Advanced search Help
Searching for terms: EXACT: "United States. Joint Forces Command" in: publisher
Clear all search criteria
Only 2/3! You are seeing results from the Public Collection, not the complete Full Collection. Sign in to search everything (see eligibility).
-
Irregular Adversaries and Hybrid Threats: An Assessment-2011
"Without a true understanding of the national security threats facing our nation, we have little hope of effectively countering them. This assessment of our irregular adversaries and the hybrid threats they pose seeks to provide this common understanding, as the rise of certain nonstate actors and their benefactors as a malevolent force on the global stage is undeniable. It is not an all-inclusive, comprehensive document or an intelligence community assessment; it was developed to increase civilian and military students' awareness of irregular adversaries and the hybrid threat problem set. Put simply, America's most-likely and most-lethal enemies for the foreseeable future are adaptive, ruthless, networked, and committed. These adversaries seek to foster conditions of fear, uncertainty, and instability. Ranging from violent extremist organizations to insurgencies to criminal networks and potent, adaptive mixes of each, these enemies are unrestrained by international laws or norms of behavior and will flow to areas of vulnerability or weakness. Lastly, some of these enemies will also be supported by nation-states that wish us ill."
United States. Joint Forces Command
2011
-
Program Element Analysis
"The successful management of large portfolios of C2 [Command and Control] systems and applications requires an understanding of programmatic data. The ability to extract and clarify programmatic data related to specific C2 systems or groups of C2 systems and codified as Program Elements (PEs) is complementary to any functional or capabilities-based C2 analysis. PEs are the basic components or building blocks of the Future Years Defense Plan (FYDP) containing all funding documentation. Analyzing PEs through repeatable analytic methods allows resource managers to better focus attention toward essential programs and associated funding lines. Further methodologies that can help develop fundamental programmatic baselines and accurately apply a tangible measurement of the alignment of PEs to specific focus areas provide critical assistance when making programmatic recommendations for Periodic Review (PR) and Program Objective Memorandum (POM) cycles. This paper discusses the general application of the PE analysis methodology as well as the specific application of the methodology to a test case. It covers several successful applications of the methodology as well as the challenges encountered and refinements to the original alignment processes. Methodology strengths and weaknesses are discussed, as well as possible venues for improvement before concluding with a proposed way ahead."
United States. Joint Forces Command
Porter, James R.; Byrd, Laura T.; Perretta, David A. . . .
2010-06
-
Handbook for Military Support to Economic Stabilization: Unified Action Handbook Series, Book Four
"This Handbook for Military Support to Economic Stabilization provides established and evolving techniques and procedures used by joint force commanders (JFCs) and their staffs in planning, executing, and assessing joint force support to economic stabilization during post-conflict conditions. This handbook's primary purpose is to provide the JFC and staff with a common, practical baseline of 'best practices' and inform doctrine writers, educators, and trainers about joint force support to civilian-led economic stabilization. It also may serve as a bridge between current practices in the field and their migration into doctrine."
United States. Joint Forces Command
2010-02-27
-
Joint Operating Environment 2010
"The Joint Operating Environment is intended to inform joint concept development and experimentation throughout the Department of Defense. It provides a perspective on future trends, shocks, contexts, and implications for future joint force commanders and other leaders and professionals in the national security field. This document is speculative in nature and does not suppose to predict what will happen in the next twenty-five years. Rather, it is intended to serve as a starting point for discussions about the future security environment at the operational level of war. The next quarter century will challenge U.S. joint forces with threats and opportunities ranging from regular and irregular wars in remote lands, to relief and reconstruction in crisis zones, to cooperative engagement in the global commons. Our enemy's capabilities will range from explosive vests worn by suicide bombers to long-range precision-guided cyber, space, and missile attacks. The threat of mass destruction-from nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons-will likely expand from stable nationstates to less stable states and even non-state networks. It is impossible to predict precisely how challenges will emerge and what form they might take. Nevertheless, it is absolutely vital to try to frame the strategic and operational contexts of the future, in order to glimpse the possible environments where political and military leaders will work and where they might employ joint forces. The value of such efforts lies not as much in the final product, but much more in the participation of senior leaders and decision-makers in the discussion."
