Advanced search Help
Searching for terms: EXACT: "United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services" in: publisher
Clear all search criteria
Only 2/3! You are seeing results from the Public Collection, not the complete Full Collection. Sign in to search everything (see eligibility).
-
Current and Future Worldwide Threats to the National Security of the United States: Hearing before the United States Senate, Committee on Armed Services, One Hundred and Seventh Congress, First Session, March 8, 2001
This testimony compilation is from the March 8, 2001 hearing "Current and Future Worldwide Threats to the National Security of the United States," before the United States Senate Committee on Armed Services. From the statement of George J. Tenet: "As I reflect this year on the threats to American security, what strikes me most forcefully is the accelerating pace of change in so many arenas that affect our nation's interests. Numerous examples come to mind: new communications technology that enables the efforts of terrorists and narcotraffickers as surely as it aids law enforcement and intelligence, rapid global population growth that will create new strains in parts of the world least able to cope, the weakening internal bonds in a number of states whose cohesion can no longer be taken for granted, the breaking down of old barriers to change in places like the Koreas and Iran, the accelerating growth in missile capabilities in so many parts of the world--to name just a few. Never in my experience has American intelligence had to deal with such a dynamic set of concerns affecting such a broad range of US interests. Never have we had to deal with such a high quotient of uncertainty. With so many things on our plate, it is important always to establish priorities. For me, the highest priority must invariably be on those things that threaten the lives of Americans or the physical security of the United States. With that in mind, let me turn first to the challenges posed by international terrorism." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: George J. Tenet, Director of Central Intelligence and Thomas R. Wilson, Director, Defense Intelligence Agency.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2001-03-08
-
Testimony on Current and Future Worldwide Threats to the National Security of the United States, hearing before the United States Senate, Committee on Armed Services, One Hundred and Sixth Congress, Second Session, February 3, 2000
This testimony compilation is from the February 3, 2000 hearing, "Testimony on Current and Future Worldwide Threats to the National Security of the United States," U.S. Senate, Committee on Armed Services. From the statement of George Tenet: "Mr. Chairman, as we face a new century, we face a new world. A world where technology, especially information technology, develops and spreads at lightning speed--and becomes obsolete just as fast. A world of increasing economic integration, where a US company designs a product in Des Moines, makes it in Mumbai, and sells it in Sydney. A world where nation-states remain the most important and powerful players, but where multinational corporations, nongovernment organizations, and even individuals can have a dramatic impact. This new world harbors the residual effects of the Cold War--which had frozen many traditional ethnic hatreds and conflicts within the global competition between two superpowers. Over the past 10 years they began to thaw in Africa, the Caucasus, and the Balkans, and we continue to see the results today. It is against this backdrop that I want to describe the realities of our national security environment in the first year of the 21st century: where technology has enabled, driven, or magnified the threat to us; where age-old resentments threaten to spill-over into open violence; and where a growing perception of our so-called 'hegemony' has become a lightning rod for the disaffected. Moreover, this environment of rapid change makes us even more vulnerable to sudden surprise." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: George J. Tenet, Director, Central Intelligence Agency and Thomas R. Wilson, Director, Defense Intelligence Agency.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2000-02-03
-
Testimony on the Current and Future Worldwide Threats to the National Security of the United States, hearing before the United States Senate, Committee on Armed Services, One Hundred and Sixth Congress, First Session, February 2, 1999
This testimony compilation is from the February 2, 1999 hearing, "Testimony on the Current and Future Worldwide Threats to the National Security of the United States," U.S. Senate, Committee on Armed Services. From the statement of George Tenet: "US citizens and interests are threatened in many arenas and across a wide spectrum of issues. What is noteworthy is the manner in which so many issues are now intertwined and so many dangers mutually reinforcing. Why is this so? To some degree it involves historic legacies fueled by the continued crumbling of Cold War constraints. We see this in the ongoing turmoil of the Balkans, the increasing violence in Africa, and the renewed volatility of the Subcontinent. But in today's world, these problems fester amidst new dangers--dangers that flow from new factors, such as the increasing availability of sophisticated technology and the ease and speed with which it can be applied by those hostile to the United States. In a very real sense, we live at a moment when the past and the future are colliding. In other words, today we must still deal with terrorists, insurgents, and others who have hundreds of years of history fueling their causes--but chances are they will be using laptop computers, sophisticated encryption, and weaponry their predecessors could not even have imagined." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: George J. Tenet, Director, Central Intelligence Agency and Patrick M. Hughes, Director, Defense Intelligence Agency.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
