Advanced search Help
Searching for terms: EXACT: "United States. Federal Aviation Administration" in: publisher
Clear all search criteria
Only 2/3! You are seeing results from the Public Collection, not the complete Full Collection. Sign in to search everything (see eligibility).
-
Interim Operational Approval Guidance: Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations in the U. S. National Airspace System
"The proliferation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) into the National Air Space (NAS) has resulted in an increased demand for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process a large number of applications to review for operational approvals. These approvals are required due to the fact that unmanned aircraft (UA) are not compliant with various sections of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) and therefore, require an alternate means of compliance. Most notably, the lack of an on-board pilot requires an alternate method of the 'see-and-avoid' provisions of 14 CFR 91.113, Right-of-Way Rules: Except Water Operations. This document is intended to provide guidance and information to Aviation Safety (AVS) and Air Traffic Organization (ATO) personnel who are charged with the processing, reviewing, and approving of UAS operations. The interim guidance presented in this document represents the culmination of best practices and procedures used in prior UAS approvals, as well as input from other government agencies, industry and user stakeholders. It should be noted that the material presented in this document is a recommended approach to approving typical UAS operations, however, each application needs to be assessed on its own technical merits and may require unique authorizations which are based on the specific needs or capabilities of the UAS in question. It should be further noted that due to the rapid evolution of UAS technology, this guidance material will be subject to continuous review and may be updated when appropriate."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
2008-03-13
-
Department of Transportation Inspector General Top Management Challenges for Fiscal Year 2010: Federal Aviation Administration Year End Progress Reports
This document contains information regarding the Department of Transportation Inspector General's top management challenges for fiscal year 2010. The following challenges are addressed: "Maximizing the Department's Economic Recovery Investments," "Addressing Human Factors and Strengthening the Regulatory and Oversight Framework for Aviation Safety," "Moving Toward the Next Generation Air Transportation System and Improving Performance of the National Airspace System," "Improving Contract Management and Oversight," "Enhancing the Ability to Combat Cyber Attacks and Improving the Governance of Information Technology Resources," and " Strengthening the Department's Acquisition Workforce."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
2010-11-08
-
National Airspace System Capital Investment Plan: FY 2012-2016
"The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Capital Investment Plan (CIP) is prepared annually as required by provisions in legislation. In addition to addressing the legislated requirements, the CIP is a valuable tool for meeting the internal need for managing complex modernization of the National Airspace System (NAS). It assists FAA management in balancing the pace of modernization with available resources, focuses investments on meeting strategic goals, and allows the integration of program planning necessary to manage interdependencies and product deliveries. The CIP describes planned capital investments for the next five years consistent with the amount requested in the annual budget submission. The planned project accomplishments shown in the CIP are consistent with the President's Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 budget request and out-year funding estimates. These out-year funding amounts are changes from the 2010 CIP and require a re-plan of our modernization program. Our planning allows us to remain on track to deliver the FAA's core framework for Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) implementation, particularly the capabilities requested by the aviation community. These core elements include improving surface operations, freeing up metroplex congestion and implementing Automatic Dependence Surveillance-Broadcast (ADSB) ground infrastructure, progress that focuses on delivering capabilities to operators and benefits to the public. This CIP slows the deployment, however, of certain transformational NextGen capabilities, such as Data Communications and the NAS Voice System, and it defers some research and development activities. It also defers construction activities of NextGen facilities."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
2011
-
Annual Runway Safety Report: 2009
"The Office of Runway Safety publishes this annual report to educate and inform all aviation stakeholders of the ongoing efforts to improve runway safety as part of its Runway Safety Management Strategy. The 2009 FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] Annual Runway Safety Report presents the FAA's progress towards the Flight Plan goals and performance targets for runway safety. The Report also articulates the various initiatives that were part of the Runway Safety Management Strategy to achieve these goals for FY 2005 through FY 2008. In cases where sufficient time has passed since the implementation of a particular strategy, runway incursion trends are presented to demonstrate the relative contribution of these strategies towards improving runway safety."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
2009
-
Annual Runway Safety Report: 2010
"The FAA's [Federal Aviation Administration] Office of Runway Safety publishes this annual report to inform aviation stakeholders of the ongoing efforts to improve runway safety. The 2010 FAA Annual Runway Safety Report presents the FAA's progress toward the Flight Plan goals and performance targets for runway safety. The report also describes the NextGen initiatives that pertain to runway safety, the role of human factors in runway safety, and FAA's international leadership responsibility, all contributing to improving the future of runway safety".
