Advanced search Help
Searching for terms: EXACT: "Shanton, Karen L." in: author
Clear all search criteria
Only 2/3! You are seeing results from the Public Collection, not the complete Full Collection. Sign in to search everything (see eligibility).
-
Election Security: States' Spending of FY2018 HAVA Payments [November 12, 2019]
From the Document: "State and local systems have been targeted as part of efforts to interfere with U.S. elections, according to the U.S. Intelligence Community. Congress has responded to such threats, in part, with funding. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (P.L. 115-141) included $380 million for payments to the 50 states, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands (referred to herein as 'states') under the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA; 52 U.S.C. §§20901-21145). This In Focus provides an overview of states' spending of the FY2018 HAVA payments. It starts by summarizing how states have proposed and reported using the funds and then introduces some issues related to the timing of state spending and reporting."
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Shanton, Karen L.
2019-11-12
-
State and Local Role in Election Administration: Duties and Structures [March 4, 2019]
From the Document: "The administration of elections in the United States is highly decentralized. Elections are primarily administered by thousands of state and local systems rather than a single, unified national system. States and localities share responsibility for most election administration duties. Exactly how responsibilities are assigned at the state and local levels varies both between and within states, but there are some general patterns in the distribution of duties. States typically have primary responsibility for making decisions about the rules of elections (policymaking). Localities typically have primary responsibility for conducting elections in accordance with those rules (implementation). Localities, with varying contributions from states, typically also have primary responsibility for paying for the activities and resources required to conduct elections (funding)."
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Shanton, Karen L.
2019-03-04
-
U.S. Election Assistance Commission: Overview and Selected Issues for Congress [June 14, 2019]
From the Document: "The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) is an independent federal agency charged with helping improve the administration of federal elections. It was established by the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA; P.L. 107-252; 116 Stat. 1666; 52 U.S.C. §§20901-21145) and includes a four-member commission, a professional staff, an inspector general, and three advisory bodies."
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Shanton, Karen L.
2019-06-14
-
U.S. Election Assistance Commission: An Overview [June 14, 2019]
From the Document: "The 2000 presidential election exposed weaknesses in state election systems. Congress responded with the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA; P.L. 107-252). Among other changes, such as setting certain national requirements for election administration, HAVA created a federal agency to help states, territories, and localities administer federal elections: the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC). Proposals have since been introduced both to terminate the EAC and to extend or expand it. Most recently, the agency has taken on new roles as part of the federal response to attempted foreign interference in the 2016 elections."
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Shanton, Karen L.
2019-06-14
-
Election Administration and Voting Survey: Overview and 2018 Findings [July 9, 2019]
From the Document: "The Election Administration and Voting Survey (EAVS) is a biennial survey of state and local officials about the administration of federal elections. The survey is conducted for each regular federal election cycle by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC), which reports its findings to Congress and the public the year after the election. [...] This In Focus provides an introduction to the EAVS. It starts with an overview of the survey and then describes topline findings of the 2018 EAVS, some caveats about EAVS data, and legislative activity related to the EAVS."
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Shanton, Karen L.
2019-07-09
-
U.S. Election Assistance Commission: An Overview [Updated February 11, 2019]
"The 2000 presidential election exposed weaknesses in state election systems. Congress responded with the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA; P.L. 107-252). Among other changes, such as setting certain national requirements for election administration, HAVA created a federal agency to help states, territories, and localities administer federal elections: the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC). Proposals have since been introduced both to terminate the EAC and to extend or expand it. Most recently, the agency has taken on new roles as part of the federal response to attempted foreign interference in the 2016 elections."
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Shanton, Karen L.
2019-02-11
-
Election Security: Federal Funding for Securing Election Systems [August 8, 2019]
From the Document: "Russia targeted state and local systems as part of its effort to interfere with the 2016 elections, according to the U.S. Intelligence Community. Reports of Russia's activities highlighted the potential for threats to the technologies, facilities, and processes used to administer elections. Congress has responded to such threats, in part, by providing and proposing funding to help secure elections. This In Focus offers an overview of federal funding for securing election systems. It starts with some background on potential threats to state and local election systems and then summarizes the funding Congress has provided and proposed to help secure those systems."