United States. Joint Forces Command
2010-02-18
-
Handbook for Military Participation in the Interagency Management System for Reconstruction and Stabilization: Unified Action Handbook Series, Book One
This Handbook for Military Participation in the Interagency Management System for Reconstruction and Stabilization provides fundamental guidance and information for joint force participation in the Interagency Management System (IMS) in support of United States Government (USG) reconstruction and stabilization operations. This handbook is intended to be used as a guide to help explain the roles and responsibilities of military participation within the IMS to better integrate all elements of national capacity in response to an overseas contingency or in support of military engagement, security cooperation, and deterrence activities. Its primary purpose is to better prepare military planners and implementers for interaction, coordination, and communication with IMS participants through the identification of key interagency relationships and standardization of basic processes. It also is designed as a companion document to the IMS Guide and the Practitioner's Guide of the USG Planning Framework for Reconstruction, Stabilization, and Conflict Transformation. Both of these documents will be produced by the Department of State Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization (S/CRS)."
United States. Joint Forces Command
2010-02-17
-
Handbook for Military Support to Governance, Elections, and Media: Unified Action Handbook Series, Book Three
"This Handbook for Military Support to Governance, Elections, and Media provides fundamental guidance, planning considerations, techniques, procedures, and other information for the restoration of a country's governance, elections, and media institutions and processes during the post-conflict1 period (e.g., post-civil war; Phase IV, 'Stabilize,' of a major operation). This handbook is not intended to stand alone as a planning guide, but instead to complement the planning that would be required to better integrate all elements of national capacity in response to an overseas contingency or in support of military engagement, security cooperation, and deterrence activities. Its primary purpose is to aid US joint military planners on a joint force staff to more fully understand their roles and tasks in building or restoring a failed government in the immediate post-conflict period. It is designed to help lay the groundwork for a successful transition between military and civilian authorities in situations where the armed forces for whatever reason find themselves as the de facto governing authority responsible for providing or establishing governance."
United States. Joint Forces Command
2010-02-11
-
Handbook for Military Support to Essential Services and Critical Infrastructure: Unified Action Handbook Series, Book Two
"This Handbook for Military Support to Essential Services and Critical Infrastructure provides fundamental guidance, planning considerations, techniques, and procedures for the development of essential services and critical infrastructure (ES&CI) during Phase 0, 'Shaping' operations or restoration of ES&CI in the wake of a natural disaster or combat during joint operation phases IV, 'Stabilize,' and V, 'Enable Civil Authority.' This handbook is not intended to stand alone as a planning guide, but instead to complement the planning that would be required to better integrate all elements of national capacity in response to an overseas contingency or in support of military engagement, security cooperation, and deterrence activities. Its primary purpose is to provide guidance for joint force commanders and military planners during the post-conflict period, since the military likely will continue to contribute to ES&CI restoration throughout the post-conflict period. It is designed to help lay the groundwork for a successful transition between military and civilian authorities in situations where the armed forces for whatever reason find themselves as the de facto governing authority responsible for providing essential governmental services for a civilian population. It is titled to emphasize that although infrastructure projects provide visible evidence of progress and represent a straightforward engineering problem, their larger purpose is to support delivery of some particular governmental or community-wide service."
