Advanced search Help
Searching for terms: EXACT: "Deitz, Paul" in: author
Clear all search criteria
Only 2/3! You are seeing results from the Public Collection, not the complete Full Collection. Sign in to search everything (see eligibility).
-
Communicating Warfighting Requirements to Systems Engineers, Part I
A Presentation made at the World Wide Chemical Conference XIX from the U.S. Army Defense Modeling and Simulation Office about the most efficient means of communicating warfighting information to system engineers. Includes requirements definitions, conceptual model development, design development, integration and testing, and execution and results analysis.
United States. Defense Modeling and Simulation Office
Dougherty, Fran; Wong, Alex; Haddix, Furman . . .
2002-02-25
-
Communicating Warfighting Requirements to Systems Engineers, Part II
A Presentation made at the World Wide Chemical Conference XIX from the U.S. Army Defense Modeling and Simulation Office about the most efficient means of communicating warfighting information to system engineers. Includes requirements definitions, conceptual model development, design development, integration and testing, and execution and results analysis.
United States. Defense Modeling and Simulation Office
Dougherty, Fran; Wong, Alex; Haddix, Furman . . .
2002-02-25
-
Nexus of Military Missions and Means
"In support of Defense Transformation, it has become vital that military planners, operators, and analysts not merely concentrate on 'doing things right' but also focus on 'doing the right things.' The Cold War era 'right thing' of winning the heavy-armor battles in Europe has given way to multiple and diverse 'right things' of unconventional warfare, homeland defense, peacekeeping operations, etc. To address these complex objectives, what is needed is a robust means to rigorously specify operational purposes and goals, then explicitly relate, map, and allocate them to the proposed means for accomplishment. Accordingly, this report describes a framework for representing the synthesis of military operations and the employment of materiel/forces to accomplish missions. It also formalizes the mission space, details how framework components need to be linked and instantiated, and discusses ways in which this approach is being exercised."
U.S. Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity
Sheehan, Jack; Deitz, Paul; Harris, Bruce
2004-06
-
Military Missions and Means Framework
"As the Department of Defense (DoD) transforms itself from a forces-based, materiel-centric Cold War posture to a capabilities-based, mission-centric asymmetric-warfare posture, it is increasingly vital that military planners, operators, and analysts concern themselves not only with "doing things right" (i.e., the technical architecture) but also with "doing the right things" (i.e., the operational architecture). Moreover, the historic "right thing" of winning the large-scale conventional engagements in Europe has given way to multiple and diverse "right things" of unconventional combat, homeland defense, peacekeeping missions, and various kinds of military operations other than war (MOOTW). To address these complex new objectives, a framework is needed to comprehensively organize and rigorously specify operational purposes and goals and then explicitly relate, map, and allocate them to the proposed technical means for accomplishment. This paper describes the fundamental elements and usage of the military Missions and Means Framework (MMF), which is increasingly being used to represent the synthesis of military operations and the employment of materiel/forces to accomplish these operations."
U.S. Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity
Sheehan, Jack; Deitz, Paul; Bray, Britt E.
2004-10
1