1999-02-02
-
Restoring American Power: Recommendations for the FY 2018-FY 2022 Defense Budget
From the Executive Summary: "This paper offers a general blueprint to begin rebuilding and reshaping our military. It is not cheap-roughly $430 billion of new money above the Obama administration's defense budget for the next five years, which is already more than $100 billion above the budget caps in law. The cost of further inaction, however, is worse: We will irreparably damage our military's ability to deter aggression and conflict. Indeed, as General Mark Milley, Chief of Staff of the Army, has said: 'The only thing more expensive than deterrence is actually fighting a war, and the only thing more expensive than fighting a war is fighting one and losing one.'"
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
McCain, John, 1936-
2017-01-16
-
United States Southern Command and United States Northern Command, Hearing Before the Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate, One Hundred Fifteenth Congress, First Session, April 6, 2017
This testimony compilation is from the April 6, 2017 hearing, "United States Southern Command and United States Northern Command" before the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services. The purpose of this hearing was to provide updates regarding the work of U.S. Southern Command and U.S. Northern Command in defending U.S. homeland and regional security and stability. Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Kurt W. Tidd and Lori J. Robinson.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2017-04-06
-
National Commission on the Future of the United States Army, Hearing Before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourteenth Congress, Second Session, February 11, 2016
This testimony compilation is from the February 11, 2016 hearing on "National Commission on the Future of the United States Army" before the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services. From the statement of John McCain: "Through fifteen years of war, our Army has been tested. But time and time again, our soldiers proved their commitment, courage, and determination. It is our duty to our utmost to provide them the support they need and deserve. That starts by recognizing that our Army is still at war. At this moment, 187,000 soldiers are deployed in 140 locations around the globe. They're fighting terrorists and training our partners in Afghanistan and supporting the fight against ISIL [Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant] all while defending South Korea and reassuring our allies in Eastern Europe. Yet as the demands on our Army continue to increase, our support for our soldiers has not kept pace. In short, our Army is confronting growing threats and increasing operational demands with shrinking and less ready forces and aging equipment. By the end of the next fiscal year, the Army will be cut down to 450,000 Active Duty personnel soldiers, down from a wartime peak of 570,000. These budget driven force reductions were decided before the rise of ISIL or Russia's invasion of Ukraine. And as the commission notes, a regular Army of 450,000 is the minimum sufficient force necessary. We must be clear that when we minimize our Army, we maximize the risks to our soldiers. Those risks will only grow worse if mindless sequestration cuts are allowed to return and the Army shrinks to 420,000 soldiers. On the present course, we are running the risk that in a crisis, we will have too few soldiers who will enter a fight without proper training or equipment." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Carter F. Ham, Thomas R. Lamont, James D. Thurman, and Raymond F. Chandler III.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2016-02-11
-
Aviation Readiness, Hearing Before the Senate Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourteenth Congress, Second Session, July 6, 2016
This testimony compilation is from the July 6, 2016 hearing "Aviation Readiness," before the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness. From the prepared statement of Lieutenant General Jon M. Davis, Deputy Commandant for Aviation: "We are going through a period of risk for Marine Aviation. Since the end of official combat operations in both Iraq and Afghanistan, we have thus far been able to fulfill our responsibilities and make our steady state Global Force Management operational commitments by risking the readiness of squadrons remaining in the United States. Squadrons deploy on time with the required training and readiness levels to be safe and meet the minimum for tactical proficiency (T2.0). However, these deploying squadrons, along with those next to deploy, are the 'Fight Tonight' force. In fact, 13 of the last 27 squadrons deployed at a T-rating less than 2.0. Marine Corps aviation is designed as a lean but highly ready force. We don't do tiered readiness. We can't afford to since our squadrons are always ready to deploy. We are designed to do a lot with a little -- and the only way we can do that is to maintain the required levels of flight line inventory, and ensure those aircraft have the spare parts and quality maintenance we need to meet our force in readiness requirements. Today, there are not enough flyable aircraft--our 'Ready Bench'--if our nation were subjected to a crisis." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Lieutenant General Jon M. Davis, Rear Admiral Upper Half Michael C. Manazir, Lieutenant General Kevin W. Mangum, and Major General Scott D. West.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2016-06-14
