fundamental dimensions of U.S. Border Patrol operations in the busiest, most vulnerable section of the border. This paper seeks to provide a comprehensive picture of the complex dynamics along the U.S. Border Patrol Tucson Sector and highlights the primary challenges facing policymakers in developing innovative policies that will minimize illegal cross-border activity and secure the homeland."

  Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Center for Homeland Defense and Security

  Ordóñez, Karina

  2008-05
• Statement by Secretary Jeh C. Johnson Concerning H.R. 399, The Secure Our Border First Act of 2015 [January 22, 2015]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  On January 22, 2015, the Department of Homeland Security issued the following press release: "The 'Secure Our Border First Act of 2015' voted out of the House Homeland Security Committee last night is not a serious effort at legislating border security -- and its authors know it. The bill is extreme to the point of being unworkable; if enacted, it would actually leave the border less secure. The bill sets mandatory and highly prescriptive standards that the Border Patrol itself regards as impossible to achieve, undermines the Department of Homeland Security's capacity to adapt to emerging threats, and politicizes tactical decisions. In the meantime, the bill does nothing to provide what the Department of Homeland Security really needs from Congress -- appropriated funding to pay for vital homeland security initiatives. That includes both the additional resources we put on the border last year, and the additional technology, equipment and other resources we need from Congress to further secure the border. As long as the Department of Homeland Security continues to function on a continuing resolution, as it is now, we are limited in our ability to deploy these critical tools, along with other resources vital to homeland security. Unfortunately, H.R. 399 is unworkable, plain and simple. I again encourage Congress to support the homeland security professionals at this Department with the resources they need, without provisions that would micromanage their work or restrict their flexibility in dealing with the nation's critical homeland security efforts."

  United States. Department of Homeland Security. Press Office

  2015-01-22
• Progress in Implementing New Security Measures Along the Southwest Border [August 30, 2010]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano announced today that Predator Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) flights will begin out of Corpus Christi, Texas, beginning on Wednesday, Sept.1. With the deployment of an UAS in Texas, DHS unmanned aerial capabilities will now cover the Southwest Border--from the El Centro Sector in California all the way to the Gulf of Mexico in Texas--providing critical aerial surveillance assistance to personnel on the ground. The new, border-wide use of the Predator aircraft, comes on the heels of the recently passed Southwest border security supplemental legislation, which will provide two additional UASs that will bolster these newly expanded operations. These UAS efforts are just the latest steps in the historic approach--and unprecedented amount of resources -- that the President and this Administration have directed to the southwest border since launching the Southwest Border Initiative in March 2009. Since then, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has doubled the number of personnel assigned to border enforcement security task forces; tripled the number of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers working along the U.S.-Mexico border; quadrupled deployments of border liaison officers; and begun screening 100 percent of southbound rail shipments for illegal weapons, drugs, and cash."

  United States. Department of Homeland Security. Press Office

  2010-08-30
• Border Patrol: Actions Needed to Improve Oversight of Post-Apprehension Consequences, Report to the Chairman, Committee on Homeland Security, House of Representatives

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "To address smuggling along the U.S. southwest border, the U.S. Border Patrol developed CDS [Consequence Delivery System]--a process to classify each apprehended alien into criminal or noncriminal categories and apply consequences, such as federal prosecution. Each Border Patrol sector ranks up to eight consequences from Most to Least Effective and Efficient to reduce recidivism. GAO [Government Accountability Office] was asked to review and assess Border Patrol's implementation of CDS across the southwest border. This report examines the extent to which Border Patrol (1) has a methodology for calculating recidivism that allows it to assess CDS program effectiveness, (2) applied consequences it determined to be most effective and efficient in each southwest border sector and (3) established guidance and controls to monitor field implementation of CDS. GAO analyzed Border Patrol's recidivism rate methodology; apprehension data and CDS application along the southwest border for fiscal years 2013 through 2015, the most recently available data; and DHS's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement data on alien removals. GAO also interviewed Border Patrol personnel and reviewed CDS guidance. GAO is making six recommendations to strengthen the methodology for measuring recidivism, assess reasons agents do not apply CDS guides' Most Effective and Efficient consequence, and ensure performance management oversight. DHS concurred with all but one recommendation, which relates to strengthening its recidivism methodology, citing other means to measure CDS performance. GAO believes the recommendation remains valid, as discussed in the report."