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Shanton, Karen L.
2019-08-08
-
Early Voting and Mail Voting: Overview & Issues for Congress [March 27, 2020]
From the Document: "Although voting in person at a polling place on Election Day is the most common voting practice, states and localities also offer some or all of their voters opportunities to vote without going to the polls on Election Day. Sending voters ballots by mail ('mail voting') and designating a pre-Election Day period when voters can receive and cast a ballot in person ('early voting') are two of the most common options. Some states and localities use mail voting as their primary voting method, automatically mailing ballots to all registered voters and offering limited in-person voting options ('all-mail elections')."
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Eckman, Sarah J.; Shanton, Karen L.
2020-03-27
-
Election Security: States' Spending of FY2018 HAVA Payments [Updated March 12, 2020]
From the Document: "State and local systems have been targeted as part of efforts to interfere with U.S. elections, according to the U.S. intelligence community. Congress has responded to such threats, in part, with funding. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (P.L. 115-141) included $380 million for payments to the 50 states, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands (referred to hereinafter as 'states') under the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA; 52 U.S.C. §§20901-21145), and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (P.L. 116-93) provided $425 million for payments to those jurisdictions and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. This In Focus provides an overview of states' spending of the FY2018 HAVA payments. It starts by summarizing how states have proposed and reported using the funds and then introduces some issues related to the timing of state spending and reporting."
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Shanton, Karen L.
2020-03-12
-
Election Security: Federal Funding for Securing Election Systems [Updated March 12, 2020]
From the Document: "Russia targeted state and local systems as part of its effort to interfere with the 2016 elections, according to the U.S. intelligence community. Reports of Russia's activities highlighted the potential for threats to the technologies, facilities, and processes used to administer elections. Congress has responded to such threats, in part, by providing and proposing funding to help secure elections. This In Focus offers an overview of federal funding for securing election systems. It starts with some background on potential threats to state and local election systems and then summarizes the funding Congress has provided and proposed to help secure those systems."
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Shanton, Karen L.
2020-03-12
-
Campaign and Election Security Policy: Overview and Recent Developments for Congress [January 2, 2020]
From the Document: "In the United States, state, territorial, and local governments are responsible for most aspects of selecting and securing election systems and equipment. Foreign interference during the 2016 election cycle--and widely reported to be an ongoing threat--has renewed congressional attention to campaign and election security and raised new questions about the nature and extent of the federal government's role in this policy area. This report provides congressional readers with a resource for understanding campaign and election security policy. This includes discussion of the federal government's roles; state or territorial responsibilities for election administration and election security; an overview of potentially relevant federal statutes and agencies; and highlights of recent congressional policy debates. The report summarizes related legislation that has advanced beyond introduction during the 116th Congress. It also poses questions for consideration as the House and Senate examine whether or how to pursue legislation, oversight, or appropriations."
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Garrett, R. Sam, 1977-; Eckman, Sarah J.; Shanton, Karen L.
2020-01-02
-
Election Infrastructure Subsector: Development and Challenges [March 5, 2020]
From the Document: "In January 2017, in accordance with Presidential Policy Directive 21 (PPD-21), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) designated the systems and assets used in elections as the Election Infrastructure Subsector (EIS) of the Government Facilities critical infrastructure sector. DHS defines critical infrastructure as 'the physical and cyber systems and assets that are so vital to the United States that their incapacity or destruction would have a debilitating impact on our physical or economic security or public health or safety.' The critical infrastructure designation was intended to help address some of the obstacles election stakeholders faced in responding to foreign interference in the 2016 elections, such as a lack of timely information sharing about threats to election systems. It gave DHS a new role in election security, authorizing it to help coordinate among and prioritize assistance to election security stakeholders. This In Focus provides an overview of the EIS. It describes the formation and development of the subsector and some of the ongoing challenges it faces."
