Advanced search Help
Searching for terms: EXACT: "United States. Department of the Navy" in: publisher
Clear all search criteria
Only 2/3! You are seeing results from the Public Collection, not the complete Full Collection. Sign in to search everything (see eligibility).
-
Response to Congress: Navy's Waterborne Firefighting Capability
From the Document: "Following the BHR [USS Bonhomme Richard] incident, where firefighting-equipped Navy tug boats were employed, the Navy has reinforced the importance of waterborne and airborne firefighting capability and has ensured both are incorporated into Navy installation emergency response plans. The Navy assesses that existing waterborne firefighting capability and capacity is sufficient and there is no requirement for dedicated fire boats to support shipboard firefighting requirements. [...] As stated, Navy tug boats have inherent firefighting capabilities. Since the BHR incident, Commander, Navy Installations Command issued a directive (enclosure 1) to ensure that Navy installation emergency response plan functional area annexes and major shipboard fire hazard specific appendices include tug boat firefighting capabilities."
United States. Department of the Navy
2022-04-08
-
Report to Congress on the Annual Long-Range Plan for Construction of Naval Vessels for Fiscal Year 2023
From the Document: "The Department continues to evaluate industrial base health and support to Fleet readiness, capacity, and capability. Timely industrial base delivery of systems and platforms within cost estimates is a key consideration as it quickly enhances warfighting performance. Improvements in today's production enable greater capability and capacity for developing future platforms, such as the future large surface combatant (DDG(X)) and the next generation attack submarine (SSN(X)). The DoN [Department of the Navy], working with industry partners, will deliberately reduce execution risk through improved cost estimation, prototyping, and landbased testing systems to de-risk critical technologies and ensure that new programs deliver on expected capabilities."
United States. Department of the Navy
2022-04
-
Real-Time Aircraft Sound Monitoring: Final Report
From the Executive Summary: "In compliance with the Fiscal Year 2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the United States Department of the Navy (Navy) measured sound levels of jet aircraft at Naval Air Station (NAS) Whidbey Island and NAS Lemoore over the past year and compared the resulting measured data with modeled noise data. In accordance with Department of Defense (DoD) policy, the Navy assesses military noise using DoD-approved noise models for impact assessments and long-term land use planning. Measuring of military sound is implemented only when modeling is not feasible. In this case, Congress directed the Navy to measure aircraft sound by conducting real-time sound monitoring and to report the results of such monitoring, along with a comparison of the monitoring results with noise contours from prior studies that used DoD-approved noise modeling."
United States. Department of the Navy
2021-11-30
-
Unmanned Campaign Framework
From the Introduction: "The National Defense Strategy (NDS) defines 'the central challenge to U.S. prosperity and security as the reemergence of long-term, strategic competition' posed by Russia and China. It emphasizes that, 'America's military has no preordained right to victory on the battlefield.' 'The developing abilities of near-peer competitors drive the need for increased Naval capability distributed over a wider area'. [...] 'Autonomous systems provide additional warfighting capability and capacity to augment our traditional combatant force, allowing the option to take on greater operational risk while maintaining a tactical and strategic advantage'. The Navy and Marine Corps are already operating unmanned systems, and going forward will seek to achieve a seamlessly integrated manned-unmanned force across all domains. The question is not 'if' the Naval force will prioritize and leverage unmanned platforms and systems, but how quickly and efficiently, in resource-constrained environments."
United States. Department of the Navy
2021-03-16
-
Advantage At Sea: Prevailing with Integrated All-Domain Naval Power
From the Introduction: "The United States is a maritime nation. Our security and prosperity depend on the seas. Since the end of World War II, the United States has built, led, and advanced a rules-based international system through shared commitments with our allies and partners. Forward deployed forces of the U.S. Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard--collectively known as the Naval Service--have guaranteed the security of this system. Free and open access to the world's oceans has fostered an extraordinary era of wealth and peace for many nations. That system is now at risk. 'Advantage at Sea' is a Tri-Service Maritime Strategy that focuses on China and Russia, the two most significant threats to this era of global peace and prosperity. We prioritize competition with China due to its growing economic and military strength, increasing aggressiveness, and demonstrated intent to dominate its regional waters and remake the international order in its favor. Until China chooses to act as a responsible stakeholder rather than brandish its power to further its authoritarian interests, it represents the most comprehensive threat to the United States, our allies, and all nations supporting a free and open system."