  United States. Government Accountability Office

  2017-01-12
• Border Security: Summary of Covert Tests and Security Assessments for the Senate Committee on Finance, 2003-2007, Report to the Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "From January 2003 to September 2007, GAO testified before the Committee on three occasions to describe security vulnerabilities that terrorists could exploit to enter the country. GAO's first two testimonies focused on covert testing at ports of entry-the air, sea, and land locations where international travelers can legally enter the United States. In its third testimony, GAO focused on limited security assessments of unmanned and unmonitored border areas between land ports of entry. GAO was asked to summarize the results of covert testing and assessment work for these three testimonies. This report discusses the results of testing at land, sea, and air ports of entry; however, the majority of GAO's work was focused on land ports of entry. The unmanned and unmonitored border areas GAO assessed were defined as locations where the government does not maintain a manned presence 24 hours per day or where there was no apparent monitoring equipment in place. GAO assessed a nonrepresentative selection of these locations and did not attempt to evaluate all potential U.S. border security vulnerabilities. Further, GAO's work was limited in scope and cannot be projected to represent systemic weaknesses. In response to this report, DHS provided a written update on numerous border protection efforts it has taken to enhance border security since 2003. GAO did not attempt to verify the information provided by DHS, but has included the response in this report."

  United States. Government Accountability Office

  2008-05
• Department of Homeland Security: Border Security Status Report: Third Quarter, Fiscal Year 2016 (Fiscal Year 2016 Report to Congress)

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "DHS secures our Nation's air, land, and sea borders to prevent illegal activity while facilitating lawful travel and trade. The Department's border security and management efforts focus on three interrelated goals: effectively securing U.S. air, land, and sea borders; safeguarding and streamlining lawful trade and travel; and disrupting and, in coordination with other federal agencies, dismantling transnational criminal and terrorist organizations. Through the unprecedented deployment of personnel, technology, and infrastructure, the U.S. border never has been more secure. The integration of intelligence and enforcement capabilities through intergovernmental task forces and partnerships has facilitated better information sharing, leading to the increased interdiction of drugs, weapons, and currency. By focusing on the highest threats and rapidly responding, DHS has strengthened security across all U.S. borders while facilitating international travel and trade."

  United States. Department of Homeland Security; U.S. Customs and Border Protection

  2017-04-03
• Department of Homeland Security: Border Security Status Report: First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2018 (Fiscal Year 2018 Report to Congress)

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "DHS secures our Nation's air, land, and sea borders to prevent illegal activity while facilitating lawful travel and trade. The Department's border security and management efforts focus on three interrelated goals: effectively securing U.S. air, land, and sea borders; safeguarding and streamlining lawful trade and travel; and disrupting and, in coordination with other federal agencies, dismantling transnational criminal and terrorist organizations. Through the unprecedented deployment of personnel, technology, and infrastructure, the U.S. borders never have been more secure. The integration of intelligence and enforcement capabilities through intergovernmental task forces and partnerships has facilitated better information sharing, leading to the increased interdiction of drugs, weapons, and currency. By focusing on the largest threats and rapidly responding, DHS has strengthened security across the U.S. borders while facilitating international travel and trade."

  United States. Department of Homeland Security

  2018-08-08
• Department of Homeland Security: Border Security Status Report, Second Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (Fiscal Year 2015 Report to Congress)

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Executive Summary: "DHS secures our Nation's air, land, and sea borders to prevent illegal activity while facilitating lawful travel and trade. The Department's border security and management efforts focus on three interrelated goals: effectively securing U.S. air, land, and sea borders; safeguarding and streamlining lawful trade and travel; and disrupting and, in coordination with other federal agencies, dismantling transnational criminal and terrorist organizations. Through the unprecedented deployment of personnel, technology, and infrastructure, the U.S. border has never been more secure. The integration of intelligence and enforcement capabilities through intergovernmental task forces and partnerships has facilitated better information sharing leading to the increased interdiction of drugs, weapons, and currency. By focusing on the highest threats and responding rapidly, DHS has strengthened security across all U.S. borders while simultaneously facilitating international travel and trade."