United States. Joint Forces Command
2010-02-02
-
Unmanned Effects (UFX): Taking the Human out of the Loop
"The purpose of Project Alpha is to discover, explore, and accelerate good ideas across the Department of Defense (DOD). The good ideas are selected and vetted for their potential to assist in the USJFCOM [United States Joint Forces Command]-charted mission to experiment with transformation of the future joint force. Unmanned Effects is one of those candidate ideas. The purpose of this Rapid Assessment Process (RAP) report is to document the advances in robotics and urge early adoption of robotic concepts. This report discusses the feasibility of employing autonomous robotic forces (called Tactical Autonomous Combatants or TACs in this paper) for a variety of military applications. In the following pages you will read about three imperatives for transforming to a future joint force that is significantly robotic. You will also read about technological advances that can change the fundamental way wars are fought. We believe it is not so much a question of if this transformation will happen, but one of when, by whom and how efficiently. Project Alpha team members believe that the introduction of unmanned entities into the battlespace promises to have a greater impact on future conflict than any other technological innovation to date. Our research has convinced us that unmanned entities will provide significant new capabilities to the forces, and that the capabilities will be available sooner, rather than later -- if decisions are made to pursue the robotic course."
United States. Joint Forces Command. Joint Concept Development and Experimentation Directorate
Johnson, Gordon
2009-09
-
Irregular Warfare Vision
This vision statement "provides guidance on how USJFCOM [United States Joint Forces Command] will respond to the threats posed by irregular adversaries. The vision prioritizes specific efforts necessary to achieve the objectives and guidance of the Department of Defense directive on irregular warfare. [...]. The vision outlines a timeline and expectations from directorates and subordinate commands. Over the next six to 12 months the command will focus its IW efforts in concept development and experimentation, capability development/joint integration and interoperability, training and education, joint provision/global force management and external engagement. Several areas of effort include: Work closely with U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) and the services to update the IW Joint Operating Concept to improve its relevance and utility to the general purpose force, interagency and our multinational partners; standardize and optimize network enabled capabilities and services provided by DoD's Global Information Grid computer network in support of small units at the tactical edge conducting IW; develop joint doctrine that guides and enables joint force commanders to plan and execute IW across the four categories of military activity: combat, security, engagement, relief and reconstruction; identify tracking requirements for critical skills and experiences relevant to IW; capture, analyze and disseminate IW lessons learned and best practices. The vision states USJFCOM will work with its partners to identify the most important challenges the U.S. is facing in IW, develop concepts and evaluate capabilities solutions to address those challenges.
United States. Joint Forces Command
2009-03-11
-
Joint Operating Environment 2008: Challenges and Implications for the Future Joint Force
"In the broadest sense, the Joint Operating Environment examines three questions: What future trends and disruptions are likely to affect the Joint Force over the next quarter century? How are these trends and disruptions likely to define the future contexts for joint operations? What are the implications of these trends and contexts for the Joint Force? By exploring these trends, contexts, and implications, the Joint Operating Environment provides a basis for thinking about the world over the next quarter century. […]. If war at its essence is a human endeavor, then it follows that one of the most effective ways to understand human nature is by a close consideration of history. As such, rather than futuristic vignettes, the Joint Operating Environment uses history as a principal way to gain insight into the future. The discussion begins with the enduring nature of war, the causes and consequences of change and surprises, and the role of strategy. Part II then describes some trends, discontinuities and potential trouble spots that joint forces may confront. Part III analyzes how these trends and disruptions may combine into contexts that will likely define joint operations over the next quarter century. Part IV describes the implications of these contexts for the Joint Force as it confronts an uncertain future. […]. Before concluding, Part V offers some 'leading questions' about topics that may fall outside the traditional purview of this study, but that nonetheless have important implications for the future Joint Force."
United States. Joint Forces Command
2008-11-25
-
NLE 2-08: WNN Print News: NORTHCOM Chief Pledges Support to 'Second Seattle'
This is an exercise response to a terrorist attack on domestic territory.
United States. Joint Forces Command
2008-05-06?
-
News Release: AFNORTH Providing Civil Support
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY. THIS IS INTENDED FOR USE DURING NLE 2-08 ONLY.