-
Navy Shipbuilding Programs, Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Seapower of the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourteenth Congress, Second Session, April 6, 2016
This testimony compilation is from the April 6, 2016 hearing "Navy Shipbuilding Programs," before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Seapower of the Committee on Armed Services. From the prepared statement of Sean J. Stackley: "The Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 President's Budget submission is governed by the 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), which implements the 2012 Defense Strategic Guidance (DSG) and continues our efforts to ensure our ability to protect the homeland, build security globally, project power and win decisively. As described in the Chief of Naval Operations' 'A Design for Maintaining Maritime Superiority' and the Commandant of the U.S. Marine Corps' 'Advance to Contact', today's strategic environment is dramatically more globalized with accelerating change. Global connections continue to multiply, fueled by rapid advances and proliferation in technology, particularly information technology. Our competitors are pursuing advanced weapon systems at levels and a pace of development that we have not seen since the mid-1980s. It is imperative that we fund a force that can fight and win against any of our five major challenges (Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and Global Counter-Terrorism), investing in advanced capabilities that increase our lethality, for both the current and future force. This budget addresses that imperative by making investments to sustain our ability to fight with decisive capability over the full range of operations-- at sea, from the sea, and across all domains. [...] Our Nation's away team, the Navy and Marine Corps, continues to stand the watch with an operational tempo that keeps nearly half of our Fleet underway every day. We must continually adapt to the emerging security environment to ensure our military's reach, presence, capability, and resolve to maintain this pace of operations remains superior in today's and tomorrow's world." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Sean J. Stackley, Joseph P. Mulloy, and Robert S. Walsh.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2016-04-06
-
Nomination Hearing: James Mattis, Secretary of Defense, Hearing Before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifteenth Congress, First Session, January 12, 2017
This is a testimony compilation of the January 12, 2017 hearing on "Nomination Hearing: James Mattis, Secretary of Defense" held before the Senate Committee on Armed Services. From the opening statement of John McCain: "All of us recognize the unique, indeed historic, nature of this nomination. General Mattis enjoyed a long and distinguished career in uniform, but current law would bar him from serving as Secretary of Defense for three more years. While I support retaining that law, I also believe that our nation needs General Mattis's service more than ever. So after this hearing, the Committee will meet to consider special legislation to allow General Mattis to serve as Secretary of Defense." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: James N. Mattis.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2017-01-12
-
Russian Influence and Unconventional Warfare Operations in the "Grey Zone": Lessons from Ukraine, Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifteenth Congress, First Session, March 29, 2017
This testimony compilation made by the HSDL staff is from the March 29, 2017 hearing, "Russian Influence and Unconventional Warfare Operations in the 'Grey Zone': Lessons from Ukraine," before the United States Senate Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Committee on Armed Services. The purpose of this hearing was to, "address the topic of Russian influence and unconventional warfare operations in the 'grey zone:' lessons from Ukraine." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Olga Oliker, Michael R. Carpenter, and Charles T. Cleveland.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2017
-
Department of Defense Laboratories and Their Contributions to Military Operations and Readiness, Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifteenth Congress, First Session, May 3, 2017
