Advanced search Help
Searching for terms: EXACT: "United States. Department of Defense" in: publisher
Clear all search criteria
Only 2/3! You are seeing results from the Public Collection, not the complete Full Collection. Sign in to search everything (see eligibility).
-
Department of Defense Instruction 5505.19: Establishment of Special Victim Investigation and Prosecution (SVIP) Capability within the Military Criminal Investigative Organizations (MCIOs), February 3, 2015 [Incorporating Change 2, March 23, 2017]
"It is DoD policy that: [a.] A timely, effective, worldwide SVIP [Special Victims' Counsel Programs] capability consisting of specially trained MCIO [Military Criminal Investigative Organizations] investigators will work collaboratively with assigned SVIP personnel from other disciplines and investigate all covered offenses that occur within their jurisdiction as established by existing Service and MCIO guidance, subject to limitations concerning use of Restricted Reports. [b.] MCIO investigators will collaborate with assigned specially trained judge advocates, DoD Sexual Assault Response Coordinators (SARCs), Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocates (SAPR VAs), Family Advocacy Program (FAP) managers, and domestic abuse victim advocates (DAVAs ), as appropriate, during all stages of the investigative and military justice process for covered offenses. [c.] Nothing in this instruction prohibits a MCIO from investigating any offense under existing authorities; however, only covered offenses will be designated as SVIP incidents. [d.] All criminal investigative files will be maintained in accordance with the DoD privacy policies in DoDD 5400.11and DoD 5400.11-R (References (e) and (f))."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-03-23
-
Department of Defense Instruction 5205.83: DoD Insider Threat Management and Analysis Center (DITMAC), March 30, 2017
"The DITMAC [DoD Insider Threat Management and Analysis Center]: [a.] Establishes and operates an automation-assisted enterprise-level capability for managing and analyzing insider threat information across the law enforcement, personnel security, human resources, counterintelligence, physical security, network behavior monitoring, and cybersecurity activities of all the components of the Department of Defense, pursuant to Executive Order 13587. [b.] In accordance with Executive Order 13587 and DoD Directive 5205.16, integrates and centrally analyzes key threat-related information on the threat that insiders may pose to DoD and U.S. Government installations, facilities, personnel, missions, or resources; including damage to the United States through espionage, terrorism, unauthorized disclosure of national security information, or through the loss or degradation of departmental resources or capabilities."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-03-30
-
Department of Defense Manual 4100.39: Federal Logistics Information System (FLIS) Procedures
From the "Applicability" section: "This issuance applies to: {A] OSD [Office of the Secretary of Defense], the Military Departments (including the Coast Guard at all times, including when it
is a Service in the Department of Homeland Security by agreement with that Department), the
Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, the Combatant
Commands, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense
Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities within the DoD (referred
to collectively in this issuance as the 'DoD Components'). [B] Use of the FCS [Federal Catalog System] by federal agency organizations participating with the DoD Components in the Federal Catalog Program (FCP), for a uniform system of item identification; but only when and to the extent they adopt the terms of this issuance. The federal agency organizations described in this paragraph are referred to collectively in this issuance as 'participating agencies.' [C} Use of the FCS by North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member nations and other foreign governments and agencies participating with the DoD Components in the FCP pursuant to NATO Standardization Agreement (STANAG) 3150, for a uniform system of item identification; but only when and to the extent they adopt the terms of this issuance. The NATO member nations and other foreign governments and agencies described in this paragraph are referred to collectively in this issuance as 'participating countries.'"
United States. Department of Defense
2017-03-08
-
Report to Congress on Strategy to Protect United States National Security Interests in the Arctic Region
From the Executive Summary: "The Department of Defense (DoD) remains committed to working collaboratively with allies and partners to promote a balanced approach to improving security in the Arctic region. DoD's strategy in the Arctic builds upon the 2009 National Security Presidential Directive 66/Homeland Security Presidential Directive 25, 'Arctic Region Policy', and the 2013 'National Strategy for the Arctic Region (NSAR)'. DoD's 2013 'Arctic Strategy' nested under those two overarching national-level guidance documents. DoD's 2016 'Arctic Strategy' updates DoD's 2013 'Arctic Strategy' as required by Section 1068 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2016 (P.L. 114-92) in light of significant changes in the international security environment. It refines DoD's desired end-state for the Arctic: a secure and stable region where U.S. national interests are safeguarded, the U.S. homeland is defended, and nations work cooperatively to address challenges. The two main supporting objectives remain unchanged: 1) Ensure security, support safety, promote defense cooperation; and 2) prepare to respond to a wide range of challenges and contingencies-operating in conjunction with like-minded nations when possible and independently if necessary-in order to maintain stability in the region. This update also adds a classified annex."
