Advanced search Help
Searching for terms: EXACT: "United States. Department of Defense" in: publisher
Clear all search criteria
Only 2/3! You are seeing results from the Public Collection, not the complete Full Collection. Sign in to search everything (see eligibility).
-
Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering: Implications for the Development of New Warfare Agents
This report addresses the following issues and provides the basis for more detailed discussion of funding and program priorities, particularly in the area of medical biological defense research: the national security threats posed by such potential developments of new agents through advances in biotechnology and genetic engineering; recommendations related to reducing the impact of progress in these areas; the utility of increased emphasis on research and development of medical countermeasures related to mid-term or far-term biowarfare threat agents; and other measures that could reduce the threat of these technological advances and reduce the threat of biological agent and weapons proliferation.
United States. Department of Defense
1996
-
Chemical and Biological Defense Primer
The following is a October 2001 document prepared by the DoD's Chemical and Biological Defense Program describing CBW Characteristics, chemical and biological warfare agents, and current CBW threats.
United States. Department of Defense
2001-10
-
Department of Defense: Biological Defense Program Needs for Strategic Biotechnology Development
This presentation gives an overview of the principles of biological defense. Potential Biological Weapons Agents, a historical perpsective on the DoD CB defense program, biodefense vaccines, Homeland Security inititatives, and other issues concerning the development and use of BW and vaccines against BW are all outlined in this presentation. Evolving challenges related to this topic are as follows: supporting homeland security roles and missions, enhancing CB installation force protection, acceleration of CB defense technologies, maintaining current programs to respond to warfighter requirements, and cooperation/strategy with HHS on vaccine development and deployment.
United States. Department of Defense
2002-04-30
-
DoD Directive 3025.15: Military Assistance to Civil Authorities
This Directive establishes DoD policy and assigns responsibilities for providing military assistance to civil authorities.
United States. Department of Defense
1997-02-18
-
DoD Directive 1330.5: American National Red Cross
This Directive reissues DoD Directive 1330.5, September 27, 1954, to update its provisions with regard to Department of Defense support service authorized for Red Cross personnel and their dependents, including commissary store and exchange privileges, hospitalization and medical care, recreation facilities, dependent's schools, and Armed Forces postal services, and incorporate technical and editorial changes.
United States. Department of Defense
1969-08-16
-
DoD Directive 3150.8: DoD Response to Radiological Accidents
This Directive replaces reference DoD directive 5100.52, "DoD Response to an Accident or Significant Incident Involving radioactive Materials, " December 21, 1989 and updates policy and responsibilities for responding to a radiological accident. Promulgates DoD policy and planning guidance to implement reference Federal Emergency Management Agency, "Federal Radiological Emergency Response Plan (FRERP), "April, 1996. Authorizes publication of DoD 3150.8-M, "Radiological response Procedures, " in accordance with reference DoD 5025.1-M "DoD Directives System Procedures, " August 1994, authorized by DoD Directive 5025.1, June 24, 1994.Continues to authorize publication of reference DoD 5100.52-M, "Nuclear Weapon Accident Response Procedures (NARP)," September 1990, authorized by this Directive in accordance with reference DoD 5025-M, "DoD directives System Procedures, "August 1994, authorized by DoD Directive 5025.1, June 24, 1994.
United States. Department of Defense
1996-06-13
-
DoD Directive 3150.5: DoD Response to Improvised Nuclear Device (IND) Incidents
This Directive update policies and procedures for the DoD response to IND incidents, to implement the DoD technical responsibilities, and to amplify the direction concerning law enforcement and other associated responsibilities.
United States. Department of Defense
1987-03-24
-
DoD Directive 1400.31: DoD Civilian Work Force Contingency and Emergency Planning and Execution
This Directives reissues reference DoD directive 1400.31, "Mobilization Management of the DoD civilian Work Force, " September 9, 1986 to update and establish DoD policies, and assigns responsibilities for implementing this Directive under the statutory authority for emergency planning and preparedness, and management functions of the DoD civilian work force.
United States. Department of Defense
1995-04-28
-
DoD Directive 3020.26: Continuity of Operations (COOP) Policy and Planning
This Directive updates responsibilities to ensure effective performance of critical DoD missions and continuation of mission-essential functions during emergencies.
