Advanced search Help
Searching for terms: EXACT: "Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership" in: publisher
Clear all search criteria
Only 2/3! You are seeing results from the Public Collection, not the complete Full Collection. Sign in to search everything (see eligibility).
-
Role of the Military in Protecting the World's Water Resources
This is the report of a workshop held to explore the issue of use and impact on the world's water resources by the world's militaries. The workshop explored how militaries can accomplish their mission while lessening their impact on the environmental quality of water resources and the use of regular operations in risk management.
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Smith, Brian D. (Brian Douglas), 1959-; Bradshaw, Arthur L., Jr.; Butts, Kent Hughes
2000-07
-
Wargaming Homeland Security to Meet the Challenges Confronting 21st Century America
After the traumatic events of September 11, the U.S. Army War College aggressively sought to engage in the national challenges
born of the tragedy-specifically Homeland Security-in hopes of ensuring our students understanding of the challenges and help in contributing to a solution. The War College sought to accomplish this by replicating as close to known reality the emerging Homeland Security environment and playing it in the capstone student wargaming event, the Strategic Crisis Exercise SCE).
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Pasquarett, Michael
2002-05
-
Examining Transformation of the Army Reserve and Army National Guard for the 21st Century
On September 23-26, the Center for Strategic Leadership (CSL) hosted a workshop with 85 senior Active Component (AC) and Reserve Component (RC) leaders in order to develop an improved understanding of Army National Guard (ARNG) and Army Reserve (AR) in the emergent national security environment so as to better portray them in U.S. Army War College and other Army activities and exercises.
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Kievit, James; Taylor, John; Murray, Thomas
2002-11
-
Business and Security in a Wired World
Strategic Leadership (CSL) conducted a "Business Security in a Wired World" seminar in Rye, New York on 24-25 April 2002. Participants in the event included business executives representing critical infrastructure segments, government participants, and executives of two industry associations. The College's objective in the session was to obtain a better understanding of private sector concerns for information assurance and homeland security. Following the panels, CSL facilitators led a "crisis exercise" which examined key aspects of policy implementation, information sharing, stakeholder expectations, incident response and recovery, and organizational culture.
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Murphy, Dennis M.
2002-07
-
Defending The Defender - Keeping the Shield Strong (November 26-28, 2001)
Over thirty-five subject matter experts from both the federal government and the private sector participated in the three-day workshop conducted at the U.S. Army War College's Collins Center from 26-28 November 2001. The purpose of the workshop was to explore issues regarding the security of our present and future space and missile defense systems, especially from asymmetric threats. Workshop participants examined the vulnerabilities of the National Missile Defense (NMD) and Theater Missile Defense (TMD) portions of the Integrated Missile Defense (IMD) system based on projected operational concepts briefed during the workshop.
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Pasquarett, Michael; Carney, Patrick; Cohen, Peter . . .
2001-12
-
Streamlining National Security Workshop: The Homeland Group (September 5-7, 2001)
This paper presents the preliminary findings and identifies some critical issues raised by The Homeland Group during the Workshop on Streamlining National Security 5 to 7 September 2001. Sixty subject matter experts gathered to discuss and explore concepts for restructuring certain areas within existing national security organizations.
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Menk, Peter D.; Tussing, Bert B.
2001-10
-
Conventional Deterrence in the First Quarter of the New Century - A Strategic Workshop (February 20-22, 2001)
The purpose of the Workshop was to answer broad questions of how U.S. national power should be postured to remain an effective deterrent force in support of U.S. national security objectives in the 21st Century. The participants considered the future challenges of an evolving geostrategic environment, U.S. national interests, alternative options and ways to employ the
elements of national power
(political-military-diplomatic-information-economic) and identified critical means (capabilities) needed for effective deterrence.
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Menk, Peter D.
2001-02
-
Responding to Terror: A Report of the U.S. Army War College Consequence Management Symposium
The Consequence Management Symposium was conducted by the Center for Strategic Leadership (CSL), at
the Collins Center, United States Army War College. It was co-sponsored by the Center for
Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). The purpose of the conference was to contribute to the ongoing debate over domestic defense, and to identify opportunities and approaches to solutions in this area of vital national interest.