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
2010
-
Summary of Air Traffic Hijack Events, September 11, 2001
This document contains maps and notes regarding the timeline of movements and positions of all four planes involved in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States. Also included are all radio transmissions between air traffic control towers and all four planes from initial runway taxi to crash impact.
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
-
Chronology of the September 11 Attacks and Subsequent Events Through October 24, 2001
This document contains a detailed timeline of events related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States and subsequent anthrax attacks as they occurred from September 11, 2001 to October 24, 2001.
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
-
Search and Rescue Overview [presentation]
This presentation provides an overview by the Air Traffic Organization (FTO) of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to Federal and State search and rescue (SAR) coordinators regarding FAA's role in search and rescue, how SAR missions are processed, activities of 2010/2011, important statistics, and success stories. The importance of using correct latitude and longitude formats to prevent search delays was also noted.
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
Olsen, Mark W.
2011-05-31
-
Final Environmental Assessment for Jacksonville Aviation Authority Launch Site Operator License at Cecil Field, Florida
"The Final Environmental Assessment (EA) for Jacksonville Aviation Authority Launch Site Operator License at Cecil Field, Florida addresses the potential environmental impacts of the Proposed Action, where the FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] would issue a Launch Site Operator License to Jacksonville Aviation Authority (JAA) to operate a commercial launch facility at Cecil Field Airport (Cecil Field) in Duval County, Florida. The EA evaluates the impacts of launching two types of horizontal, reusable launch vehicles (RLV), including the Concept X and Concept Z vehicles. JAA proposes to support a maximum of 52 annual launches, including 48 launches of the Concept X vehicle and four launches of the Concept Z vehicle. Potential impacts of the Proposed Action and No Action Alternative were analyzed in the EA. Potential environmental impacts of successful launches include impacts to climate and air quality coastal resources; compatible land use; Department of Transportation Act, Section 4(t) resources farmlands; fish, wildlife, and plants; floodplains; hazardous materials, pollution prevention, and solid waste; historic, architectural, archaeological, and cultural resources; light emissions and visual resources; natural resources, energy supply, and sustainable design; noise; socioeconomics water quality; wetlands; wild and scenic rivers; children's environmental health and safety risks environmental justice; construction impacts; secondary (induced) impacts; airports/airport users airspace; and transportation. Potential cumulative impacts of the Proposed Action are also addressed in the EA. The EA found that there would be no significant impacts to any of the resource areas analyzed as a result of issuing a Launch Site Operator License to JAA. A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) has been included in the EA. The FAA responded to all comments received during the public review process in the Final EA."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
Zee, Stacey M.; Czelusniak, Daniel; Soderstrum, Mary . . .
2009-07
-
DOT and FAA Propose New Rules for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
"WASHINGTON -- The Department of Transportation's [DOT] Federal Aviation Administration [FAA] today proposed a framework of regulations that would allow routine use of certain small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) in today's aviation system, while maintaining flexibility to accommodate future technological innovations. The FAA proposal offers safety rules for small UAS (under 55 pounds) conducting non-recreational operations. The rule would limit flights to daylight and visual-line-of-sight operations. It also addresses height restrictions, operator certification, optional use of a visual observer, aircraft registration and marking, and operational limits. The proposed rule also includes extensive discussion of the possibility of an additional, more flexible framework for 'micro' UAS under 4.4 pounds. The FAA is asking the public to comment on this possible classification to determine whether it should include this option as part of a final rule. The FAA is also asking for comment about how the agency can further leverage the UAS test site program and an upcoming UAS Center of Excellence to further spur innovation at 'innovation zones.' "
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
2015-02-15
-
Overview of Small UAS Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Summary of Major Provisions of Proposed Part 107
This document highlights provisions that "are being proposed in the FAA's [Federal Aviation Administration] Small UAS [unmanned aircraft systems] NPRM [notice of proposed rulemaking]." The document contains the following categories: (1) Operational Limitations; (2) Operator Certification and Responsibilities; (3) Aircraft Requirements; and (4) Model Aircraft.
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
2015?