United States. Department of the Navy; United States. Marine Corps; United States. Coast Guard
2020-12
-
USNS Comfort Arrival: Frequently Asked Questions
From the Document: "The Department of Defense and United States Navy have unique capabilities and surge capabilities that can be brought to help with the fight against the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) virus. Our priorities are clear...1) protect our force and their families, 2) protect our readiness to defend the homelands and 3) support our interagency partners in addressing the crisis. We are committed to providing defense support to civil authorities by increasing medical capacity and collaboration for medical assistance and disaster relief in the two areas of our country that have seen tremendous impact from the COVID-19 pandemic."
United States. Department of the Navy
2020-03-29
-
Highlights of the Department of the Navy FY 2021 Budget
From the Document: "The Fiscal Year 2021 (FY21) President's Budget submission (PB21) of $207.1B is an increase of $1.9B (0.9%) from the FY20 enacted budget (base+OCO), less $4.8B added by Congress in Natural Disaster funding we received in FY20. This budget supports irreversible implementation of the National Defense Strategy (NDS) and balances priorities in order to maximize naval power now and in the future. This budget achieves several major goals. First, PB21 recapitalizes the COLUMBIA strategic ballistic missile submarine, our nation's ultimate insurance policy and the Navy's highest priority. Next, this budget sustains our readiness recovery to deliver credible forces to win today's fight. Third, PB21 aggressively pursues increased lethality and targets those areas of modernization with the greatest potential to deliver non-linear warfighting advantages. This budget also prioritizes the development and delivery of Naval Expeditionary forces capable of imposing cost with distributed, lethal power that is sustainable. Finally, this budget delivers capable capacity within the constraints of our budget topline."
United States. Department of the Navy
2020-02-10
-
Department of the Navy Information Superiority Vision
From the Introduction: "War is intrinsically unpredictable. We reduce the fog of war by gathering information. We increase the enemy's friction by creating uncertainty. In maneuver warfare, a commander masses distributed forces to decisively engage the enemy's critical vulnerabilities to remove his center of gravity. Success depends on rapidly understanding the environment and enemy to make decisions faster than the adversary. [...] Information Superiority is delivering the right information to the right hands, ready to observe, orient, decide, and act faster than the adversary. It provides freedom of action within the Information Environment for friendly forces and prevents interference by the opposing force. As noted by Admiral Michael M. Gilday, the 32nd Chief of Naval Operations, in the Design for Maintaining Maritime Superiority, our Fleet will be a potent, formidable force that competes around the world every day, deterring those who would challenge us while reassuring our allies and partners. Commanders must maintain decision-making superiority and expand our digital competitive advantage."
United States. Department of the Navy
2020-02
-
Time to Update Our Strategic Vision and Goals
From the Online Blog: "After two years serving as your Secretary of the Navy, it is time to update the department's vision and goals. We've accomplished a lot together, and we need to keep looking forward. The return of great power competition is testing our readiness and capabilities in ways we haven't seen in a generation. We have to be ready to fight tonight in every part of the world, and in every domain, as one integrated naval force. The department's new vision gets to the heart of this. The credible and immediate presence of the Navy and Marine Corps within all operational domains ensures the security and prosperity of the American people and preserves open access to the global commons. The expeditionary character of our Sailors and Marines is an indispensable component of the Joint Force. As such, we can expect America's adversaries to continue to erode our maritime advantage through every means at their disposal."
United States. Department of the Navy. Office of the Chief of Information
Spencer, Richard V.