United States. Department of Defense
1995-05-26
-
DoD Directive 3005.7: Emergency Requirements, Allocations, Priorities, and Permits for DoD Use of Domestic Civil Transportation
This Directive updates DoD policy and guidance concerning emergency requirements, allocations, priorities, and permits governing DoD use of civil transportation within the continental United States (CONUS), except civil transportation provided by the Civil Reserve Air Fleet and related to civil works projects performed by the Corps of Engineers.
United States. Department of Defense
1985-05-30
-
DoD Directive 2000.15: Support to Special Events
This Directive supersedes references Assistant Secretary of Defense Memorandum, "DoD Defense Support to International Special Events, " August 12, 1993 through (g). Establishes policy and assigns responsibilities for managing DoD support to international and national special events.
United States. Department of Defense
1994-11-21
-
DoD Hazardous Materials Information System Procedures
This manual provides the procedures for the operation of the DoD Hazardous
Materials Information System as prescribed in DoD Instruction 6050.5, Hazardous
Material Information System. The system provides the basic reference data necessary for use by DoD to comply with the more stringent regulatory controls established for hazardous materials. These include such areas as worker safety, transportation, and environmental considerations. The procedures contained herein are mandatory for use by the DoD components and for other Federal agencies that are participating
in this system.
United States. Department of Defense
1981-07
-
Department of Defense Federal Hazard Communication Training Program Student's Workbook
This publication is issued under the authority of, and in accordance with DoD Instruction 6050.5, "Hazardous Material Information System" January 25, 1978. This publication, "Department of Defense Federal Hazard Communication Training Program, Student Workbook, " when used with "Department of Defense Federal Hazard Communication Training Program, Trainer's Guide" and the associated 90-minute videotape provides training resources to help DoD comply with the training requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Hazard Communication Standard (29 C.F. R. 1910. 1200).
United States. Department of Defense
1988-04
-
Report on Allied Contributions to the Common Defense (1999)
This Report presents the Department of Defense assessment of the relative contributions toward common defense and mutual security made by our NATO allies, our key partners in the Pacific (Japan and the Republic of Korea), and the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). This report responds to the requirements set forth in the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (P.L. 105-261), Title XII, Section 1233, Defense
Burdensharing, paragraphs a-c. Additionally, this Report covers burdensharing reporting requirements set forth in the Department of Defense Military Construction Appropriations Act (P.L. 105-237), Section 119. In its discussion of "Legislative Provisions Adopted" in the Strom Thurmond Act, Congress directed the Secretary to provide a Report to Congress on "National Security Bases for Forward Deployment and Burdensharing Relationships." The baseline legislation for this requirement is the FY1997 National Defense Authorization Act, Title X, Section 1084. In that provision, Congress requests an analysis of forward deployment options, and related force structures and costs (paragraphs c-e). Such information is beyond the scope of this Report, but
readers are advised that the information is available in more comprehensive departmental reports.
These include the National Defense University's 1998 Strategic Assessment (on alternative
basing options and related force structures); and in the Department of Defense OP-53 Exhibit, Defense Overseas Funding, which addresses DOD worldwide overseas costs. Under legislative provisions dating to the Defense Authorization Act of 1981 (P.L. 96-342, Section 1006), the Department of Defense is required to compare the defense burdens borne
by our allies, explain disparities, and describe efforts to eliminate such disparities.
United States. Department of Defense
1999-03
-
Department of Defense Chemical and Biological Defense Program: Volume II: FY 2001-2003 Performance Plan
The Department of Defense (DoD) Chemical and Biological Defense Program (CBDP) has prepared this performance plan to align itself more closely with the tenets of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA). Specifically, the plan: Establishes explicit and outcome-oriented goals linked to warfighters' ability to survive, fight, and win in a CB environment; Identifies quantitative and/or qualitative performance measures that can be used to assess progress towards goal achievement; Describes how performance data is validated; Describes how RDT&E activities of participating DOD and non-DOD organizations are coordinated to achieve program goals; and Identifies human capital, financial, and resource challenges or external factors that limit the ability of the program to achieve its goals. The major portions of this performance plan link performance goals with performance measurements in terms of those systems and programs, which support the warfighter requirements and goals. Section 1 provides the vision, mission, goals and performance measures for the CBDP. Section 2 analyzes performance goals and measurements that support the advanced development and acquisition phases of CB defense systems. Section 3 analyzes the science and technology base of the program to include basic and applied research and advanced technology development, which support essential capabilities meeting warfighter requirements. Performance goals, which support each corporate level goal of the CBDP, establish a measurable path to incremental achievement of specific goals. These performance goals are supported and evaluated by measurable outputs, which are assessed using performance measures. Performance measures quantify the output of the CB defense program for key measures associated with providing a ready force, capable of conducting operations in CB contaminated environments.