This testimony compilation is from the April 26, 2017 hearing on "Department of Defense Laboratories and Their Contributions to Military Operations and Readiness" before the United States Senate Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Committee on Armed Services. From the opening statement of Joni Ernst: "Today, we will receive testimony on the Department of Defense laboratories and their contribution to military operations and readiness. I am pleased we have Dr. Melissa Flagg, Dr. Jeffrey Holland, Dr. John Montgomery, and Mr. Ricky Peters with us here today. Thank you very much for being on our panel. I look forward to their testimony, and I hope they are not only able to talk about the importance of laboratories but also the unique role our universities and the private sector play in advancing research and development for our Department of Defense. From personal protective equipment and lighter radio batteries for our infantry to directed energy, the technology researched and developed today will ensure we continue to outmatch our adversaries tomorrow." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Melissa L. Flagg, Jeffery P. Holland, John A. Montgomery, and Ricky L. Peters.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2017-05-03
-
Military Space Organization, Policy, and Programs, Hearing before the Subcommittee on Strategic Forces of the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifteenth Congress, First Session, May 17, 2017
This testimony compilation is from the May 17, 2017 hearing on "Military Space Organization, Policy, and Programs," before the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services. From the opening statement of Senator Deb Fischer (NE): "The committee meets today to receive testimony on space organization, policy, and programs. [...] Space-based capabilities are integral to the way our military operates and our society functions. As previous hearings in this subcommittee have documented, our adversaries are developing increasingly sophisticated ways to attack U.S. space assets and exploit the domain for their own purposes." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Heather A. Wilson, David L. Goldfein, John W. Raymond, and Samuel A. Greaves.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2017-05-17
-
Posture of the Department of the Army, Hearing Before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifteenth Congress, First Session, May 25, 2017
This testimony compilation is from the May 25, 2017 hearing on "Posture of the Department of the Army" before the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services. The purpose of this hearing was to present the current status of U.S. Army operations and the Fiscal Year 2018 budget request. Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Robert M. Speer and Mark A. Milley.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2017-05-25
-
Department of Defense Policies and Programs to Combat Terrorism: Hearing before the U.S. Senate, Committee on Armed Services, March 24, 2000
This testimony compilation from the March 24, 2000 hearing, "Department of Defense Policies and Programs to Combat Terrorism," before the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee. From Brian Sheridan's statement: "I am pleased to have the opportunity to update you, from a policy and operational perspective, on the way that the Department of Defense has organized itself to support the US Government's combating terrorism mission. Since I spoke with you a year ago the Department has continued to assess and improve the way that we organize and structure ourselves to combat the threat of terrorism both at home and abroad. The Department of Defense has made substantial progress, but terrorism will remain a continuing challenge in a volatile and violent world. The battle against terrorism requires effective coordination within our own government and between our government and law-abiding nations around the globe. At home it requires a close coordination between Federal, State and local authorities and even more importantly a strong partnership between the Executive and Legislative branches. I would like to commend the Senate Armed Services Committee for recognizing the increasing importance that non-traditional forms of warfare like terrorism increasingly play in our national security. I look forward to the opportunity today to build on our partnership." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Brian E. Sheridan, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict; Admiral Harold W. Gehman Jr., USN, Commander in Chief, U.S. Joint Forces Command, Charles L. Cragin, Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs, and Pamela B. Berkowsky, Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Civil Support.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2000-03-24
-
United States Senate Armed Services Committee [website]
"This web site is intended to serve as a resource for those looking for information about the [Senate Armed Services] Committee and its activities." The site includes information about the committee and subcommittee members, committee publications, hearings, and press releases. The committee's jurisdiction includes: "Aeronautical and space activities peculiar to or primarily associated with the development of weapons systems or military operations; the common defense; the Department of Defense, the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy, and the Department of the Air Force, generally; maintenance and operation of the Panama Canal, including administration, sanitation, and government of the Canal Zone; military research and development; national security aspects of nuclear energy; naval petroleum reserves, except those in Alaska; pay, promotion, retirement, and other benefits and privileges of members of the Armed Forces, including overseas education of civilian and military dependents; selective service system; and strategic and critical materials necessary for the common defense."