2019-11-07
-
Secretary of the Navy: Cybersecurity Readiness Review
From the Document: "On October 12, 2018, the Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) directed a comprehensive cybersecurity review following several significant compromises of classified and sensitive information. The task was to examine the Department of the Navy (DON) current cyberspace governance structures to assess if they are optimally focused, organized, and resourced to prevent or mitigate future incidents. The team was specifically directed to examine the DON cybersecurity posture as well as the organizational and industrial environments in which previous events occurred. Finally, the review team was charged with investigating end-to-end cybersecurity processes to assess the alignment of authority, accountability, and responsibility within the DON. To fully understand the current cybersecurity posture, this review examined the shift of national defense strategy, to include past and present information strategies, cyber strategies, cyber policies, and guidance across all elements of the government that has occurred since the 2017 National Security Strategy and 2018 National Defense Strategy's acknowledged return to global peer rivalry."
United States. Department of the Navy
2019-03
-
IT CAST Symposium 2019 Program
From the Document: "It's a pleasure to welcome you to the 2019 Software and IT-CAST [Information Technology Cost Analysis Solutions Team] Symposium! It comes as no surprise that innovation in software and information technology -- whether it be new products, processes or services -- marches along. The United States Government, long past the time of dictating and leading innovation, faces a crossroads; how does it keep apace to this new reality? Adding to the troubles is that cost has the dubious problem of being an unrecognized stakeholder. Resource allocation, financial information, and performance-based tracking is imperative for success and is a tenuous balancing act in acquisition, cost, and program management activities. Luckily, through this symposium and other venues we are tackling these inequities and searching for solutions that are aligned with the more traditional stakeholders."
United States. Department of the Navy; Naval Center for Cost Analysis (U.S.); United States. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
2019
-
Department of the Navy Combating Trafficking in Persons Policy
This Department of the Navy Office of the Secretary Instruction serves to "[e]stablish policy, procedures, and responsibilities for the Department of the Navy (DON) Combating Trafficking in Persons (CTIP) program per references (a) through (t) in enclosure (1). This is the initial issuance of this instruction and should be read in its entirety."
United States. Department of the Navy
2018-12-13
-
Software and IT‐CAST (2018)
From the Overview: "The Naval Center for Cost Analysis (NCCA) and the National Geospatial‐Intelligence Agency Corporate Assessment and Program Evaluation (NGA CAPE) present the Software and Information Technology Cost Analysis Solutions Team (Software and IT‐CAST) meeting from August 22‐24, 2017 at the Lockheed Martin Global Vision Center in Crystal City, Virginia. This meeting is organized with the support of Lockheed Martin, and DOD cost agencies. The Software and IT‐CAST meeting is a venue to build coalitions with government and industry, to exchange cost data, share lessons learned, and establish best practices concerning software and information technology cost estimation."
United States. Department of the Navy; Naval Center for Cost Analysis (U.S.); United States. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
2018-08-21
-
Joint Task Force Guantanamo: Mission and History
This report provides an overview of detention operations, treatment of detainees, services provided, and a brief history of the Joint Task Force Guantanamo (JTF-GTMO). "JTF-GTMO conducts safe, humane, and legal detention operations; collects, analyzes and reports intelligence; and supports legal and administrative proceedings in order to protect the United States and its interests."
United States. Joint Task Force Guantánamo; United States. Department of Defense; United States. Department of the Army . . .
2018-07
-
Department of the Navy Strategic Roadmap for Unmanned Systems (Short Version)
"Unmanned and autonomous systems will create fundamental shifts in the way that the Department of Navy (DON) conducts naval operations. Integration of unmanned and autonomous capabilities offers many advantages such as reducing personnel and manpower, risk to personnel, and operating costs, as well as offering greater persistence and range, improved speed and accuracy of data processing, and supporting a faster decision cycle. Unmanned and autonomous technologies will become a powerful and ubiquitous force multiplier in an integrated human-machine team."
United States. Department of the Navy
2018?