  United States. Department of Homeland Security

  2016-07-11
• Department of Homeland Security: Border Security Status Report, First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (Fiscal Year 2015 Report to Congress)

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Executive Summary: "DHS secures our Nation's air, land, and sea borders to prevent illegal activity while facilitating lawful travel and trade. The Department's border security and management efforts focus on three interrelated goals: effectively securing U.S. air, land, and sea borders; safeguarding and streamlining lawful trade and travel; and disrupting and, in coordination with other federal agencies, dismantling transnational criminal and terrorist organizations. Through the unprecedented deployment of personnel, technology, and infrastructure, the U.S. border has never been more secure. The integration of intelligence and enforcement capabilities through intergovernmental task forces and partnerships has facilitated better information sharing leading to the increased interdiction of drugs, weapons, and currency. By focusing on the highest threats and rapidly responding, DHS has strengthened security across all U.S. borders while simultaneously facilitating international travel and trade."

  United States. Department of Homeland Security

  2016-07-06
• Department of Homeland Security: Border Security Status Report, Fourth Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (Fiscal Year 2015 Report to Congress)

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Executive Summary: "DHS secures our Nation's air, land, and sea borders to prevent illegal activity while facilitating lawful travel and trade. The Department's border security and management efforts focus on three interrelated goals: effectively securing U.S. air, land, and sea borders; safeguarding and streamlining lawful trade and travel; and disrupting and, in coordination with other federal agencies, dismantling transnational criminal and terrorist organizations. Through the unprecedented deployment of personnel, technology, and infrastructure, the U.S. border never has been more secure. The integration of intelligence and enforcement capabilities through intergovernmental task forces and partnerships has facilitated better information sharing, leading to the increased interdiction of drugs, weapons, and currency. By focusing on the highest threats and rapidly responding, DHS has strengthened security across all U.S. borders while facilitating international travel and trade."

  United States. Department of Homeland Security

  2016-11-21
• Examining Challenges and Wasted Taxpayer Dollars in Modernizing Border Security IT Systems, Hearing Before the Committee on Homeland Security, Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency, House of Representatives, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, Second Session, February 6, 2014

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  This is from the February 6, 2014 hearing, "Examining Challenges and Wasted Taxpayer Dollars in Modernizing Border Security IT Systems" before the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency of the Committee on Homeland Security. From the opening statement of Jeff Duncan: "Today, we will examine DHS's efforts to modernize key information technology (IT) systems used by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), specifically the TECS modernization program. [...] A legacy system in operation since 1987, TECS has become increasingly difficult and expensive to maintain due to the system's antiquated technology and its inability to support the requirements needed by CBP and ICE personnel in the field. Despite TECS's critical importance to our security, CBP and ICE have failed to manage the modernization program effectively. As the Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently reported, the result has been wasted taxpayer dollars, missed deadlines, and delays in fielding enhancements to CBP officers and ICE agents. [...] With the speed with which technology advances today, it shouldn't take DHS eight years to complete an IT project. Private sector CEOs likely wouldn't tolerate such poor performance and management. Neither should DHS. It's an affront to the American taxpayer and it's time DHS do better." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Jeff Duncan, David A. Powner, Charles R. Armstrong, and Thomas P. Michelli.

  United States. Government Printing Office

  2014
• Border Security: Immigration Enforcement Between Ports of Entry [May 3, 2013]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "Border enforcement is a core element of the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS's) effort to control illegal migration, with the U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) within the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) as the lead agency along most of the border. Border enforcement has been an ongoing subject of congressional interest since the 1970s, when illegal immigration to the United States first registered as a serious national problem; and border security has received additional attention in the decade following the terrorist attacks of 2001. Since the 1990s, migration control at the border has been guided by a strategy of 'prevention through deterrence'--the idea that the concentration of personnel, infrastructure, and surveillance technology along heavily trafficked regions of the border will discourage unauthorized aliens from attempting to enter the United States. Since 2005, CBP has attempted to discourage repeat entries and disrupt migrant smuggling networks by imposing tougher penalties against certain unauthorized aliens, a set of policies known as 'enforcement with consequences.'"

  Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service

  Rosenblum, Marc R.

  2013-05-03
• Border Security: Immigration Enforcement Between Ports of Entry [January 06, 2012]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "Border enforcement is a core element of the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS's) effort to control illegal migration, with the U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) within the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) as the lead agency along most of the border. Border enforcement has been an ongoing subject of congressional interest since the 1970s, when illegal immigration to the United States first registered as a serious national problem; and border security has received additional attention in the decade following the terrorist attacks of 2001. Since the 1990s, migration control at the border has been guided by a strategy of 'prevention through deterrence'--the idea that the concentration of personnel, infrastructure, and surveillance technology along heavily trafficked regions of the border will discourage unauthorized aliens from attempting to enter the United States. Since 2005, CBP has attempted to discourage repeat entries and disrupt migrant smuggling networks by imposing tougher penalties against certain unauthorized aliens, a set of policies known as 'enforcement with consequences.'"

  Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service

  Rosenblum, Marc R.

  2012-01-06
• New Approach to Increase Trade and Security: An Examination of CBP's Public and Private Partnerships, Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security of the Committee on Homeland Security, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourteenth Congress, First Session, November 4, 2015

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  This is a testimony compilation of the November 4, 2015 hearing "A New Approach to Increase Trade and Security: An Examination of CBP's Public and Private Partnerships," held before the House Committee on Homeland Security. From the opening statement of subcommittee chairman Candice Miller: "The commerce that moves through the nation's ports of entry powers our economy, drives job creation and is fundamental to our way of life. If ports of entry shut down, or traffic is backed up -- millions of dollars may be lost, economic growth comes to an abrupt halt, travelers find other destinations to visit, and would-be customs revenue destined for the U.S. Treasury goes away. Despite the importance of ports of entry to the nation's economic health, port of entry modernization efforts have been significantly underfunded, and Customs and Border Protection [CBP] staffing has not kept pace with growing demand. While CBP is frequently asked to provide new or additional service at ports of entry across the country, CBP is often unable to accommodate these requests due to staffing shortages and other resource constraints. Over the past few years this Congress has appropriated more than $2 billion dollars for port of entry construction, but that is dwarfed by the estimated $ 4-6 billion dollars needed to fully modernize our ports of entry. Air passenger volumes are growing at a rate of 4 to 5 percent a year, the nation has experienced a 24% increase in cargo containers since the dark days of the Great Recession, and more cars and trucks transit the land ports of entry than ever before. We are falling further behind every year to match the demands placed on our CBP officers and infrastructure." Statements, letters, and other materials submitted for the record include those of the following: John Wagner, Michael Gelber, Sam F. Vale, and David A. Garcia.

  United States. Congress. House. Committee on Homeland Security

  2015-11-04
• Solving the OTM Undocumented Alien Problem: Expedited Removal for Apprehensions along the U.S. Border: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Economic Security, Infrastructure Protection, and Cybersecurity of the Committee on Homeland Security, House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, First Session, September 28, 2005

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the opening statement of Daniel Lungren: "The subcommittee is meeting today to hear testimony on how the expedited removal program will enhance DHS's capabilities to detain and remove non-Mexican aliens from the U.S… We are here today to ensure that the appropriate resources and training exist within and across those agencies that are tasked with this important mission. Not only does the Border Patrol need to expand the use of expedited removal procedures, but there must also be adequate detention space to hold those who are apprehended. Necessary country clearances and travel documents must be obtained in a timelier fashion so that those undocumented aliens may be returned to their home countries more expeditiously…At a time in our nation's history when there are terrorists who wish to infiltrate our borders for the purpose of inflicting harm on any American, our own policies have created a system that apparently encourages more undocumented aliens to enter the U.S. illegally. It is my belief that it is this system of border security that the president intended us to reexamine in the post-9/11 world. It is also my belief that this system of border security allows potential terrorists to enter the U.S. between our ports of entry and slip into our society undetected, especially as we harden other legitimate means of entry." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Daniel E. Lungren, Loretta Sanchez, Mark E. Souder, David V. Aguilar, Daniel W. Fisk, John Torres, and Sheila Jackson-Lee.