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
-
Fiscal Year 2016 Missile Defense Hearing, Hearing before the U.S. House Committee on Armed Services, One Hundred Fourteenth Congress, First Session, March 19, 2015
This is the testimony compilation from the March 19, 2015 hearing, "Fiscal Year 2016 Missile Defense Hearing," before the U.S. House Committee on Armed Services. From the statement of Brian McKeon: "I will begin with a discussion of ballistic missile threats and other trends, and then focus on several key policy priorities: defending the United States against limited long-range ballistic missile attacks, strengthening defense against regional missile threats, fostering defense cooperation with partners, and examining how to advance the missile defense technology base in a cost-effective manner." Statements, letters and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Brian McKeon, Bill Gortney, James Syring and David Mann.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2015-03-19
-
Fiscal Year 2014 National Defense Authorization Budget Request from the Department of the Navy, Hearing Before the U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on the Armed Services, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, First Session, April 16, 2013 [video]
This testimony compilation is from a April 16, 2013 hearing, "Fiscal Year 2014 National Defense Authorization Budget Request from the Department of the Navy," before the U.S. House Committee on the Armed Services. From the statement of James F. Amos, Commandant of the Marine Corps: "The Marine Corps remains first and foremost a naval service, operating in close partnership with the United States Navy. We share with them a storied heritage that predates the signing of our Constitution. Together, the two naval services leverage the seas, not only to protect the vast global commons, but also to project our national power and influence ashore where that is required. The world's coastal regions are the home to an increasing majority of the human population, and are thus the scene of frequent conflict and natural disaster. These 'littoral' regions comprise the connective tissues that connect oceanic trade routes with the activities of populations ashore. In an era of heightened sensitivities over sovereignty, and where large foreign military footprints are unwelcome, the seas provide maritime forces with a means of less obtrusive access. Maritime expeditionary forces can be located close enough to act when crisis threatens and hours matter, without imposing a burden on host nations. Expeditionary maritime forces can operate in the air, at sea, and on land, without the necessity of infrastructure ashore. They can loiter unseen over the horizon, and can move swiftly from one crisis region to another. Importantly, maritime forces also have the ability to rapidly return to the sea when their mission is complete." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: James F. Amos, Jonathan W. Greenert, and Ray Mabus,
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2013-04-16
-
Department of Defense Views on the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission's Recommendations for Military Health Care Reform: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Military Personnel of the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourteenth Congress, First Session, June 11, 2015
This is the June 11, 2015 hearing on "Department of Defense Views on the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission's Recommendations for Military Health Care Reform" held before the Senate Subcommittee on Military Personnel of the Committee on Armed Services. From the statement of Jonathan Woodson: "Thank you for the opportunity to come before you today to specifically remark on the recent recommendations from the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission (MCRMC), as well as to discuss the state of the Military Health System (MHS), and our plans for the future . Our testimony reflects the shared perspective and vision of the entire MHS leadership team that is testifying before you today. The Commission has performed a valuable service to the Department and the nation. The Commission's 18- month independent review reaffirmed many positive changes we are making to help enhance the Services' capability to recruit, train and retain America's All -Volunteer Force in the present and future, while supporting those who have served our Nation. I n addition, it pointed out areas where we can do better. In many cases, we have come to similar conclusions about the challenges facing military medicine with the end of kinetic combat operations. There were many important recommendations with which we concur, and have already moved into implementation . There were other recommendations that contained suggestions that matched actions that were already well under way. The Commission's endorsement of these approaches is both welcome and helpful." Statements, letters and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Mark Ediger, C. Forrest Faison III, Patricia D. Horoho, and Jonathan Woodson.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2015-06-11
-