-
Strategic Readiness Review 2017
"This report responds to your direction to conduct a Strategic Readiness Review following the recent tragic incidents involving U.S. 7th Fleet ships that resulted in significant loss of life and injury. The attached report contains specific recommendations for your consideration as you determine the way ahead for our nation's Navy. We assembled a team of senior civilian executives and former senior military officers to conduct the review. The team examined issues of governance, accountability, operations, organizational structure, and manning and training over the past three plus decades to identify trends and contributing factors that have compromised performance and readiness of the fleet. We considered stresses on the force over time, significant changes to training, risk management processes, and how Navy culture has evolved. Our team reviewed past incidents and accidents and conducted numerous interviews with subject matter experts from across the government and with relevant leaders from the private sector in our areas of interest. The team specifically sought experts who have dealt with and responded to similar operational circumstances and events. Our Strategic Review examined the findings of the CNO's [Chief of Naval Operations] Comprehensive Review and we largely concur with its recommendations, however our assessments, judgments and recommendations are independent of that work."
United States. Department of the Navy
2017-12-03
-
Report on the Collision Between USS Lake Champlain (CG 57) and Fishing Vessel Nam Yang 502
"USS LAKE CHAMPLAIN (CG 57) collided with fishing vessel NAM YANG 502 on 9 May 2017 in the Sea of Japan. LAKE CHAMPLAIN is a Ticonderoga Class Guided Missile Cruiser homeported in San Diego, California. Approximately 400 Sailors serve aboard LAKE CHAMPLAIN. LAKE CHAMPLAIN is 567 feet in length, 55 feet wide, and carries a gross tonnage of approximately 10,200 tons. NAM YANG 502 is a fishing vessel with an unknown crew size. NAM YANG 502 is approximately 60 feet in length, 15 feet wide, and carries a gross tonnage of approximately 10 tons. NAM YANG 502 was en route to the Republic of Korea prior to the collision. The collision between LAKE CHAMPLAIN and NAM YANG 502 resulted in no injuries. Each vessel sustained minor hull damage."
United States. Department of the Navy
2017-11-29
-
COMNAVSURFPAC Instruction 3040.1: Significant Event/Near-Miss Reporting
"Purpose. To promulgate guidance, procedures and requirements for significant event and near-miss critique conduct and reporting. Significant event/near-miss reporting is a key supporting element of the sound shipboard operating principles of integrity, procedural compliance, formality, questioning attitude, forceful backup, and level of knowledge. This instruction provides a structured process for conducting critiques and reporting significant events/near-misses via a critique report in order to: a. Improve shipboard readiness through the conduct of a significant event/near-miss critique. b. Improve Pacific Surface Force readiness by disseminating the reports from this process. c. Instill a culture of continuous improvement, promote better understanding of the sound shipboard operating principles, and gain proficiency in root cause analysis to improve warfighting effectiveness."
United States. Department of the Navy
2017-09-18
-
Soviet Navy: Intelligence and Analysis During the Cold War
From the Document: "This collection of documents, spanning three decades from the 1960s to the 1980s, focuses on CIA's collection and analysis of the Soviet Navy. [...] Many of the documents in this collection reflect the tensions in the bipolar Cold War and specifically focus on the Soviet Navy's development of its naval forces during that timeframe. After World War II, U.S. leaders faced a nuclear armed rival and in no time, Soviet tanks were in the streets of Budapest, and the first Sputnik satellite was launched. Understanding how the Soviet Union envisioned the next combat situation required in-depth knowledge of both their high-level theory of warfare and probable tactical behavior. The collection will provide new insight into the Agency's analysis of the evolving Soviet Navy and its military posture during the Cold War."
United States. Central Intelligence Agency; United States. Department of the Navy
2017-09-06?
-
Software and IT‐CAST Proceedings (2017)
From the Overview: "The Naval Center for Cost Analysis (NCCA) and the National Geospatial‐Intelligence Agency Corporate Assessment and Program Evaluation (NGA CAPE) present the Software and Information Technology Cost Analysis Solutions Team (Software and IT‐CAST) meeting from August 22‐24, 2017 at the Lockheed Martin Global Vision Center in Crystal City, Virginia. This meeting is organized with the support of US Army ARDEC [Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center], Lockheed Martin, and DOD cost agencies. The Software and IT‐CAST meeting is a venue to build coalitions with government and industry, to exchange cost data, share lessons learned, and establish best practices concerning software and information technology cost estimation."