-
National Runway Safety Plan 2015 - 2017
"Today's aerospace enterprise is among the most technically complex systems ever devised. The demands on the National Airspace System plus the impact of evolving technology, rising traffic volumes, and the implementation of the Next Generation Air Transportation System create an environment where assumptions must be continually tested and validated using robust feedback loops. Recognizing the scope of this increasing complexity, the Administrator recently reinforced the importance of building upon the ability of the Federal Aviation Administration Safety Management System to find the issues, use multiple data streams to analyze the issues, and devise comprehensive corrective actions that are measured and monitored. The 2015-2017 National Runway Safety Plan (referred to herein as the 'Plan') directly supports the Administrator's Strategic Priorities including the initiatives to make aviation safer and smarter on the nation's airports by moving to risk-based decision making; enabling the safe and efficient integration of the Next Generation Air Transportation System; and demonstrating global leadership in improving air traffic safety and efficiency through data-driven solutions that shape international standards. Evaluating runway safety performance, given the increased volume of air and surface traffic and the accommodation of new aerospace vehicles, requires moving beyond just tracking and determining responsibility for runway incursions and other incidents. This Plan outlines the transition from a reactive, event-based safety system to a proactive, risk-based system that incorporates the safety policies, culture, risk management, promotional, and analytical tools available in the Safety Management System. Utilizing these principles, the agency is transitioning to a data driven, risk-based approach to monitoring and maintaining the safety parameters of the runway and airport surface environment."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
2014-07-31
-
Law Enforcement Guidance for Suspected Unauthorized UAS Operations
"The general public, a wide variety of organizations, including private sector (e.g., commercial companies), non-governmental (e.g., volunteer organizations), and governmental entities (e.g., local agencies) continue to demonstrate significant interest in UAS [Unmanned Aircraft Systems]. The benefits offered by this type of aircraft are substantial and the FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] is committed to integrating UAS into the National Airspace System (NAS). This introduction, however, must address important safety and security considerations. The increasing number of cases of unauthorized use of UAS is a serious concern for the FAA and, in terms of safety and security challenges, many of its interagency partners. This document is intended to assist LEAs [Law Enforcement Agencies] in understanding the legal framework that serves as the basis for FAA legal enforcement action against UAS operators for unauthorized and/or unsafe UAS operations (Section 1) and to provide guidance regarding the role of LEAs in deterring, detecting, and investigating unauthorized and/or unsafe UAS operations (Section 2)."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
-
First Responder Safety at a Small Aircraft or Helicopter Accident Scene
"Fortunately, airplane accidents rarely occur, so few occupations have specific training to work at an aircraft accident site (usually only airport rescue firefighters (ARFF) and accident investigators). There are usually about 1500-1700 accidents in the US per year. A majority of these accidents involve small aircraft or helicopters. Most current training for aircraft accidents involves scenarios on larger commercial aircraft accidents. Make no mistake, larger aircraft accidents represent the large-casualty situations and demand that first responder skills are sharp and ready. Statistically, however, you as a first responder are much more likely to encounter an accident involving a small aircraft or helicopter.
A lot of different groups have a stake in an airplane accident: the operator, the rescuers (from many disciplines), the manufacturers and the investigators. They all have something to offer and something to gain in sharing their knowledge. In this article, we will cover how the FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] got into this training, how a lot of different groups helped contribute, how the training is laid out, and finally, some of the considerations and hazards at an accident scene."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
Stegeman, Bob
-
DOT and FAA Finalize Rules for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
"WASHINGTON - Today, the Department of Transportation's (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)has finalized the first operational rules for routine commercial use of small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS or "drones"), opening pathways towards fully integrating UAS into the nation's airspace. These new regulations work to harness new innovations safely, to spur job growth, advance critical scientific research and save lives. […] According to industry estimates, the rule could generate more than $82 billion for the U.S. economy and create more than 100,000 new jobs over the next 10 years. The new rule, which takes effect in late August, offers safety regulations for unmanned aircraft drones weighing less than 55 pounds that are conducting non-hobbyist operations. The rule's provisions are designed to minimize risks to other aircraft and people and property on the ground. The regulations require pilots to keep an unmanned aircraft within visual line of sight. Operations are allowed during daylight and during twilight if the drone has anti-collision lights. The new regulations also address height and speed restrictions and other operational limits, such as prohibiting flights over unprotected people on the ground who aren't directly participating in the UAS operation."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
2016-06-21
-
State and Local Regulation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Fact Sheet
"Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) are aircraft subject to regulation by the FAA to ensure safety
of flight, and safety of people and property on the ground. States and local jurisdictions are
increasingly exploring regulation of UAS or proceeding to enact legislation relating to UAS
operations. In 2015, approximately 45 states have considered restrictions on UAS. In addition,
public comments on the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) proposed rule, 'Operation and
Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems' (Docket No. FAA-2015-0150), expressed
concern about the possible impact of state and local laws on UAS operations. [...] This fact sheet is intended to provide basic information about the federal regulatory framework
for use by states and localities when considering laws affecting UAS. State and local restrictions
affecting UAS operations should be consistent with the extensive federal statutory and regulatory
framework pertaining to control of the airspace, flight management and efficiency, air traffic
control, aviation safety, navigational facilities, and the regulation of aircraft noise at its source."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
2015-12-17
-
FAA: Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
This section of the Federal Aviation Administration website provides information on the rules and regulations pertaining to Unmanned Aircraft Systems. "An unmanned aircraft system (UAS), sometimes called a drone, is an aircraft without a human pilot onboard - instead, the UAS is controlled from an operator on the ground. When you fly a drone in the United States, it is your responsibility to understand and abide by the rules."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
-
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Registration Task Force (RTF), Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC): Task Force Recommendations Final Report
"The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) chartered the Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
Registration Task Force (RTF) Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) (Task Force) to provide
recommendations to the FAA 'on registration requirements and process for small UAS, including
those used for commercial purposes, and all model aircraft.' [...] The stated objective of the Task Force was to develop recommendations for the creation of a
registration process, which ultimately would contribute to an enforceable rule imposed by the FAA.