Hearing to Receive Testimony on U.S. European Command, U.S. Northern Command, and U.S. Southern Command in Review of the Defense Authorization Request for Fiscal Year 2014 and the Future Years Defense Program: Hearing Before the United States Senate Committee on Armed Services, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, First Session, March 19, 2013
This testimony compilation is from the March 19, 2013 hearing, "Hearing to Receive Testimony on U.S. European Command, U.S. Northern Command, and U.S. Southern Command in Review of the Defense Authorization Request for Fiscal Year 2014 and the Future Years Defense Program," before the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services. From the opening statement of Carl Levin: "This morning the committee continues its review of the missions and operational requirements of our combatant commanders in preparation for consideration of the fiscal year 2014 national defense budget request. We welcome Admiral James Stavridis, Commander, U.S. European Command, and Supreme Allied Commander, Europe; General Charles Jacoby, Jr., Commander, U.S. Northern Command, and Commander, North American Aerospace Defense Command, or NORAD; and General John Kelly, Commander, U.S. Southern Command. […] The witnesses before us represent the United States' commitment to defend the homeland, to help our neighbors, and to come to the collective defense of our close allies in Europe. Yet our ability to meet these commitments has been put at risk by the arbitrary budget cuts called sequestration, resulting from the budget impasse here in Washington." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Carl Levin, James G. Stavridis, Charles H. Jacoby, Jr., and John F. Kelly.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2013-03-19
-
United States European Command, Hearing Before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifteenth Congress, First Session, March 23, 2017
This testimony compilation made by the HSDL staff is from the March 23, 2017 hearing, "United States European Command," before the United States Senate Committee on Armed Services. The purpose of this hearing was to discuss the "European theater," which "remains critical to our national interests. The transatlantic alliance gives us an unmatched advantage over our adversaries - a united, capable, warfighting alliance resolved in its purpose and strengthened by shared values that have been forged in battle. EUCOM's [European Command] relationship with NATO and the 51 countries within our Area of Responsibility (AOR) provides the United States with a network of willing partners who support global operations and secure the international rules-based order that our nations have defended together since World War II. Our security architecture protects more than 1 billion people and has safeguarded transatlantic trade, which now constitutes almost half of the world's combined GDP. Nevertheless, today we face the most dynamic European security environment in history." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Curtis M. Scaparrotti.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2017-03-23
-
Hearing to Receive Testimony on U.S. Pacific Command and U.S. Forces Korea in Review of the Defense Authorization Request for Fiscal Year 2014 and the Future Years Defense Program: Hearing Before the United States Senate Committee on Armed Services, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, First Session, April 9, 2013
This testimony compilation is from the April 9, 2013 hearing, "Hearing to Receive Testimony on U.S. Pacific Command and U.S. Forces Korea in Review of the Defense Authorization Request for Fiscal Year 2014 and the Future Years Defense Program," before the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services. From the opening statement of Carl Levin: "We're receiving testimony today on the posture of U.S. forces in the Asia-Pacific region, and on behalf of the committee first let me welcome Admiral Samuel Locklear, the Commander of the U.S. Pacific Command. Admiral, the committee appreciates your long years of faithful service and the many sacrifices that you and your family have made for our Nation, and we would also greatly appreciate it if you would pass along to the men and women with whom you work our admiration for their service as well. […] Today's hearing is a particularly timely one because of the events on the Korean Peninsula, which have intensified as the North Korean regime, which is a longstanding international pariah, has elevated its reckless rhetoric and its provocative behavior. Any guarded optimism about North Korea that may have accompanied the December 2011 death of long-time dictator Kim Jong Il has faded as the new regime has adopted many of the same destructive policies as its predecessors, stubbornly pursuing its nuclear weapons and its ballistic missile programs with callous disregard for the wellbeing of its own people and the region." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Carl Levin and Samuel J. Locklear, III.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2013-04-09
-
All Arms Warfare in the 21st Century, Hearing Before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifteenth Congress, First Session, March 15, 2017