United States. Joint Forces Command
2008-05-03
-
Manual for Courts-Martial, United States 2008 Edition
"The Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM), United States (2008 Edition) updates the MCM, (2005 Edition). It is a complete reprinting and incorporates the MCM (2005 Edition), the 2005 amendments to the MCM Rules for Courts-Martial, Military Rules of Evidence, and Punitive Articles made by the President in Executive Order (EO) 13387, 14 October 2005, the 2007 amendments contained in EO 13430, 18 April 2007, and the further 2007 amendments contained in EO 13447, 28 September 2007. The EOs referenced above can be found at Appendix 25 of this MCM. This edition also contains amendments to the UCMJ made by the National Defense Authorization Acts for Fiscal Years 2006 and 2007. Some of the significant changes from the MCM (2005 Edition) are summarized and listed below. This summary is for quick reference only and should not be relied upon or cited by practitioners in lieu of the actual provisions of the MCM that have been amended."
United States. Joint Forces Command
2008
-
Joint Center for Operational Analysis and Lessons Learned Quarterly Bulletin: Volume X, Issue 3, Fall 2008
This issue of the quarterly bulletin includes articles that discuss the following topics: "4th Generation War on Terror Information Operations in South Asia: The 21st Century's 'New Great Game' for the Modern Operator"; "Strategic Communications"; "Guardsmen and Jundis: A Historical Comparison of the USMC's [United States Marine Core] Experience of 'Native Troops' in Nicaragua, 1927-33 and Iraq, 2004-2008"; "Command Senior Enlisted Leaders in Asia-Pacific Work to Strengthen US Joint Operations and Partner Nation Militaries"; "Marine Air Ground Task Force Command and Control and Joint Interoperability: A Portfolio Approach to Delivering Capability to the Warfighter"; "The Critical Shortage of Military Chaplains: One Possible Solution"; "JCOA [Joint Center for Operational Analysis] Products Summary"; and "Points of Contact List".
United States. Joint Forces Command
2008
-
Joint Operating Environment: Trends and Challenges for the Future Joint Force through 2030
"The Joint Operating Environment document provides a framework for the study and articulation of a range of alternative future operating environments. The JOE presents future joint operating environments that have been developed after a wide-ranging examination of global, environmental, sociological, technological, and military dynamics that will influence the course of future conflict. The JOE document is intended to provide a research-based grounding for further discussions about the implications of potential future operational environmental trends for the joint training, experimentation, doctrinal development, and operational communities. These alternative futures can then be used to support the development of joint and service concepts, scenarios, experiments, exercises, and long term operational plans. By examining a number of critical trends influencing potential future operational environments and associated threats, this paper will serve as a common frame of reference and guide for civilian and military leaders responsible for the capabilities-based joint transformation process."
United States. Joint Forces Command
2007-12
-
Joint Operating Environment: Trends & Challenges for the Future Joint Force Through 2030
"Joint and service concept development and experimentation applies innovation and change to the ideas and capabilities that animate U.S. military forces to ensure that they are adapted to the world in which they operate. The process of innovation and change relies on an ability to foresee and anticipate the key factors that shape the world and the challenges which are intrinsic to these factors. […]. Because the future is also shaped by shocks and other events that are by definition difficult or impossible to foresee, a culture of innovation and change encourages us to remain agile and able to quickly adapt in the face of surprise. To encourage adaptation, the U.S. national defense and security community must at times take a step back and look beyond the imperatives of current operations. This paper -- the Joint Operating Environment (JOE) document -- is an effort to take this longer view to better understand change in the international system. This view focuses on the period some 8-30 years in the future. As a first step, the U.S. defense and security community must forge a broad understanding of the key components of the international system that are relevant to the application of military power. Second, we must understand how these components evolve over time. Perhaps most important, we must understand the likely operational military implication of these trends and shocks for the joint force."