The FAA stated that the intent of establishing this registration framework was to promote a culture
of accountability while achieving a maximum level of compliance."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
2015-11-21
-
Effects of Laser Illumination on Operational and Visual Performance of Pilots During Final Approach
Several hundred incidents involving the illumination of aircrew members by laser light have been reported in recent years, including several that could have had serious consequences. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the performance of pilots exposed to visible laser radiation during final approach maneuvers at 100 feet above the runway in the Laser-Free Zone.
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
2004-06-24?
-
Batteries Carried by Airline Passengers Frequently Asked Questions
This document contains frequently asked questions regarding carrying batteries on airplanes.
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
2008-01-11
-
FAA Strategic Plan, 2002 Supplement
The Strategic Plan Supplement brings together FAA's strategic goals and strategies, annual performance goals, actions, ongoing activities and corporate projects for change that FAA expects to take to achieve its goals. It lays the groundwork for FAA to monitor and ensure successful completion of those initiatives.
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
2002-01
-
Aviation Security Technology Assessment Effort: Report of the Security Subcommittee, February 2002
The Aviation Security R&D Advisory Subcommittee, augmented by members of the RE&D and Aviation Security Advisory Committees, met on October 25 and November 16, 2001, to address the myriad technologies proposed by the public and industry in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Chairman John Klinkenberg organized this Technology Assessment team into six working groups. This report presents a synopsis of the recommendations of the various work groups.
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
2002-02
-
Federal Aviation Administration Budget in Brief - Fiscal Year 2005
This is budget for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 2005. It recognizes that fulfilling its primary missions, the safety and efficiency of U.S. aviation, requires continued vigilance in the face of change. The FY 2005 budget requests supports symbiotic evolutions of several key elements of the systems, leading to higher performance in the major goal areas. In FY 2005, the agency continues to focus its resources primarily on aviation safety, with goals that would further reduce aviation accidents, deaths, and injuries. Second only to safety are the agency's efforts to ensure sufficient system capacity to support future traffic levels. Integral to the primary safety and mobility goals are supporting goals that would strengthen the FAA's role in the global aviation environment, maintain security within the agency's facilities, decrease aviation's impact on the environment, and improve the management of the agency. The total FAA 2005 request of $13.97 billion funds current services and focused improvements in safety, and is approximately 1 percent higher than President's budget request for FY 2004. About 63 percent of the budget, or $8.8 billion, will contribute to further reductions in aviation accidents, deaths, and injuries. Another 28 percent, or $3.9 billion, will support capacity growth. The remainder of the agency's budget will support international leadership, environmental stewardship, internal security, and the agency's efforts to create a more cost-efficient, world-class organization.
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
-
Test and Evaluation Report for the Manual Domestic Passive Profiling System (MDPPS)
"Increases in threat conditions can result in a requirement for additional security precautions at airports. These precautions are often resource intensive for the airlines. The cost of additional airport security systems, however, could be reduced if the number of passengers needing special security measures was minimized. This report discusses the results of increasing airport security by manually evaluating passenger 'profiles' to identify domestic travelers thought not to represent a threat."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
Fobes, J. L.; Lofaro, Ronald J.