This testimony compilation made by the HSDL staff is from the March 15, 2017 hearing, "All Arms Warfare in the 21st Century," before the United States Senate Committee on Armed Services. The purpose of this hearing was to discuss, "critical issue of the future of all arms warfare in the 21st century. Our air and land forces have an extensive history of operating in conjunction with one another to accomplish military objectives. […] Our military situation today is stark. The United States faces a burgeoning number, and a greater spectrum of threats around the globe. At the same time we have declining resources allocated to meeting these threats. To successfully confront this dynamic array of dangers, we must optimize our military organizations and concepts of operation. We must evolve service relationships from ones of interoperability-a goal of the Goldwater-Nichols Act, to ones of full integration and interdependency. This is the next step in the evolution of our military." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: David A. Deptula, Douglas A. Macgregor, and Paul Scharre.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2017-03-15
-
Russian Strategy and Military Operations, Hearing before the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee, One Hundred Fourteenth Congress, First Session, October 8, 2015
"This testimony compilation is from the October 8, 2015 hearing 'Russian Strategy and Military Operations' before the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee. From the statement of John M. Keane: 'Russia began air strikes in Syria about a week ago after rapidly establishing a forward operating air base at Al Assad airfield in Latakia province, some 36 miles north of their Naval base at Tartous. Establishing an out of region air base, that is isolated from the heartland of Russia, in a war zone, is quite unprecedented, particularly for a non expeditionary military.' Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: John M. Keane, James L. Jones, Heather Conley, and Stephen Sestanovich."
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2015-10-08
-
United States Pacific Command and United States Forces Korea, Hearing Before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifteenth Congress, First Session, April 27, 2017
This testimony compilation made by the HSDL staff is from the April 27, 2017 hearing, "United States Pacific Command and United States Forces Korea," before the United States Senate Committee on Armed Services. From the witness statement, this hearing is, "my assessment of the regional security challenges and opportunities of strategic value. First, I will outline some of the specific challenges we face in the Indo-Asia-Pacific including threats to the Homeland. I will highlight critical needs in order to seek your support for budgetary and legislative actions to improve U.S. military readiness in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region. I will discuss the value of U.S. strategic force posture and forward presence and how these preconditions improve the readiness of our joint force to fight tonight, enhance our ability to reassure allies and partners, and maintain regional stability. And finally, I will discuss how USPACOM [U.S. Pacific Command] strengthens existing alliances and cultivates critical partnerships with regional actors - both of which deliver strategic benefits and improve readiness to protect and defend U.S. interests." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Harry B. Harris Jr.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2017-07-27
-
North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Russia, and European Security, Hearing Before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourteenth Congress, Second Session, July 7, 2016
This hearing compilation is from the July 7, 2016 hearing on "North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Russia, and European Security" before the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services. From the statement of Julianne Smith: "For the general public, it is often hard to see how such a large gathering of world leaders signing communiques with promises of 'transformation' and 'smart defense' will have any real impact on their daily lives. Even NATO experts sometimes find the summits disappointing, especially the countless pledges to increase defense spending that have been met for years with inaction. This year's NATO summit in Warsaw, though, will be an entirely different affair both in substance and style. The Alliance is about to demonstrate that it is anything but obsolete." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: James L. Jones, R. Nicholas Burns, and Julianne Smith."
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2016-07-07
-
Review of the Circumstances Surrounding the Ranger Raid on October 3-4, 1993 in Mogadishu, Somalia
According to this congressional review of the failed Army Ranger mission in Somalia in 1993, "the 'can do' attitude that characterizes Army and other special operations forces may make them attractive to policy makers, but it can also be a cause for concern. One of the weaknesses of a unit like Task Force Ranger, whose combat capabilities are unparalleled, is the belief by the unit members and its commanders that they can accomplish any mission. Because of the supreme confidence of special operations forces, the chain of command must provide more oversight to this type of unit than to conventional forces."