United States. Department of Defense
2016-12
-
DoDI 3300.07: Defense Intelligence Foreign Language and Regional and Culture Capabilities
"In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5143.01, this issuance: 1. Establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides guidance for the management and use of foreign language and regional and culture capabilities of Military Service members and DoD civilian personnel performing intelligence, counterintelligence, security, sensitive activities, and all other Defense Intelligence-related matters, in accordance with DoDD 5160.41E and Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) 630. 2. Designates a principal lead to oversee the Defense Intelligence Components foreign language and regional and culture capabilities matters and be the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence (USD(I)) representative to the Defense Language Steering Committee (DLSC), in accordance with DoDD 5160.41E."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-02-14
-
Selected Acquisition Report (SAR): E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Aircraft (E-2D AHE) as of FY 2015 President's Budget
"The E-2D AHE [Advanced Hawkeye Aircraft] program was granted authority on March 1, 2013 to commence Full Rate Production (FRP). A contract for production of the first FRP lot of five E-2D AHE aircraft was awarded on July 24, 2013. [...] The program plans to have an In-Progress Review conducted by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition in the second quarter of FY 2014 prior to proceeding with the FRP Lot 2 production contract which is planned to be a Multi-Year Procurement (MYP). A Secretary of Defense certification for a MYP of 32 E-2D AHE aircraft during FY 2014-2018 was made on March 1, 2013, and the FY 2014 National Defense Authorization Act contains E-2D AHE MYP authority language. The FY 2015 PB [President's Budget] provides for 25 MYP aircraft. The FY 2014 RDT&E [Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation] budget reduction adds risk to meeting the planned AR [Acquisition Report] IOC [Initial Operational Capability]. There are no significant software-related issues with this program at this time."
United States. Department of Defense
2014-04-16
-
Department of Defense Directive 5148.13: Intelligence Oversight
"In accordance with the direction in the July 11 and December 23, 2014, Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandums and consistent with DoD Directives (DoDDs) 5105.82 and 5148.11, this issuance: Establishes policies, assigns responsibilities, and provides procedures for employee conduct and identifying, investigating, and reporting questionable intelligence activities (QIAs) and significant or highly sensitive matters (S/HSMs); Prescribes the intelligence oversight responsibilities and functions, relationships, and authorities of the DoD Senior Intelligence Oversight Official (SIOO); Prescribes the responsibilities and relationships of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, the General Counsel of the Department of Defense (GC DoD), and the DoD Component heads regarding intelligence oversight."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-04-26
-
DoDI 6490.13: Comprehensive Policy on Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Neurocognitive, September 11, 2015, Incorporating Change 1, Effective March 31, 2017
"In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5124.02 (Reference (a)), reissues DoD Instruction (DoDI) 6490.13 (Reference (b)) to establish policy, assign responsibilities, and prescribe standard elements, pursuant to section 722 of Public Law 111-383 (Reference (c)), requiring the implementation of a comprehensive neurocognitive assessment policy in the Military Services. [It also designates] the Army as the Military Health System (MHS) Lead Service for the testing required by the DoD Neurocognitive Assessment Program for the Military Services."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-03-31
-
DoDM 7730.47, Volume 2: Defense Incident-Based Reporting System (DIBRS): Supporting Codes, December 7, 2010, Incorporating Change 2, April 6, 2017
"This Manual is composed of two volumes, each containing its own purpose, and reissues DoD 7730.47-M (Reference (a)). The purpose of the overall Manual, in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5124.02 (Reference (b)), is to implement the policy in DoDD Instruction 7730.47 (Reference (c)) and to assign responsibilities and prescribe procedures for managing DIBRS. This Volume provides instructions for creating DIBRS offense information including the State, offense, property description, and prison facility codes and the data element dictionary. This Volume applies to OSD, the Military Departments, the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities within the Department of Defense."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-04-06
-
Department of Defense Instruction 2200.01: Combating Trafficking in Persons (CTIP), April 21, 2015 [Incorporating Change 1, April 5, 2015]
From the Purpose and Applicability statements: "In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive 5124.02 (Reference (a)), this instruction reissues DoD Instruction 2200.01 (Reference (b)) to establish policy and assign responsibilities for CTIP, and implement National Security Presidential Directive 22 (Reference (c))." [...] "This instruction applies to OSD [Office of the Secretary of Defense], the Military Departments, the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS) and the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands (CCMDs), the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense (OIG DoD), the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities within the DoD (referred to collectively in this instruction as the 'DoD Components')."