United States. Department of Defense
2002-04
-
Joint Service Chemical and Biological Defense Program: FY00-FY01 Overview
In an effort to provide a concise description of the Department of Defense's (DoD) Chemical and Biological Defense Program (CBDP), this pamphlet has been developed to highlight major program efforts, inlcluding a summary of FY99 accomplishments and goals for FY2000 and beyond. Training and doctrine needs to improve readiness are also outlined here. Contents include Global Threat, Threat to Military Missions, Management Stuctures, Funding, Commodity Area Overview, Contamination Avoidance, Decontamination, Protection, Medical Issues, Modeling and Simulation, and Additional Information.
United States. Department of Defense
2000
-
Integrated Chemical and Biological Defense Research, Development and Acquisition Plan: Chemical & Biological Point Detection and Decontamination (April 2002)
"The Integrated Chemical and Biological Defense Program Research, Development and Acquisition Plan for the Departments of Defense and Energy: Bio Point Detection, published in March 2001, presented the first technology area-focused roadmap. The narrower and more detailed scope of the roadmap reports serves the second and equally important purpose of the effort. The technology area roadmaps are "living" documents intended to facilitate coordination and cooperation between DOE and DoD at both the high level of national policy and planning and at the working level in the technology focus areas. They depict participating organization R&D programs and plans for testing and transitioning technologies into the acquisition process. Program data comes from existing planning documents in many cases; however, it should be noted that appearance within the roadmap does not imply funding commitments. Rather, the integration of these efforts into a single planning document represents a significant step toward a more formal, unified, long-term investment strategy. This second report is responsive to the above guidance. It includes both an expanded bio point detection roadmap, which now covers chemical point detection as well, and the decontamination roadmap (see Figure 1 for progress to date). In addition, the Technical Support Working Group (TSWG), the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) provided input to this year's report. Intelligence community representatives have participated in Focus Group meetings. Coordination has begun with the Nonproliferation and Arms Control Technology Working Group (NPAC TWG)."
United States. Department of Defense
2002-04
-
Joint Service Chemical and Biological Defense Program: FY02-03 Overview
This document provides an overview of Chemical and Biological Defense Program (CBDP) major focus area efforts, providing a summary of FY01 accomplishments and goals set for FY02 and beyond. An additional
publication, the DoD Annual Report to Congress on the Chemical and Biological Defense Program, provides
a more detailed look at programmatic accomplishments as well as the roadmap to the future. The FY03 budget request provides funding for a number of new Homeland Security initiatives; including a Center for Biological Terrorism Research, a comprehensive program to build a National Biological Defense System for the Office of Homeland Security, a Joint Service Installation Protection Project, and continued equipping of the 32 WMD Civil Support Teams.
United States. Department of Defense
2002
-
Joint Warfighting Science and Technology Plan, Chapter 12: Counterproliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction
Section 1 of this chapter, Chemical/Biological Defense, focuses on passive defense and consequence management in scenarios involving chemical and biological threats. Section 2, Counter Weapons of Mass Destruction, focuses on nonproliferation and counterforce against the full spectrum of WMD threats. Other aspects of counterproliferation capabilities, as defined by the Counterproliferation Program Review Committee (Reference 24), are addressed in the Information
Superiority (Chapter IV), Air and Missile Defense (Chapter VII), Combating Terrorism (Chapter XIII), and Hard and Deeply Buried Target Defeat (Chapter XV) JWCOs.