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
1995-09-29
-
Posture of the Department of the Navy, Hearing Before the Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate, One Hundred Fifteenth Congress, First Session, June 15, 2017
This testimony compilation is from the June 15, 2017 hearing, "Posture of the Department of the Navy," before the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services. From the witness testimony of Sean J. Stackley: "As the nation's forward global force, the men and women of your Navy and Marine Corps are fully deployed, continuously present afloat and ashore, promoting and protecting the national interests of the United States. If called, they are prepared to 'fight tonight' and win. But, by operating forward, by maintaining a high state of readiness, by participating in international exercises and providing assurance to our partners and allies, by securing the maritime and ensuring access to the global commons, by performing the full spectrum of missions assigned - from humanitarian assistance to strategic deterrence - our greater objective is to dissuade our adversaries and ultimately, to deter potential conflict. To this end, the Navy and Marine Corps operate as part of the larger Joint Force, uniquely providing the sovereignty and persistence of a sea-based force able to operate wherever the waters reach and able to rapidly maneuver ashore as an expeditionary force with air and ground support. It is this ability to operate independently for sustained periods that places naval forces in such a high demand that Combatant Commanders' peacetime requests for naval forces exceed the capacity of the currently sized force. Careful management of our training, maintenance and deployment cycles, however, has ensured our presence and our readiness to meet the nation's highest priority demands as directed by the Secretary of Defense." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Sean J. Stackley, John M. Richardson, and Robert B. Neller.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2017
-
U.S. Pacific Command and U.S. Forces Korea: Hearing Before U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, Second Session, March 25, 2014
This is a compilation of the March 25, 2014 hearing on "U.S. Pacific Command and U.S. Forces Korea" held before the Senate Committee on Armed Services. Testimonies in this hearing provide an update on the operations of the U.S. Pacific Command (USPACOM) and an update on the continued military presence of U.S. forces in Korea. Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Samuel J. Locklear III and Curtis M. Scaparrotti.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2014-03-25
-
Department of Defense Budget Posture, Hearing Before the Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate, One Hundred Fifteenth Congress, First Session, June 13, 2017
This testimony compilation is from the June 13, 2017 hearing, "Department of Defense Budget Posture," before the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services. From the witness testimony of Joseph F. Dunford Jr.: "The U.S. military's competitive advantage against potential adversaries is eroding. Over the last decade, sustained operational commitments, budgetary instability, and advances by our adversaries have threatened our ability to project power and we have lost our advantage in key warfighting areas. The FY18 Budget Request will allow the Armed Forces to meet operational requirements, continue rebuilding warfighting readiness, and place the military on a path to balancing the Defense program. However, without sustained, sufficient, and predictable funding, I assess that within 5 years we will lose our ability to project power; the basis of how we defend the homeland, advance U.S. interests, and meet our alliance commitments." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: James N. Mattis and Joseph F. Dunford, Jr.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2017
-
Army Modernization: Hearing Before the United States Senate Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Airland, One Hundred Fourteenth Congress, First Session, April 14, 2015
This testimony compilation is from the April 14, 2015 hearing, "Army Modernization," before the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Airland. From the opening statement of Tom Cotton, "The Airland Subcommittee convenes today to hear testimony regarding Army modernization in review of the defense authorization request for fiscal year 2016 and the future years defense program. On behalf of Senator Manchin and myself, I welcome all the witnesses from the U.S. Army and thank each of you for your years of dedicated service oftentimes overseas in hostile environments. The full committee in numerous hearings to date has heard from many witnesses testifying to the many challenges and threats our country and armed services face today. The U.S. is facing the most diverse, complex, and dangerous threats to our national security in recent memory. However, instead of strengthening our forces and ensuring our men and women in uniform have the training, equipment, and logistical support they need, sustained defense budget cuts, in combination with senseless sequestration, are damaging our military's force structure, modernization, and readiness." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Michael E. Williamson, Herbert R. McMaster, Jr., Anthony R. Ierardi, and Gary H. Cheek.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
2015-04-14