  United States. Government Printing Office

  2007
• Assessment of Risks at the Northern Border and the Infrastructure Necessary to Address Those Risks: Joint Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Economic Security, Infrastructure, Protection, and Cybersecurity Joint with the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Science and Technology of the Committee on Homeland Security, House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, Second Session, August 8, 2006

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the opening statement of Dan Lungren: "As many of you may know, the issue of border security, the issue of immigration, the issue of the threat of terrorism and its implications for both of those first two subjects has garnered a lot of attention in the Congress and throughout the country. There are a number of hearings being held around the country on these subjects. Our Subcommittees believed it was important for us to ensure that the northern border not be left out, that we have an opportunity to look at the unique circumstances that we find on our northern border, that we understand in all of its facets the seriousness of attending to the issue of securing our border on the north, and at the same time trying to understand even better the relationship that exists between our country and our neighbors to the north and attempt to come up with solutions to the problems that are presented without, as we suggested, unduly interfering with the steady flow of commerce with our northern neighbors." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Daniel E. Lungren, Loretta Sanchez, Marks Asmundson, Norman D. Dicks, Sheila Jackson-Lee, Dave G. Reichert, Thomas Hardy, Ronald Henley, Timothy J. Lowenberg, Dale Brandland, Martin Collacott, David B. Harris, Gregory Johnson, K. Jack Riley, Donald J. Alper, Maria Cantwell, Rick Larsen, Davis S. McEachran.

  United States. Government Printing Office

  2007
• Border Security: Additional Actions Needed to Better Ensure a Coordinated Federal Response to Illegal Activity on Federal Lands, Report to Congressional Requesters

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "Federal and tribal lands on the U.S. borders with Canada and Mexico are vulnerable to illegal cross-border activity. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)--through its U.S. Customs and Border Protection's Office of Border Patrol (Border Patrol)--is responsible for securing these lands, while the Departments of the Interior (DOI) and Agriculture (USDA) manage natural resources and protect the public. GAO [Government Accountability Office] was asked to examine the extent that (1) border security threats have changed on federal lands; (2) federal agencies operating on these lands have shared threat information and communications; and (3) federal agencies have coordinated budgets, resources, and strategies. GAO reviewed interagency agreements and threat assessments; analyzed enforcement data from 2007 through 2009; and interviewed officials at headquarters and two Border Patrol sectors selected due to high volume of illegal cross-border activity (Tucson) and limited ability to detect this activity (Spokane). GAO's observations cannot be generalized to all sectors but provide insights. This is a public version of a sensitive report that GAO issued in October 2010. Information that DHS deemed sensitive has been redacted. […] GAO is recommending that DOI and USDA determine if more guidance is needed for federal land closures, and that DHS, DOI, and USDA further implement interagency agreements. DHS, DOI, and USDA concurred with the recommendations."

  United States. Government Accountability Office

  2010-11-18
• Serial No. 110-73: Next Generation Border and Maritime Security Technologies: H.R. 3916, Hearing before the Subcommittee on Technology and Innovation, Committee on Science and Technology, House of Representatives, One Hundred Tenth Congress, First Session, November 15, 2007

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "On Thursday, November 15, 2007, the Committee on Science and Technology's Subcommittee on Technology and Innovation will hold a hearing to discuss H.R. 3916 and examine the current and future priorities in border and maritime security research, development, and technology for the Department of Homeland Security's Science and Technology Directorate (DHS S&T). […] The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) processes approximately 1.18 million people entering the United States through established ports of entry every day. CBP is also responsible for monitoring between legal entry points along the Northern and Southern borders and intercepting individuals attempting to cross the border. Border patrol officers also act as first responders, rescuing individuals in danger from extreme weather or violent situations at illegal entry points. Surveillance technology acts as a 'force multiplier,' which allows border patrol agents to augment their patrols with ground based and aerial observation capabilities. Examples of currently in-use security technologies include infrared sensors, automated cameras, and seismic sensors to detect motion, as well as air based observational equipment to monitor a large area. Many promising technologies are still not feasible for full implementation along the border because of numerous barriers: high cost, lack of robustness in harsh conditions, lack of personnel trained to properly use high-tech equipment, and technical problems. DHS S&T has primary responsibility for bringing new technologies to full readiness, with support from other agencies such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which provides testing and validation services." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Bart Gordon, Ralph M. Hall, David Wu, Phil Gingrey, Harry E. Mitchell, Robert R. Hooks, Ervin Kapos, Brian A. Jackson, and Jeff Self.