United States. Department of Defense
2015-04-21
-
DoDI 5505.08: Military Criminal Investigative Organizations (MICO) and Other DoD Law Enforcement Organizations Investigations of Adult, Private, Consensual Sexual Misconduct, April 17, 2013, Incorporating Change 1, Effective March 23, 2017
This document incorporates a change in DoDI 5505.08. "This instruction: a. Reissues DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5505.8 (Reference (a)) in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive 5106.0 1 (Reference (b)) to establish policy, assign responsibilities, and provide procedures for the initiation of criminal investigations into adult, private, consensual sexual misconduct, as defined in this instruction. b. Incorporates the repeal of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy in accordance with Public Law 111- 321 (Reference (c))."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-03-27
-
DoDM 5210.42: Nuclear Weapons Personnel Reliability Program, January 13, 2015, Incorporating Change 2, Effective March 23, 2017
"This manual reissues DoD 5210.42-R (Reference (a)) as a DoD manual in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive 5134.08 (Reference (b)). It implements the policy in DoD Instruction 5210.42 (Reference (c)), assigns responsibilities, and prescribes mandatory procedures for the DoD Nuclear Weapons Personnel Reliability Program (PRP) to ensure the safety and security of the U.S. nuclear deterrent mission."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-03-27
-
DoDI 5505.11: Fingerprint Card and Final Disposition Report Submission Requirements
"This instruction: a. Reissues DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5505.11 (Reference (a)) in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive 5106.01 (Reference (b)). b. Updates established policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures in accordance with part 20 of Title 28, Code of Federal Regulations and section 534 of Title 28, United States Code (U.S.C.) (References (c) and (d)) for defense criminal investigative organizations (DCIOs) and other DoD law enforcement organizations to report offender criminal history data to the Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for inclusion in the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) criminal history database."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-03-30
-
DoDI 1325.02: Desertion and Unauthorized Absence (UA), November 16, 2012, Incorporating Change 1, March 31, 2017
"This Instruction reissues DoD Directive 1325.2 (Reference (a)) as a DoD Instruction in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive 5124.02 (Reference (b)) to update established policy, assigned responsibilities, and prescribed procedures designed to reduce desertion, UA [Unauthorized Absence], or designation as absent without leave (AWOL) of military personnel."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-03-31
-
DoDI 55005.16: Criminal Investigations by Personnel Who Are Not Assigned to a Defense Criminal Investigation Organization
"This Instruction establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides instructions in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5106.01 (Reference (a)) and Appendix 3 of Title 5, United States Code (also known as 'The Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended' (Reference (b))) for DoD Components that employ personnel who are conducting criminal investigations who are not assigned to a defense criminal investigative organization (DCIO)."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-03-28
-
DoDI 6400.07: Standards for Victim Assistance Services in the Military Community, November 25, 2013, Incorporating Change 1, April 3, 2017
"This instruction, in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5124.02 (Reference (a)): [...] Establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and sets standards for victim assistance services within the military community. These standards are consistent with the 'Standards for Victim Assistance Programs and Providers' (Reference (b)) established by the National Victim Assistance Standards Consortium, but incorporate the unique needs of the military community. [It also establishes] the DoD Victim Assistance Leadership Council, referred to in this instruction as 'the Council.'"