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Humphreys, Brian E.; Shanton, Karen L.
2020-02-05
-
Mail Voting and COVID-19: Developments and Potential Challenges [April 23, 2020]
From the Document: "Most voters reported voting in person in 2018, but the onset of the COVID-19 [coronavirus disease 2019] pandemic has complicated in-person voting for certain subsequent elections in 2020. Health risks associated with close contact have prompted concerns about some of the standard interactions involved in preparing for and conducting in-person voting. States have taken various steps to address such concerns for some of their 2020 elections, including postponing election dates, offering curbside voting, and relocating polling places. One common response has been to expand 'mail voting', in which voters receive ballots by mail rather than in person. Expanding mail voting could help address health risks but may come with its own challenges. Whether or how mail voting should be expanded and what role, if any, Congress should play in this policy area have been subjects of debate in the 116th Congress."
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Shanton, Karen L.; Eckman, Sarah J.
2020-04-23
-
Election Security: States' Spending of FY2018 and FY2020 HAVA Payments [Updated June 30, 2020]
From the Document: "State and local systems have been targeted as part of efforts to interfere with U.S. elections, and Congress has responded in part with funding. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (P.L. 115-141) provided $380 million for payments to the 50 states, the District of Columbia (DC), American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands authorized under the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA; 52 U.S.C. §§20901-21145), and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (P.L. 116-93) included $425 million for HAVA payments to those jurisdictions and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. This In Focus offers an overview of spending of the FY2018 and FY2020 HAVA payments to date."
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Shanton, Karen L.
2020-06-30
-
Elections Grant Funding for States: Recent Appropriations and Legislative Proposals [September 18, 2020]
From the Document: "The emergence of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and reports of attempted election interference have introduced new challenges for election administration that are ongoing, difficult for states and localities to manage alone, or both. Election security threats evolve, for example, and election officials' defenses have to evolve with them. Securing election systems against potential interference and protecting voters and election workers against a pandemic may involve significant changes to election processes and correspondingly significant financial investments. Congress has responded to such challenges, in part, with funding for elections grant programs. As of this writing, Congress has appropriated more than $1.2 billion to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) for grant funding for states, territories, and the District of Columbia (DC) since FY2018 and considered proposals that would authorize or fund further grant programs."
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Shanton, Karen L.
2020-09-18
-
COVID-19 and Other Election Emergencies: Frequently Asked Questions and Recent Policy Developments [July 16, 2020]
From the Summary: "This report addresses frequently asked questions and policy developments surrounding 'election emergencies'. For the purposes of this report, election emergencies are defined as unexpected, rapidly developing, external events that could substantially interrupt normal voting, election administration, or campaigning. Examples include sustained natural disasters, major disease outbreaks, or certain attacks on election systems. There appears to be no modern precedent for a nationwide emergency in the United States, such as COVID-19 [coronavirus disease 2019], affecting elections and voting. Election administrators do, however, routinely prepare for various contingencies. Prominent examples of recent election emergencies in the states include the 2001 terrorist attacks; Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005-2006; and an H1N1 (swine flu) pandemic in 2009. Effects from each episode varied substantially."
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Garrett, R. Sam, 1977-; Eckman, Sarah J.; Shanton, Karen L.
2020-07-16
-
Federal Election Results: Frequently Asked Questions [October 8, 2020]
From the Summary: "Several states have implemented new election administration processes in response to the COVID-19 [coronavirus disease 2019] pandemic that could affect how and when ballots are counted. Even under normal circumstances, finalizing federal election results takes days or weeks after election day. Among other steps, state, territorial, and local election officials 'canvass' votes to ensure that ballots are valid and counted accurately. Election observers, audits, and other processes are designed to enhance transparency. This report addresses frequently asked questions on these and related subjects. The discussion emphasizes the period between the time a voter casts a ballot and when election officials 'certify', or finalize, the results."
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Eckman, Sarah J.; Garrett, R. Sam, 1977-; Shanton, Karen L.
2020-10-08
1