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
2002-05
-
Talking the Talk: Why Warfighters Don't Understand Information Operations
"The value of information as a military enabler has always been a factor in warfare. But the rapid evolution of the information environment has caused information to rise in importance to where it is effectively used by adversaries as an asymmetric weapon of choice. The improvised explosive device may be a tactical kinetic weapon, but it is, more importantly, a strategic information weapon when the detonator is paired with a videographer. In an attempt to both counter this information-savvy enemy, as well as exploit that same environment to achieve military objectives, the United States military has struggled to establish definitions and doctrine concurrent with applying those nascent concepts in combat. The result is a developmental process that has muddied the waters outside the very narrow subset of military service members and academicians who claim some form of 'information' as their primary specialty; ironic, given the communications and marketing expertise espoused by some of those very same practitioners. A review of current military and U.S. government information-related lexicon and definitions points out a very obvious flaw: this stuff is confusing…and in some cases, self-defeating. It's time for a doctrinal pause to allow a clean slate review of information operations, strategic communication and, yes, cyberspace operations. Such a review may find that simpler is better."
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Murphy, Dennis M.
2009-05
-
Setting the Scene for a Discussion of DoD's Role in Responding to Catastrophe
This report is part of chapter one of five chapters in the series: Threats at Our Threshold: Homeland Defense and Homeland Security in the New Century: A Compilation of the Proceedings of the First Annual Homeland Defense and Homeland Security Conference. The following is taken from the introduction of the report: "The intellectual development of homeland security is beginning to move outside the beltway and Washington D.C., past the issue of training firemen and other first responders, and into the realm of academia. We are finally beginning to engage the intelligencia of the United States, within the university system. This is going to change the nature of the debate, because these experts in research and teaching have things to say that you might not want to hear about what constitutes homeland security, and what we should or should not be doing. This leads to a second point. I want to suggest to you a narrative -- how to think about homeland security. I am certainly moved by 9/11. Many of my students are moved by 9/11. But my faculty, by and large, is not. It does not do me any good to begin with a slide that talks about 9/11. I have quit talking about the global war on terrorism. Many people in the Unites States are not moved by that argument. In fact, there is a certain counter or backfire building against this argument as to why we are at war and isn't it in fact our own fault. So, I use a different narrative to explain our situation. I offer it to every audience because I think it is important that we have a common understanding of what we are doing and why. My first point is that the current problems of homeland security have nothing to do with whether or not there are Arab fundamentalist here and whether or not we are facing Islamic radicalism. It has everything to do with the maturity of technology so that small people now have access to big weapons."
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Tussing, Bert B.; McIntyre, David H.
-
Finding the Enemy Within: Towards a Framework for Domestic Intelligence
This report is chapter four of five chapters in the series: Threats at Our Threshold: Homeland Defense and Homeland Security in the New Century: A Compilation of the Proceedings of the First Annual Homeland Defense and Homeland Security Conference. The following is taken from the introduction of the report: "Of all the issues that we have wrestled with since 9/11, perhaps none has received more consideration or attention in discussions on homeland security than the acknowledged shortcomings of intelligence--in collection, analysis, and sharing--prior to the September 2001 attacks. In the United States, intelligence collection is split between agencies that look outside of our borders (e.g., the military, the Central Intelligence Agency [CIA]) and those that look inward (the Federal Bureau of Investigation [FBI]). And while there has been significant attention paid to the reorganization, revitalization and resourcing of our foreign intelligence services, far less attention has been paid to the domestic side of the equation. There is, however, a clear new need and many new activities emerging to bolster intelligence capabilities to support post-9/11 homeland security/defense missions. And yet the increase in domestic intelligence (DI) collection has moved forward with little public discussion, no apparent framework, and little oversight. This raises the prospect of an emerging domestic intelligence 'system' where all the pieces don't fit together, pieces are missing or redundant, and there is no framework for protecting individual liberties. To address DI responsibly requires answering fundamental questions about what agencies should be responsible for collecting intelligence within the United States; what types of domestic information the government should collect, and how it should be used; and how the government needs to coordinate and oversee the process to assure effectiveness and protection of civil liberties."