United States. Joint Forces Command
2007-12
-
Strengthening the Interagency Process: The Case for Enhancing the Role of the National Security Advisor
"Prior to the US invasion of Iraq on 20 March 2003, several State Department and Department of Defense (DOD) agencies were frantically piecing together a detailed Phase IV (post-war) plan for Iraq. Unclear and ambiguous guidance from the National Security Council (NSC) forced State and DOD entities to conduct planning largely in isolation from one another, ultimately leading to a disjointed and stove-piped approach to reconstruction planning. The lack of a coordinated Phase IV planning approach during the execution of OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF) highlights the need to expand the powers of the National Security Advisor. New congressional legislation should mandate the coordination of the security roles of all federal agencies in the U.S. Government under a Director for National Security to provide clear direction and focus for all pre- and post-war planning."
United States. Joint Forces Command
Arana, Julio; Owens, Jonathan M.; Wrubel, David T.
2006-08-25
-
Iraqi Perspectives Project: A View of Operation Iraqi Freedom from Saddam's Senior Leadership
"U.S. Joint Forces Command released an unclassified historical report of military operations conducted in Iraq. The twist is that this historical report reflects the Iraqi civilian and military leadership's perspective of events. 'Opinions are not facts; one data point is not a trend, and a group of data points from a single perspective isn't going to convince anyone,' said Army Brig. Gen. Anthony Cucolo, U.S. Joint Forces Command's (USJFCOM), Joint Center for Operational Analysis (JCOA) director. The overthrow of Saddam's regime during Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) provided an opportunity to study an adversary. 'It's the first time since World War II, we had an opportunity to evaluate military events from both our own perspective and the perspective of the opposing political and military leadership,' Cucolo said. "This means reading their documents, reading their orders, interviewing their commanders and civilian leaders and asking what happened.' This two-year project of delving into the decision-making processes of the former adversary started in 2003 and became known as the Iraqi Perspective Project (IPP). The Iraqi military leaders wanted to tell their side of the story. According to Cucolo, in terms of lessons learned, the historical approach implemented during the IPP provided excellent results. The IPP team conducted more than 100 interviews; 23 with senior members of the former regime. Interviews conducted by the IPP team included: Saddam's personal secretary, the secretary of the Republican Guard, both Republican Guard corps commanders, the commander of the Special Republican Guard, the director of military intelligence, division commanders and others."
United States. Joint Forces Command
Woods, Kevin M.; Pease, Michael R.; Stout, Mark E. . . .
2006-03-24
-
Multiservice Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Contamination Avoidance
"This multiservice operations publication provides tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP) for conducting chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) avoidance. This document presents comprehensive TTP for passive and active avoidance measures. Users of this manual will be CBRN staff officers, CBRN noncommissioned officers (NCOs), non-CBRN personnel performing collateral duties as an additional duty CBRN officer or NCO, commanders and staff at the tactical through strategic levels, and civilian agencies. The purpose of this publication is to provide commanders, staffs, key agencies, and service members with a key reference for planning and conducting CBRN avoidance. It provides the tools for CBRN defense personnel to implement active and passive CBRN avoidance measures and supports the decision-making process. It also serves as a key source document for refining existing training support packages, training center exercises, and service school curricula."
United States. Joint Forces Command
2006-02
-
Potential Military Chemical/Biological Agents and Compounds
"This document provides commanders and staffs with general information and technical data concerning chemical/biological (CB) agents and other compounds of military interest such as toxic industrial chemicals (TIC). It explains the use; classification; and physical, chemical, and physiological properties of these agents and compounds. Users of this manual are nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC)/chemical, biological, and radiological (CBR) staff officers, NBC noncommissioned officers (NCOs), staff weather officers (SWOs), NBC medical defense officers, medical readiness officers, medical intelligence officers, field medical treatment officers, and others involved in planning battlefield operations in an NBC environment."