United States. Department of Defense
2017-04-03
-
Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-012: Interim Policy Guidance for DoD Physical Access Control, December 8, 2009, Incorporating Change 7, Effective April 17, 2017
"In accordance with (IAW) the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5143.01 (Reference (a)), this DTM establishes DoD access control policy and the minimum DoD security standards for controlling entry to DoD installations and stand-alone facilities (hereafter referred to as installations) to implement section 1069 of Public Law 110-181 (Reference (b)). These standards and their implementation status shall be reported to Congress as required and the standards shall be implemented in the continental United States (CONUS) to include Alaska, Hawaii, its territories, and possessions no later than October 1, 2010, as resources, law, and capabilities permit. This DTM is effective immediately, and shall be incorporated into DoD 5200.08-R (Reference (c)) and DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5200.08 (Reference (d)). This DTM shall expire effective February 28, […] 2018."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-04-17
-
DoD 5240.01-R: Procedures Governing the Activities of DoD Intelligence Components that Affect United States Persons, December 1982, Incorporating Change 2, Effective April 26, 2017
"This DoD regulation sets forth procedures governing the activities of DoD intelligence components that affect United States persons. It implements DoD Directive 5240.1, and replaces the November 30, 1979 version of DoD Regulation 5240.1-R. It is applicable to all DoD intelligence components. Executive Order 12333, 'United States Intelligence Activities,' stipulates that certain activities of intelligence components that affect U.S. persons be governed by procedures issued by the agency head and approved by the Attorney General. Specifically, procedures 1 through 10, as well as Appendix A, herein, require approval by the Attorney General. Procedures 11 through 15, while not requiring approval by the Attorney General, contain further guidance to DoD Components in implementing Executive Order 12333 as well as Executive Order 12334, 'President's Intelligence Oversight Board'. Accordingly, by this memorandum, these procedures are approved for use within the Department of Defense. Heads of DoD components shall issue such implementing instructions as may be necessary for the conduct of authorized functions in a manner consistent with the procedures set forth herein. This regulation is effective immediately."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-04-26
-
DoD Directive 5205.82: Defense Institution Building (DIB), January 27, 2016, Change 1 Effective: May 4, 2017
"This issuance: Establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides direction regarding the planning, management, and conduct of DIB [Defense Institution Building] by DoD, in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5111.1; the November 30, 2006, Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum; DoDD 5132.03; DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5000.68; and Titles 10 and 22, United States Code (U.S.C.). [It also] [establishes] the DIB Coordination Board."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-05-04
-
Department of Defense Instruction 2000.12: DoD Antiterrorism (AT) Program, March 1, 2012 [Incorporating Change 1, May 8, 2017]
From the document: " This Instruction: a. Reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 2000.12 (Reference (a)) as a DoD Instruction (DoDI) in accordance with the authority in DoDD 5111.1 (Reference (b)) and Secretary and Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandums (References (c) and (d)), to establish policy, assign responsibilities, and prescribe procedures for the DoD AT [Antiterrorism] Program. b. Implements in part section 134 of title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.) (Reference (e)), which provides that the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (USD(P)) shall have overall direction and supervision for policy, program planning and execution, and allocation and use of resources for DoD combating terrorism (CbT) activities. c. Incorporates the following actions from Acting Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Memorandum (Reference (f)): (1) Transfer of the DoD AT Program to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Americas' Security Affairs (ASD(HD&ASA)). (2) Designation of ASD(HD&ASA) as the lead OSD official for implementation of the 1997 Memorandum of Understanding Between DoD and Department of State for Security of DoD Elements and Personnel in Foreign Areas (Reference (g)). d. Replaces the Antiterrorism Coordinating Committee Senior Steering Group with the Mission Assurance Senior Steering Group (SSG). The Mission Assurance Coordination Board Terms of Reference (Reference (h)) describes the composition, roles, responsibilities, working groups, and procedures of the SSG. e. Incorporates elements of and cancels DoD O-2000.12-H (Reference (o)). Reference (o) is replaced by the DoD Antiterrorism Officer Guide (Reference (bk)). f. Incorporates and cancels the August 2010 Secretary of Defense Memorandum on DoD force protection (FP) responsibilities (Reference (s)) by reinforcing the requirement for DoD Components to comply with geographic Combatant Commanders' authority to set FP conditions in their areas of responsibility (AOR), and requiring the geographic Combatant Commanders to share threat assessment requirements with DoD Components in their AORs, other geographic Combatant Commands, and the Defense Combating Terrorism Center (DCTC)."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-05-08