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Heyman, David
-
DoD and the Problem of Mega-Catastrophes
This report is part of chapter one of five chapters in the series: Threats at Our Threshold: Homeland Defense and Homeland Security in the New Century: A Compilation of the Proceedings of the First Annual Homeland Defense and Homeland Security Conference. The following is taken from the introduction of the report: "The organizers of this conference made a strange choice in selecting me to advance the argument that the Department of Defense (DoD) ought to take the lead role in responding to catastrophes. For the overwhelming majority of incidents that may confront the U.S. response system in the future, I believe that the current, civilian-led system is structurally sound (and in many respects, ideal). The same civilian-led system also provides the best framework for building the sort of response system necessary for what I will call 'normal catastrophes' --that is, catastrophes on the scale of Hurricane Katrina. But the United States should plan for the unlikely possibility that a catastrophe of a vastly larger scale may strike. In such a 'mega-catastrophe,' DoD will face unwanted but ineluctable pressures to temporarily assume the lead of U.S. response operations. That is not a particularly desirable thing. Still worse, however, is the prospect that DoD would take the lead without having planned for the challenges it will confront, including the imperative to return leadership responsibilities to civilian officials as rapidly and effectively as possible. My argument is built around a typology of very bad events, ordered in terms of their destructiveness: 1) major disasters (as defined in the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act); 2) normal catastrophes (as defined by the National Response Plan and its Catastrophic Incident Annex); and 3) mega-catastrophes, which differ qualitatively from normal catastrophes in ways that will require a different architecture for the response system, and a different role for DoD."
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Stockton, Paul
-
International Environmental Security: The Regional Dimension
This executive seminar furthered the international community's understanding of environmental security, promote the Department of State's Environmental Hub concept, and to provide federal agencies and CINCs with regional perspectives on how the United States could use the environment to promote regional security.
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Bradshaw, Arthur L., Jr.
1998
-
Planning Considerations for International Involvement in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict [Part II]
Professor Jarat Chopra, Brown University, and Professor Jim McCallum, U.S. Army Peacekeeping Institute, with an Israeli author, Gidi Grinstein, and a Palestinian author, Amjad Atallah, wrote Planning Considerations for International Involvement in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict as a result of a meeting they attended in the Netherlands 5-7 January 2003. At that meeting a group of Palestinians, Israelis and international officials convened for the first time to address the operational aspects of third party intervention in the current conflict. The following report is a reflection of the issues discussed, and incorporates many of the ideas contributed by the participants.
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Atallah, Amjad
2003-05
-
Planning Considerations for International Involvement in Post-Taliban Afghanistan
On November 14, 2001 - the day after the fall of Kabul - the US Army Peacekeeping Institute, Carlisle, PA, in collaboration with the Thomas J. Watson Jr. Institute for International Studies at Brown University, hosted an informal meeting on Afghanistan. The purpose of the meeting was to explore a range of options and issues affecting the design of international intervention in Afghanistan. The following report is a reflection of the issues discussed, and incorporates many of the ideas contributed by meeting participants.
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Thierer, Adam D.; Chopra, Jarat; McCallum, Jim
2001-11
-
Planning Considerations for International Involvement in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict [Part I]
Professor Jarat Chopra, Brown University, and Professor Jim McCallum, U.S. Army Peacekeeping Institute, and two Israeli authors, Orit Gal and Professor Joel Peters, and two Palestinian authors, Amjad Atallah and Yaser Dajani, wrote Planning Considerations for International Involvement in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict -- Part II, as a result of a meeting they attended at the University of Cambridge Centre of International Studies, UK 25-26 April 2003. At that meeting a group of Palestinians, Israelis and international officials convened for the second time. This second report outlines the latest regional and ground developments in the wake of war in Iraq; identifies further requirements of intervention as required by the parties and the realities of the current situation; considers the current monitoring approach in the "Roadmap"; and assesses the degrees of international commitment available generally for third party involvement.
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Chopra, Jarat
2003-02
-
Reporters on the Ground: The Military and the Media's Experience During Operation Iraqi Freedom
During the planning for Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) the Department of Defense (DoD) developed an embedded media program that planned for large numbers of embedded reporters throughout military units. Unlike Vietnam in the 1970s, this program resulted in television reporting from within Iraq, especially from those reporters embedded with front lines units, almost instantaneously. The speed that these reports made it on the air often outpaced the military's communication channels. Although it gave the American citizens an immediate close up report of what their armed forces were doing, it handicapped media analysts and stateside reporters in their ability to put the raw reporting from the field into a larger context. Conversely those TV journalists supplying these spectacular reports and engrossing pictures from the front line were also handicapped in that they were reporting in a vacuum, unable themselves to obtain any kind of perspective or context.
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Pasquarett, Michael
2003-10
-
Preliminary Report on the NATO/CCMS Environmental Security Conference
This study elaborates conclusions and recommendations to enhance environmental aspects in security deliberations, and to include security considerations in national and international environmental policies and instruments. It also analyzes the relationship between environmental change and security.