United States. Department of the Navy; Naval Center for Cost Analysis (U.S.); United States. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
2017-08-22
-
Joint Publication 4-01: The Defense Transportation System
"This publication provides joint doctrine to plan, command and control, and employ resources within the Defense Transportation System. This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS). It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations, and it provides considerations for military interaction with governmental and nongovernmental agencies, multinational forces, and other interorganizational partners. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs), and prescribes joint doctrine for operations and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing and executing their plans and orders. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of objectives."
United States. Department of the Army; United States. Department of the Navy; United States. Marine Corps . . .
2017-07-18
-
Joint Publication 2-01: Joint and National Intelligence Support to Military Operations
"This publication provides doctrine for joint and national intelligence products, services, assessments, and support to joint military operations. This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS). It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations, and it provides considerations for military interaction with governmental and nongovernmental agencies, multinational forces, and other interorganizational partners. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs), and prescribes joint doctrine for operations and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing and executing their plans and orders. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of objectives."
United States. Department of the Army; United States. Department of the Navy; United States. Marine Corps . . .
2017-07-05
-
Surface Force Strategy: Return to Sea Control
"As today's leading naval power, we cannot afford to lose our Nation's seapower edge. The U.S. Navy is responding to global challenges under the leadership of the Chief of Naval Operations and is guided by the precepts of our 'Design for Maintaining Maritime Superiority.' Responding to the call to 'strengthen naval power at and from the sea,' the U.S. Naval Surface Force submits this 'Surface Force Strategy.' The strategy describes the return to sea control and implementation of Distributed Lethality as an operational and organizational principle for achieving and sustaining sea control at will. Sea control is the precondition for everything else we must do as a navy. Distributed Lethality reinforces fleet initiatives that drive collaboration and integration across warfighting domains. Distributed Lethality requires increasing the offensive and defensive capability of surface forces, and guides deliberate resource investment for modernization and for the future force. Providing more capabilities across surface forces yields more options for Geographic Combatant Commanders in peace and war. In order to achieve the desired outcome of this strategy, we must rededicate the force to attain and sustain sea control, retain the best and the brightest, develop and provide advanced tactical training, and equip our ships with improved offensive weapons, sensors, and hard kill/soft kill capabilities. Pursuing these ends will enhance our capability and capacity to go on the offensive and to defeat multiple attacks. By providing a more powerful deterrent, we will dissuade the first act of aggression, and failing that, we will respond to an attack in kind by inflicting damage of such magnitude that it compels an adversary to cease hostilities, and render it incapable of further aggression."
United States. Department of the Navy
2017-01-09
-
SECNAV Instruction 5000.34F: Oversight of Intelligence Activities, Intelligence-Related Activities, Special Access Programs, and Sensitive Activities Within the Department of the Navy, January 3, 2017
The purpose of this instruction is to "establish policy and assign responsibility for the oversight and management of intelligence activities, intelligence-related activities, Special Access Programs (SAPs), and sensitive activities within the Department of the Navy (DON). [...] DON oversight shall encompass not only a legal review for compliance with U.S. law, treaty, policy, directive, and regulation, but also a broad review of intelligence activities, intelligence-related activities, sensitive activities, and SAPs which includes, at a minimum, goals, objectives, and resources."
United States. Department of Defense; United States. Department of the Navy
2017-01-03
-
SECNAV Instruction 3850.2E: Department of the Navy Counterintelligence, January 3, 2017
"This instruction provides policy and defines specific responsibilities for Counterintelligence (CI) in the Department of the Navy (DON), per references (a) through (ag) . This instruction has been revised and should be read in its entirety. [...] The DON and its components shall integrate CI activities into all operations, programs, systems, exercises, plans, doctrine, strategies, policies, and architectures to detect, identify, assess, exploit, and deny Foreign Intelligence Entities (FIE) and their insiders targeting or exploiting DON information, personnel, operations and other activities per references (a) through (g)."