-
Department of Defense Directive 3025.13: Employment of DoD Capabilities in Support of the U.S. Secret Service (USSS), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), October 8, 2010 [Incorporating Change 1, May 4, 2017]
"It is DoD policy that: [a.] The Department of Defense will provide services, equipment, and facilities in support of the USSS [U.S. Secret Service] when performing its protective duties under section 3056 of title 18, United States Code (U.S.C.), and Public Law 94-524, as amended (References (b) and (c), respectively), when requested by the Director of the USSS and approved by the Secretary of Defense. Such support
is an express exception to section 1385 of Reference (b) (also known and hereafter referred to as 'The Posse Comitatus Act') and is authorized by Reference (c). [...] [d.] At a minimum, USSS requests for support shall be evaluated based on their legality, lethality, risk, cost, propriety, and impact on military readiness."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-05-04
-
Department of Defense Directive 3600.01: Information Operations (IO), May 2, 2013 [Incorporating Change 1, May 4, 2017]
"It is DoD policy that: [a.] IO [Information Operations] will be the principal mechanism used during military operations to integrate, synchronize, employ, and assess a wide variety of information-related capabilities (IRCs) in concert with other lines of operations to effect adversaries' or potential adversaries' decision-making while protecting our own. [b.] IRCs constitute tools, techniques, or activities employed within a dimension of the information environment (IE) that can be used to achieve a specific end at a specific time and place. IRCs can include, but are not be limited to, a variety of technical and non-technical
activities that intersect the traditional areas of electronic warfare, cyberspace operations, military information support operations (MISO), military deception (MILDEC), influence activities, operations security (OPSEC), and intelligence."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-05-04
-
Washington Headquarters Services Fire Regulations (WHSFR), May 18, 2011, Incorporating Change 1, May 8, 2017
"In accordance with the authority in Reference (a) and the guidance in References (bc) through (fg), this Administrative Instruction (AI): a. Implements policy, establishes responsibilities, and provides procedures to prescribe the minimum requirements necessary to establish a reasonable level of fire and life safety and property protection from the hazards created by fire, explosion, and dangerous conditions within Washington Headquarters Services (WHS) facilities. b. Adopts by reference the latest edition of the WHSFRs, as published by the Office of the Pentagon Fire Marshal (OPFM) on its website at https://fire.whs.mil, under the delegated authority of the Director, Facilities Services Directorate (FSD)."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-05-08
-
MQ-4C Triton Unmanned Aircraft System (MQ-4C Triton)
"The MQ-4C Triton is an Acquisition Category ID program that entered System Development and Demonstration (SDD) based on a Milestone (MS) B [Acquisition] [Decision] Memorandum (ADM) issued on April 18, 2008. The program conducted a successful System Requirements Review in January 2009, System Functional Review in June 2009, Integrated Baseline Review in July 2009, Preliminary Design Review in February 2010, Critical Design Review in February 2011, and Flight Readiness Review in March 2013. First flight of the MQ-4C Triton was successfully conducted in May 2013. In August 2013, Australia signed a FMS Planning Case with the program office. This FMS case will assist Australia in validating that the MQ-4C Triton will meet their specific requirements. The program received approval from the Milestone Decision Authority to award the Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) option to the SDD contract for the System Demonstration Test Article (SDTA) lot of aircraft and associated ground stations. The November 1, 2011 ADM directed the Navy to rename this lot of aircraft from LRIP Lot 1 to SDTAs in keeping with their intended purpose, to finish system developmental test and to support Operational Evaluation (OPEVAL). During this reporting period, the MQ-4C Triton program entered formal flight test and continues to conduct system integration testing in preparation for an Operational Assessment in 2015. Fifteen surrogate risk reduction flights were completed this year on a Gulfstream testbed for the Multi-Function Active Sensor (MFAS) radar. Production of the SDTA aircraft continued in 2013."