United States. Joint Forces Command
2005-01
-
Joint Center for Operational Analysis and Lessons Learned Quarterly Bulletin: December 2004
This issue of the quarterly bulletin includes articles that discuss the following topics: how NORTHCOM can organize into area commands for its protection and civil support missions; the Posse Comitatus Act; the role of federal military forces in domestic law enforcement; U.S. Joint Forces Commands Response to the Terrorism Threat Against the Homeland; U.S. Army Veterinary Corps and Homeland Security; Lessons Learned in Response and Recovery; National Guard and Homeland Defense; Role of State Defense Forces in Homeland Security; National Disaster Medical System; NOAA and NOAA corps play vital role in homeland security; U.S. Coast Guards Maritime Security Strategy; Comprehensive Perimeter Security; Maritime Security for our Nations Democratic Process; Proliferation Security Initiative and Exercise CHOKEPOINT 04; Coast Guard Port Security Unit as a Deployable Asset in National Defense; and, Coast Guard Aviation and the Challenge of Homeland Security.
United States. Joint Forces Command
2004-12
-
Joint National Training Capability: An Overview
This briefing, given by John Woods - Technical Director at the Joint Warfighting Center, reviews the vision and implementation strategy of the Joint National Training Capability (JNTC), as well as JNTC training events and challenges to joint capability development. The JNTC itself - a collection of interoperable training sites, nodes, and events that synthesizes Combatant Commander and Service training requirements - seeks to advance the Department of Defense's transformation efforts by enabling multinational, interagency, and intergovernmental training.
United States. Joint Forces Command
Woods, John
2004-09-28
-
Joint Center for Operational Analysis and Lessons Learned Quarterly Bulletin: September 2004
"This issue of the JCOA-LL Bulletin is focused on the USCG, and each article tells a different aspect of their mission. The first two articles are an introduction by Vice Admiral Crea, Commander Coast Guard Atlantic Area, and an overview of the USCG today by the Commandant of the Coast Guard, Admiral Collins. These are followed by several articles on the response of the USCG to the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001, and their role in homeland defense under the newly formed Department of Homeland Security, and as a part of the US Northern Command team in securing our shores and combating terrorism. The next four articles tell the story of the USCG in OIF and detail the lessons learned in supporting the war and in post-conflict reconstruction efforts. The next article provides the lessons learned in the most recent effort in Haiti, where the Coast Guard was designated as the MCC during the migrant operations. And the final article gives us a perspective of the lessons learned during the Viet Nam conflict, where the USCG deployed a number of cutters to assist in both port and navigation operations."
United States. Joint Forces Command
2004-09
-
Joint Vision 2020's Achilles Heel: Interagency Cooperation between the Departments of Defense and State
"Issued by the Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff in June 2000, Joint Vision 2020 represents the transformation blueprint of the Department of Defense (DOD). In addition to a predictable focus on service component jointness, DOD transformation relies on a functioning, flexible interagency process in order that the military participates 'effectively as one element of a unified national effort.' Insofar as the Department of State (State) plays a key role in integrating the diplomatic and military elements of US national power, this shift beyond jointness underscores a clear and compelling need to increase the effectiveness of the DOD-State partnership. DOD and State must overcome three impediments before the required partnership can flourish at the operational level: first, the military's hesitancy to allow itself to be controlled by State; second, States inability to fully execute its mission as the 'quiet, steady voice of diplomacy'; and third, the current trend toward allowing the military to craft foreign policy of its own accord. DOD and State can, however, overcome these impediments through increased interagency liaison, training, and personnel exchange. Without these efforts to build an effective interagency partnership, however, Joint Vision 2020 is imperiled."