1994-09
-
Initial Development of Selection Instruments for Evaluating Applicants as Potential Airline Passenger Baggage Screeners for Conventional X-Ray Technology
"Currently there is a paucity of research that has been conducted to improve the selection process for airline passenger baggage screener personnel. Careful selection of these personnel is important to obtain the best qualified personnel and to mitigate the characteristically high employee turnover rate that is associated with the training losses in this industry. This report describes the development and evaluation of two-computer cognitive instruments that were examined as possible selection tools. The results from a concurrent validity pilot study demonstrated a strong relationship between measures from the predictor instruments and selected performance criteria."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
Fobes, J. L.; McAnulty, D. Michael
1995-07
-
Test and Evaluation Plan for the Explosive Device Detection Baseline (EDDB) Study
"This document is the Test and Evaluation Plan (TEP) to evaluate Improvised Explosive Device (IED) detection capabilities. Specifically, the testing effort will evaluate the ability of airport security personnel to detect IEDs in carry-on passenger bags. The test and evaluation (T&E) focuses on determining the baseline performance levels as set forth in the Critical Operational Issues and Criteria (COIC). The T&E will be conducted at 19 U.S. Category X (CAT X) airports. The results will be analyzed and become part of a later document."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
Fobes, J. L.; Klock, Brenda A.
1995-08
-
Dupe Checklist System: Resolution Procedures Manual
"The Resolution Procedures Manual is one of five security reference handbooks providing background information, guidelines and procedures regarding passenger questioning and resolutions in conjunction with the Dupe Checklist (DCS) Program. It is intended to be used for operational guidance and/or training activities. A passenger may be duped into carrying a bomb on board an aircraft under the following circumstances: (1) A bomb is placed in an unsuspecting passenger's unattended baggage; (2) An unsuspecting passenger is given a bag to transport on his/her flight. A bomb is concealed inside the bag; (3) An unsuspecting passenger is given an item or a package to transport on his/ her flight. The item/package contains a bomb: (4) An unsuspecting passenger is given a 'gift' just prior to the flight. The gift contains a bomb; (5) A passenger may believe that he/she is involved in some type of illegal activity. Such a passenger may believe that his/her bag contains contraband (e.g. drugs, gold, cash, or diamonds). The passenger is not aware of the true contents of his/her bag (a bomb); (6) A passenger who is a terrorist, or a terrorist group sympathizer, may believe he/she is transferring confidential material or an explosive to his/her destination. In reality the passenger is carrying a bomb setup to go off on his/her flight."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
Fobes, J. L.
1995-12
-
Test and Evaluation Plan for Threat Image Projection with the CTX 5000 Explosives Detection System
"The effectiveness of Threat Image Projection (TIP) as an element of the Screener Proficiency Evaluation and Reporting System (SPEARS) for checked baggage screening with the CTX 5000 is evaluated. The CTX 5000 combines computed tomographic imaging and automated detection of explosives. This complex system requires that screeners learn to skillfully discriminate innocent bags that cause the system to alarm from genuine threats. Testing is designed to determine the effectiveness of TIP in meeting the critical operational issues described in this plan. Specifically, is TIP effective in improving and maintaining screener performance in the detection of improvised explosive devices? Can the performance of individual screeners be monitored effectively with TIP? The testing will be conducted at airports where the CTX 5000 system is currently located."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
Fobes, J. L.; Cormier, Stephen
1996-09
-
Criminal Acts against Civil Aviation- 1991
"Criminal acts against civil aviation is a compilation of hijackings, bombings and other significant criminal acts against civil and general aviation interests worldwide."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
1991
-
Some Significant Wildlife Strikes to Civil Aircraft in the United States, January 1990 - November 2009
"The U.S. [United States] Department of Agriculture, through an interagency agreement with the Federal Aviation Administration, compiles a database of all reported wildlife strikes to U.S. civil aircraft and to foreign carriers experiencing strikes in the USA. We have compiled over 89,700 strike reports from 1,476 USA airports and 211 foreign airports for January 1990 through December 2008 (7,516 strikes in 2008), but estimate that this represents only about 39% of the strikes that have occurred. The following examples from the database are presented to show the serious impacts that strikes by birds or other wildlife can have on aircraft. These examples, from throughout the USA, demonstrate the widespread and diverse nature of the problem. The examples are not intended to highlight or criticize individual airports because strikes have occurred on almost every airport in the USA. Many of the strike examples reported here occurred off airport property during approach or departure."
United States. Federal Aviation Administration
Wright, Sandra E.
2010-01-12