United States. Department of Defense; United States. Department of the Navy
2017-01-03
-
U.S. Navy Program Guide 2017
"'The U.S. Navy is ready to execute the Nation's tasks at sea, from prompt and sustained combat operations to everyday forward-presence, diplomacy and relief efforts. We operate worldwide, in space, cyberspace, and throughout the maritime domain. The United States is and will remain a maritime nation, and our security and prosperity are inextricably linked to our ability to operate naval forces on, under and above the seas and oceans of the world.' To that end, the Navy executes programs that enable our Sailors, Marines, civilians, and forces to meet existing and emerging challenges at sea with confidence. Six priorities guide today's planning, programming, and budgeting decisions: (1) maintain a credible, modern, and survivable sea based strategic deterrent; (2) sustain forward presence, distributed globally in places that matter; (3) develop the capability and capacity to win decisively; (4) focus on critical afloat and ashore readiness to ensure the Navy is adequately funded and ready; (5) enhance the Navy's asymmetric capabilities in the physical domains as well as in cyberspace and the electromagnetic spectrum; and (6) sustain a relevant industrial base, particularly in shipbuilding."
United States. Department of the Navy
2017
-
Littoral Operations in a Contested Environment
"The purpose of this concept is to describe 'naval operations in the littoral environment in light of emerging threats' in order to provide a unified framework for Navy-Marine Corps innovation. It places a renewed emphasis on fighting for and gaining sea control, to include employing sea-based and land-based Marine Corps capabilities to support the sea control fight. [...] This concept introduces ideas on how naval forces could be organized, trained and equipped to enhance their ability to operate in contested littoral environments. Included among those ideas are: additional, versatile force options; a wider application of existing doctrine; and the more flexible employment of current, emerging, and some potential capabilities. To confirm their integral merit, the ideas put forth in this concept require further testing and refinement through detailed wargaming, experimentation, and exercises. It is expected that these activities will invigorate and advance naval operational art and stimulate creativity on how to exploit the inherent synergy of integrated Navy and Marine Corps capabilities. Of particular importance, practical application of the concept during live exercises will allow naval forces to identify the inevitable seams and capability limitations that must be resolved."
United States. Department of the Navy; United States. Marine Corps
2017
-
Joint Publication 3-08: Interorganizational Cooperation
"This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS). It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations, and it provides considerations for military interaction with governmental and nongovernmental agencies, multinational forces, and other interorganizational partners. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs), and prescribes joint doctrine for ope rations and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing and executing their plans and orders. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of objectives."
United States. Department of the Army; United States. Department of the Navy; United States. Marine Corps . . .
2016-10-12
-
Software and IT‐CAST Proceedings (2016)
From the Overview: "The Naval Center for Cost Analysis and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency presents the Software and Information Technology Cost Analysis Solutions Team (Software and IT CAST) meeting from August 22-24, 2016 at the Lockheed Martin Global Vision Center in Crystal City, Virginia. This meeting is organized with the support of US Army ARDEC [Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center], Lockheed Martin, and DOD cost agencies. The Software and IT-CAST meeting is a venue to build coalitions with government and industry, to exchange cost data, share lessons learned, and establish best practices concerning software and information technology cost estimation."
United States. Department of the Navy; Naval Center for Cost Analysis (U.S.); United States. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
2016-08-22
-
Department of the Navy Cyberspace Information Technology and Cybersecurity Workforce Management And Qualification Manual
"1. PURPOSE. This manual reissues reference (a) in accordance with the authority conferred by references (b), (c), and (d) to implement policy, update assigned responsibilities, and establish mandatory procedures for uniform identification, management and qualification of the Department of the Navy (DON) Cyberspace IT and Cybersecurity Workforce (Cyber IT/CSWF). References (a) through (t) pertain to Cyber IT/CSWF and are contained in Chapter 1. 2. APPLICABILITY. This manual applies to the Office of the Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV), the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO), the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC), all U.S. Navy (USN) and U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) installations, commands, activities, and field offices, and all other organizational entities within the DON."
United States. Department of the Navy. Office of the Chief of Information
2016-06-30