United States. Joint Forces Command
2004-05-18
-
Special Operations: Missions, Roles, and Lessons Learned
From the foreword by Gordon C. Nash: "Special operations forces (SOF) have played, and will play, a major role in recent and future U.S. conflicts. Examples of recent SOF involvement include Somalia, Afghanistan, and Panama. [...] Therefore, this Joint Center for Lessons Learned (JCLL) Bulletin presents information on the SOF from the perspective of the Special Operations Command of the Joint Forces Command (SOCJFCOM). The majority of the articles in this Bulletin were written by the SOCJFCOM staff and present the lessons learned and recommendations from the SOF involvement in training exercises and realworld operations." Articles include: "Special Operations Command Joint Forces Command (SOCJFCOM)"; "Special Operations Forces--Integration in Joint Warfighting"; "Fires and Maneuver--Challenges on the Noncontiguous Battlefield. A SOF Perspective"; "Homeland Security and Special Operations: Sorting-out Procedures, Capabilities, and Operational Issues"; and two "Joint Special Operations Insights" newsletters.
United States. Joint Forces Command
2003-03
-
Human Behavior and WMD Crisis/Risk Communication Workshop
"This report is a comprehensive analysis of the 'Human Behavior and WMD Crisis/Risk Communication Workshop,' held on December 11- 12, 2000. It describes the results of the workshop, and includes lessons learned from past experiences, addresses unresolved issues that were identified by combining the expertise of the participants, and it presents prioritized recommendations for future research, analysis, and other activities. This section of the report includes recommendations not only from the panel itself, but from a senior advisory board created specifically for this workshop." Note: This document has been added to the Homeland Security Digital Library in agreement with the Project on Advanced Systems and Concepts for Countering WMD (PASCC) as part of the PASCC collection. Permission to download and/or retrieve this resource has been obtained through PASCC.
United States. Defense Threat Reduction Agency; United States. Federal Bureau of Investigation; United States. Joint Forces Command
2001-03
-
Handbook for Joint Task Force Domestic Consequence Management Operations
"This handbook is a guide for joint task force and response task force commanders, their staffs, and subordinate units who may be tasked to provide support to a lead Federal agency during consequence management operations. This document is not a doctrinal publication, but in the absence of such a joint publication, is meant to be a resource tool; and should be supplemented, when practicable, with the United States Joint Forces Command Joint Warfighting Center Consequence Management Database maintained as a part of the Joint Electronic Library. However, it does support joint and Service doctrinal concepts and principles and is a focused collection of consequence management information already published from Federal, state, and local sources, as well as lessons learned from past exercises."
United States. Joint Forces Command
2000-07
-
Joint Task Force Andrew After Action Report
This after-action report provides a broad overview of Joint Task Force Andrew operations based on the analysis of joint assessment topics, such as healthcare, logistics, and joint airspace management, as they apply across the joint spectrum. Joint Task Force Andrew assisted the Department of Defense in complying with the provisions of the Stafford Act after Hurricane Andrew in 1992.
United States. Joint Forces Command
1992
-
Treatment of Chemical Agent Casualties and Conventional Military Chemical Injuries
This manual serves as a guide and a reference for trained members of the Armed Forces Medical Services and other medically qualified personnel on the recognition and treatment of chemical agent casualties and conventional military chemical injuries. Additionally, this manual provides information on first aid (self-aid, buddy aid, and combat lifesaver (CLS) aid) for these casualties. The manual is divided in two parts. Part One covers the recognition and treatment of nerve agents, incapacitating agents, blister agents (vesicants), lung-damaging agents (choking agents), and blood agents (cyanogens) casualties. Part Two covers the recognition and treatment of injuries caused by riot control agents, smokes, incendiary agents, and other noxious industrial-type chemicals.
United States. Joint Forces Command
-
United States Joint Forces Command [website]
"U.S. Joint Forces Command (USJFCOM) is one of nine combatant commands in the Department of Defense, and the only combatant command focused on the transformation of U.S. military capabilities. As the joint force integrator, USJFCOM helps develop, evaluate, and prioritize the solutions to the interoperability problems plaguing the joint warfighter. At USJFCOM, joint interoperability and integration initiatives continue to deliver material and non-material solutions to interoperability challenges by working closely with combatant commanders, services and government agencies to identify and resolve joint warfighting deficiencies."
United States. Joint Forces Command
1