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Butts, Kent Hughes
1997-09
-
Landpower and Dual Containment: Rethinking America's Policy in the Gulf
The author of this study contends that America's Dual Containment policy has failed. He outlines in what way he thinks that it has, and suggests alternative polices, which he believes might prove successful, and which would not destablize the Gulf--the risk that (in the author's view) we are now running. By a combination of economic sanctions and more forcible methods, America has sought, through Dual Containment, to make Iran and Iraq amend behavior that the United States believes it cannot tolerate. In the case of Iraq, America finds actions of the leadership so abhorent that nothing less than a complete regime change is demanded. The United States wants Iran to give up its alleged support for terrorism.
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Pelletiere, Stephen C.
1999-11
-
Streamlining National Security Workshop: The Overseas Group (September 5-7, 2001)
This paper presents the preliminary findings and identifies some critical issues raised by The Overseas Working Group during the Workshop on Streamlining National Security 5 to 7 September 2001. Sixty subject matter experts gathered to discuss and explore concepts for restructuring certain areas within existing national security organizations. Over the past decade, even as the international security environment under went significant change, U.S. national security organizations remained relatively unchanged. After his election, President Bush directed his national security team to undertake a sweeping review of future strategies and their supporting structures. That still on-going review is intended to identify what changes may be required to ensure that the numerous and varied organizations, structures, and processes associated with the creation and execution of U.S. national security policies and procedures are effective, efficient, and affordable.
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Pasquarett, Michael; Kievit, James; Carney, Patrick
2001-10
-
U.S. Army's Initial Impressions of Operations Enduring Freedom and Noble Eagle
During a 26-29 August 2002 conference conducted at the Collins Center for Strategic Leadership of the United States Army War College, a group of 51 representatives, from throughout The Army gathered to examine initial impressions from Operations Enduring Freedom and Noble Eagle (OEF/NE). The intent of the conference was to develop and publish an unclassified conference report, provide an opportunity to cross fertilize ideas across The Army, and to develop recommendations to facilitate collection, analysis, and dissemination of Army strategic and operational Global War on Terrorism lessons learned over the long term.
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Crane, Conrad C.; Thompson, Eugene L.
2002-10
-
In the Dark: Military Planning for a Catastrophic Critical Infrastructure Event: A Workshop to Explore the Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Preparedness with Respect to an Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack or a Solar Storm
"This workshop addressed the preparation, response, and recovery from a catastrophic event. An event may be considered catastrophic when the number of people affected is greater than that normally covered by a typical federal response area and the time to recover was well beyond that of a localized disaster. Also, catastrophic events involve almost complete disruption of communications and other critical infrastructure (such as the electrical power grid). A spectrum chart (Figure 1) helps to illustrate the factors and scope of emergency events that may require the response of organizations at the local, state, and federal levels. The vertical axis of the diagram represents the number of people affected and the horizontal axis represents the time to recover from a given event. Some examples are weather events (such as floods and hurricanes); geological events (such as earthquakes or tsunamis); and biological events (such as an influenza outbreak). This report contains four main sections and two annexes. Section 1, Workshop Overview and Objectives; Section 2, Plenary Session Presentation Discussions; Section 3, Break-out Session Findings; and Section 4, Workshop Conclusions and Recommendations. Annex A contains selected questions and answers from the plenary session, and Annex B a list of workshop attendees."
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Cogan, Kevin
2011-04
-
Reexamining the Role of the Guard and Reserves in Support to Civilian Authorities: Assessing the Evolving Relationship of the National Guard Bureau with Other Department of Defense Organizations in Responding to Crises
"With the publication of its new charter, the NGB [National Guard Bureau] has been empowered with greater access, greater representation, and greater responsibility. Commensurate with all three, however, is a clear necessity for greater coordination between the Bureau and the states' National Guard, in order to provide for a rapid, integrated response in times of crises. For large-scale domestic incidents, the NGB's integrated planning with and through the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, and USNORTHCOM [United States Northern Command] should help in providing a streamlined integration of federal assets when and where they are needed most. Planning should take place far ahead of the requirement, followed by comprehensive programming and budgeting to ensure an effective integration of capabilities between all stakeholders. Finally, the Bureau, as a component of the military's support to civilian authorities, must work to exercise these concepts, to ensure that the envisioned ways and means designed to meet domestic response requirements are, indeed, sufficient to the task."