  United States. Government Printing Office

  2008
• Transforming the Southern Border: Providing Security & Prosperity in the Post 9/11 World

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "In the decades leading up to September 11, 2001, protecting U.S. land borders was not viewed as a national security issue. It was either a drug or crime or immigration problem, but not one rising to the level of national security. Accordingly, during this time, many critical problems which had been previously identified by border communities, industry groups, the Government Accountability Office (GAO), academics as well as congressional committees were largely ignored. Issues such as deteriorating infrastructure, inadequate facilities, insufficient staffing, stove-piped organizations, poor intelligence and dysfunctional immigration laws were repeatedly identified but never adequately addressed. Since 9/11, this has changed. Significant attention has once again been focused upon our borders in general, and specifically the nation's 7,000 mile-long land borders. The specter of terrorists crossing our land borders to attack our homeland is now a justifiable concern especially in light of a growing number of instances of terrorists or suspected terrorists being caught crossing our land borders. This report demonstrates that, even three years after the 9/11 attacks, our Southern Border is still porous and ripe for exploitation by terrorists seeking to enter the United States. Our national security depends on making this border more secure to prevent terrorists from entering the United States."

  United States. Congress. House. Select Committee on Homeland Security

  Turner, Jim, 1946-

  2004-09
• Shared Compromise - Future US-Mexican Border Security Initiatives

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the thesis abstract: "Following the passing of the unilateral Secure Fence Act of 2006 and the continuous increase of violence in the southwest border region, the U.S. and Mexican populaces highlight the lack of success and question what concrete initiatives the United States and Mexico can undertake to continue to improve the security of the border region. This paper compares the Southwest Border Initiative and the future Merida Initiative (Beyond Merida) as available options to improve border security and subsequently U.S.-Mexico relations. The paper thus illustrates the aims, cost and impact of the three major imperatives encompassed by the Southwest Borders Initiative to illustrate its applicability to current and future border security. After identifying the best future option, the author provides recommendations as the U.S. administration plans for and initiates future southwest border initiatives. Finally, the paper draws conclusions concerning options to posit that the Southwest Borders Initiative will deliver the best long-term results."

  Naval War College (U.S.)

  Cook, Brian C.

  2011-10-27
• Protecting Our Northern Border: Enhancing Collaboration and Building Local Partnerships, Hearing Before the Subcommittee on the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Federal Programs and the Federal Workforce of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, First Session, July 12, 2013

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  This is the July 12, 2013 hearing, "Protecting Our Northern Border: Enhancing Collaboration and Building Local Partnerships," Hearing Before the Subcommittee on the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Federal Programs and the Federal Workforce of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, United States Senate. From the opening statement of Senator Tester, "When the topic of border security arises in Washington, DC, it is the Southwest border that gets most of the attention. Well, like most folks in this room, I happen to live within 100 miles of the Northern border and have my entire life. And we will continue doing all that we can to ensure that the needs up here are addressed when we start talking about border security. After all our Northern border with Canada is the longest shared border in the world, some 5,500 miles, including 545 miles in this State alone. And I do not need to tell you that, when patrolling in an area that expansive, manpower is an answer, but it is not the only answer. It is about deployment of effective technologies. It is about Federal, State, local and Canadian partners working closely and collaboratively. And today we would like to discuss some of the things that we are doing right, and we would like to identify some of our opportunities to improve the things that we can do better. After all this is just not a security issue. It is an economic issue. It is a jobs issue. And I know how much cross-border commerce means to our State and especially to this community of Havre. There's certainly a way to promote smart and effect." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Don Brostrom, Nathan Burr, Debbie Vandeberg, Kumar C. Kibble, Christopher Richards, and Robert Desrosier.

  United States. Government Publishing Office

  2015