United States. Department of Defense
2002-02
-
Report on the Integrated Chemical and Biological Research, Development and Acquisition Plan for the Departments of Defense and Energy: Bio Point Detection (March 2001)
This report serves a dual purpose. First, it fulfills Counterproliferation Program Review Committee (CPRC) and Congressional coordination and reporting requirements1 for the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Department of Energy (DOE) in the area of chemical and biological defense (CBD) research, development and acquisition (RDA). The first CBD RDA report published in April 20002 explained the rationale for and genesis of interagency coordination via the CPRC-chartered CBD RDA Focus Group and the roles and responsibilities of DoD and DOE and other agencies. This report focuses in detail on a specific technology areabiological point detection. It is this narrower and more detailed scope that allows the report to serve its second and equally important purpose. This report is a "living" document intended to facilitate coordination and cooperation between DOE and DoD at both the high level of national policy and planning and at the working level in the area of biological point detection. report achieves these objectives through a detailed "roadmap" that depicts R&D programs within the DoD Chemical and Biological Defense Program (CBDP), Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the DOE Chemical and Biological National Security Program (CBNP) as well as plans for testing and transitioning technologies into the acquisition process through FY10.
United States. Department of Defense
2001-03
-
Counterproliferation Program Review Committee Annual Report to Congress: Executive Summary (1995)
"The recommendations of the 1994 NPRC report constitute an integrated, top level plan to improve the overall capability of the United States in countering the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Although it will take a period of years to implement all of the NPRC recommendations, the represented organizations have taken a number of actions since the report was submitted. The CPRC can report that progress has been made over the past year in many areas leading toward a strengthening of U.S. capabilities for countering proliferation. This strengthening includes implementing initiatives that will lead to rapid fielding of essential capabilities and improved integration, management, and oversight of programs related to countering proliferation."
United States. Department of Defense
1995
-
Counterproliferation Program Review Committee Annual Report to Congress: Executive Summary (1994)
In accordance with NDAA 94, this report provides a top-down overview of existing, planned and proposed capabilities and technologies, as well as a description of priorities, programmatic options and other issues. Other than Nunn-Lugar activities, this report specifically excludes activities and programs for dealing with extant weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver them in the Former Soviet Union (FSU) and China, but does address non/counterproliferation activities and programs for dealing with issues germane to the proliferation of WMD through illicit export of materials, technology, and expertise from FSU states. The report discusses ongoing and planned Agency programs and activities that are unique to the non/counterproliferation problem as well as those that are strongly related. The funding summaries presented for these efforts are estimates. The report focuses on the non/counterproliferation capabilities to support US policy goals.
United States. Department of Defense
1994
-
DoD Chemical/Biological Defense Program Overview: Presentation to the National Academy of Sciences Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology
This presentation reiterates Rumsfeld's statement that "We need to prepare, as an Alliance, for the full range of asymmetric threats: new forms of terrorism, ... and nuclear,
chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction. All of
these are emerging dangers. None can be ignored. We need to prepare, as an Alliance, for the full range of
asymmetric threats: new forms of terrorism, ... and nuclear, chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction. All of these are emerging dangers. None can be ignored. It should be of particular concern to all of us that the list of
countries which today support global terrorism overlaps significantly with the list of countries that have weaponized chemical and biological
agents, and which are seeking nuclear,
chemical and biological weapons--and
the means to deliver them." An overview of the CBDP vision is given here, along with current capabilities in detection and a list of acronyms at the end of the presentation.
United States. Department of Defense
Johnson-Winegar, Anna
2002-04-07
-
Report on Allied Contributions to the Common Defense (2002)
This Report presents the Department of Defense's annual assessment of the relative contributions toward the common defense and mutual security made by our NATO allies, our Pacific allies (Japan and the Republic of Korea), and the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) - Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Under legislative provisions dating back to the Defense Authorization Act of 1981
(Public Law 96-342, Section 1006), the Secretary of Defense has provided an annual report to Congress comparing the defense burdens borne by our allies, explaining disparities, and describing efforts to eliminate such disparities. This year's Report also covers responsibility sharing requirements in the FY 2002 Department of Defense Military Construction
Appropriations Act (Public Law 107-64, Section 119).
United States. Department of Defense
2002-06
-
Report on Allied Contributions to the Common Defense (2001)
This Report presents the Department of Defense's annual assessment of the relative contributions toward the common defense and mutual security made by our NATO allies, our Pacific allies (Japan and the Republic of Korea), and the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Under legislative provisions dating back to the Defense Authorization Act of 1981
(Public Law 96-342, Section 1006), the Secretary of Defense has provided an annual report to Congress comparing the defense burdens borne by our allies, explaining disparities, and describing efforts to eliminate such disparities. This year's Report also covers responsibility sharing requirements in the FY 2001 Department of Defense Military Construction Appropriations Act (Public Law 106-246, Section 119).