United States. Department of Defense
2013-12
-
DoDI 3000.12: Management of U.S. Global Defense Posture (GDP) [May 8, 2017]
"In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5111.1 and the direction in the November 30, 2006, Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum, this issuance: Establishes policies, defines processes, and assigns responsibilities for managing U.S. GDP pursuant to the guidance in the February 28, 2008, Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum. Establishes the Global Posture Executive Council (GPEC) as the DoD oversight body for GDP, including DoD Components, the Department of State Bureau of Political-Military Affairs (DOS/PM), and the National Security Council Staff (NSCS)."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-05-08
-
Department of Defense Directive 5205.14: DoD Counter Threat Finance (CTF) Policy, August 19, 2010 [Incorporating Change 3, May 4, 2017]
"This Directive: [a.] In accordance with section 113 of title 10, United States Code (Reference (a)) and consistent with Presidential Policy Directive No. 1 (Reference (b)), establishes DoD policy and assigns DoD responsibilities for countering financing used to engage in terrorism, illicit trafficking networks, and related activities that support an adversary's ability to negatively affect U.S. interests. [b.] Incorporates and cancels Directive-Type Memorandum 08-034 (Reference (c))."
United States. Department of Defense
2017-05-04
-
DoDD 3222.04: Electronic Warfare (EW) Policy, March 26, 2014, Incorporating Change 1, Effective May 10, 2017
"This directive reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 3222.4 (Reference (a)) to update EW [Electronic Warfare] policy, definitions, and responsibilities within the DoD for providing operational forces with EW capabilities to 'demonstrate electromagnetic superiority across the range of military operations. These capabilities include electronic warfare support (ES), electronic protection (EP), and electronic attack (EA) weapon systems.'"
United States. Department of Defense
2017-05-10
-
DoD Instruction 6040.47: Joint Trauma System (JTS), September 28, 2016
"Purpose: In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive 5124.02, this issuance: [1] Establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides procedures to develop and maintain an enduring global trauma care capability that supports a full range of military operations, including a comprehensive DoD Trauma Registry (DoDTR). [2] Establishes the Secretary of the Army as the Military Health System (MHS) Lead Agent for trauma care and recognizes the JTS[Joint Trauma System] as a DoD Center of Excellence (DCoE). [3] Establishes an integrated Combatant Command (CCMD) Trauma System (CTS) modeled after the Joint Theater Trauma System (JTTS), and a requirement to input data into the DoDTR to support unique CCMD mission requirements."
United States. Department of Defense
2016-09-28
-
Department of Defense Manual 4140.68: Integrated Materiel Management of Nonconsumable Items [Incorporating Change 2, Effective September 28, 2016]
"In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive 5134.12 (Reference (a)), this manual: a. Implements the requirements and procedures consistent with DoD Instruction (DoDI) 4140.01 (Reference (b)) for integrated materiel managers (IMMs) and others who work within or with the DoD supply system to assist in the elimination of duplicate national inventory management functions for those nonconsumable items being used by more than one DoD Component or participating federal agency. b. Provides uniform guidance and describes operating procedures for applying primary inventory control activity (PICA) and secondary inventory control activity (SICA) materiel management objectives to assure that only one DoD Component will provide certain logistics support functions to all registered users of the same nonconsumable items, except for those exclusions covered in paragraph 2b of this issuance."
United States. Department of Defense
2016-09-28
-
Strategic Plan 2016 - 2025 Science and Technology Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Program
"Twenty years since the founding of the DOD Non‐Lethal Weapons (NLW) Program, the United States military faces global responsibilities in an increasingly interconnected yet uncertain world. In this environment of rapid technological change and challenges to the status‐quo, the Joint Force will continue to be tasked to subdue emerging threats and respond to humanitarian crises alongside, if not among, civilian populations. To accomplish these tasks, warfighters require NLW capabilities to respond to potential threats between 'shouting and shooting' and to control the escalation‐of‐force, while minimizing collateral damage - capabilities the Joint Non‐Lethal Weapons Program (JNLWP) is investing in today. […] This JNLWP S&T Strategic Plan (JSTSP) articulates a direction for future JNLWP S&T investment to spark innovation and cooperative research and development partnerships across industry, academia, and government. To better promote communication and clarity of ideas for future NLW S&T efforts, this plan begins by outlining the strategic context of potential future operating environments and some of the unique aspects of NLW technology development. The JSTSP then defines a series of JNLWP Science and Technology Objectives (STOs) based on validated and emerging Joint Force requirements and shaped by future operating concepts. These STOs will act as guideposts for JNLWP S&T investment through 2025. The JNLWP intends that the plan will be reviewed every two years, or as necessary, to refresh the STOs based on technological advancements and evolving needs. This approach will enable the JNLWP S&T Program to remain on the cutting‐edge of technology, while retaining alignment with new realities about emergent operations."
United States. Department of Defense
2016