United States. Department of Defense
2001-03
-
Report on Allied Contributions to the Common Defense (2000)
This Report presents the Department of Defense assessment of the relative contributionstoward the common defense and mutual security made by our NATO allies, our Pacific allies,
(Japan and the Republic of Korea), and the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).Under legislative provisions dating to the Defense Authorization Act of 1981 (P.L. 96-342, Section 1006), the Department of Defense is required to compare the defense burdens borne by our allies,explain disparities, and describe efforts to eliminate such disparities. This Report addresses
requirements originally set forth in the 1984 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 98-525),
Title X, Section 1003, Defense Burdensharing, paragraphs a-d. The most recent baselinelegislation addressing this reporting requirement is the FY 1997 National Defense Authorization Act, Title X, Section 1084. This Report also covers burdensharing reporting requirements set forth in the FY 2000 Department of Defense Military Construction Appropriations Act (P.L. 106-52),
Section 119. For the last four years, beginning with the FY 1997 Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 104-
201), Congress has recognized that there are multiple and diverse ways in which allies may share the responsibility for achieving mutual security objectives. The Department looks forward to continuing to work with the Congress in structuring a comprehensive and balanced framework
within which to evaluate allied contributions to common defense and mutual security.
United States. Department of Defense
2000-03
-
DoD Directive 8500.1: Information Assurance (IA)
This Directive: 1. Establishes policy and assigns responsibilities under Section 2224 of title 10, United States Code to achieve Department of Defense (DoD) information assurance (IA) through a defense-in-depth approach that integrates the capabilities of personnel, operations, and technology, and supports the evolution to network centric warfare. 2. Supersedes DoD Directive 5200.28, DoD 5200.28-M, DoD 5200.28-STD, and DoD Chief Information Officer (CIO) Memorandum 6-8510. 3. Designates the Secretary of the Army as the Executive Agent for the integration of common biometric technologies throughout the Department of Defense. 4. Authorizes the publication of DoD 8500.aa-M consistent with DoD
5025.1-M.
United States. Department of Defense
2002-10-24
-
DoD Directive 5200.27: Acquisition of Information Concerning Person and Organizations not Affiliated with the Department of Defense
This Directive reissues reference DoD Directive 5200.27, subject as above, December 8, 1975 (hereby canceled) to establish for the Defense Investigative Program general policy, limitations, procedures, and operational guidance pertaining to the collecting, processing, storing, and disseminating of information concerning persons and organizations not affiliated with the Department of Defense.
United States. Department of Defense
1980-01-07
-
DoD Directive 5200.2: DoD Personnel Security Program
This Directive reissues reference DoD Directive 5200.2, subject as above, December 20, 1979 (hereby canceled). Updates the policy and responsibilities for the DoDPSP under references Public Law 81-831, "Internal Security Act of 1950, "September 23, 1950 (Section 781 of title 50, United States Code). Continues to authorize the publication of DoD 5200.0-R reference (g) ), in accordance with DoD 5025.1-M (reference (h)).
United States. Department of Defense
1999-04-09
-
DoD Directive 5200.8: Security of DoD Installation and Resources
This Directive reissues DoD Directive 5200.8, "Security of Military Installations and Resources," July 29, 1980 (hereby cancelled) and designates the military commanders of property or places under their commands, in accordance with Section Act of property or places under their command, in accordance with Section 797 or 501 U.S.C (Section 21 of the "Internal Security Act of 1950") (enclosure 1). Authorize the publication of DoD 5200.8-R, "Physical Security Program, " in accordance with reference DoD 5025.1-M, "DoD Directives System Procedures, " December 1990, authorized by DoD Directive 5025.1, December 23, 1988, to establish consistent minimum standards for the protection of DoD installations and resources. Replaces references DoD Instruction 5210.71, "Security of Selected Sensitive Inventory Items--Drugs, Abuse Items, and Precious Metals, " August 28, 1987 (hereby canceled) and DoD Directive 5210.73, "Security of DoD Communications facilities, " April 30, 1984 (hereby canceled), and incorporates necessary requirements of those DoD issuance into DoD 5200.8-R.
United States. Department of Defense
1991-04-25