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Forster, Scott; Tussing, Bert B.
2008-07
-
Bullets and Blogs: New Media and the Warfighter
"For the U.S. military, new media and the Global Information Environment (GIE) present sustained challenges and opportunities. In recent years, new adversaries -- armed with new media capabilities and an information-led warfighting strategy -- have proven themselves capable of stopping the most powerful militaries in the world. The current and future geo-strategic environment requires preparation for a battlespace in which symbolic informational wins may precipitate strategic effects equivalent to, or greater than, lethal operations. It demands a paradigm shift away from an emphasis on information control and towards information engagement. It will require cultural and organizational change within the Department of Defense (DOD) as it adapts to the world of digital natives -- its own savvy Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines and their communicative expectations, proclivities, potential and risk; as well as its current and over-the-horizon opponents. Most of all, it will force the sustained adaptation and transformation of the way the U.S. military thinks and fights."
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Rohozinski, Rafal; Collings, Deirdre, 1962-
2008-09
-
Fourth Anton Myrer Strategic Leadership Conference: A 'Leadership During Crisis' Workshop
Over twenty experienced senior business, civilian government, military, and academic leaders met for three days in mid-June at the U.S. Army War College's Collins Center to examine how leaders respond to various crises in their organizations. The specific objectives of the workshop, the 4th annual leadership symposium sponsored by the Army War College Foundation in honor of Anton Myrer's superb novel on military leadership, "Once An Eagle", included: Similarities and differences in how strategic leaders prepare for and respond to crises in each type of organization, What the leaders of each type of institution might learn from each other regarding leadership during crises, and how better to educate strategic leaders.
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
Kievit, James; Crutcher, Michael H.; Sweeney, Tom . . .
2002-07
-
Futures Seminar: The United States Army in 2025 and Beyond (A Compendium of U.S. Army War College Student Papers), Volume Two
From the Foreword: "The Academic Year 2015 (AY15) Futures Seminar was asked by the Army Capabilities Integration Center (ARCIC) to assume an expanded role to help the Army examine the Future Force and understand how the Army will operate over the coming decades. 23 Army War College students stepped forward to enroll in the 8 credit elective and form a diverse and tremendously experienced group from across the joint force and interagency. Active and Reserve Component; military and civilian; capabilities development veterans and novices; the Seminar enjoyed a richness in experience and perspective that was powerful and necessary. Group-think was not a problem. [...] This compendium represents 23 students' peek into the Army of 2025+. Some ideas and recommendations are specific and affect narrow slices of the Army; others are broad and span multiple services or components. Some are tactical; others strategic. Some very aspirational; others very practical. Regardless, they are the thoughts of strategic thinkers who have embraced their responsibility to help posture the enterprise for the future by thinking and writing about tough issues. The enterprise is better for their effort."
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
White, Samuel R., Jr.
2015
-
Futures Seminar: The United States Army in 2030 and Beyond (A Compendium of U.S. Army War College Student Papers), Volume Three
From the Foreword: "In 1994 the Army embarked on the Army After Next (AAN) study plan to explore new concepts and think innovatively about how the Army would fight in the future. [...] Fast forward 20 years to 2014. This was the first year of the Army War College's Futures Seminar - a seminar loosely modeled on the AAN Seminar. As with the AAN seminar, Future Seminar students and faculty collaborate to explore the Army of the Future…in this case, the Army of 2035 and beyond. As with previous years, the seminar focused on the requirements for an Army of the future - and sought to explore the question: 'What kind of Army does the nation need in 2035 and beyond?' This 3rd annual compendium is one output of their thoughts."
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
White, Samuel R., Jr.
2016
-
Futures Seminar: The United States Army in 2025 and Beyond (A Compendium of U.S. Army War College Student Papers), Volume One
From the Foreword: "Academic Year 2014 (AY14) marks the inaugural year for the Futures Seminar - an elective course offered to resident students during the Term II elective period (Feb-Mar 2014) at the U.S. Army War College (USAWC). [...] The seminar challenged students to examine a topic relevant to the development and implementation of Army initiatives in 2025 and beyond. Through lecture, speakers, discussion and research, students developed an understanding of challenges facing the Army in 2025+ and formulated recommendations and strategies to address one singular question: 'What kind of Army will we need in 2025 and beyond?' At the end of the course students briefed their findings and recommendations, and prepared an 8-12 page paper which summarized their thoughts. This compendium contains those papers."
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership and Development
White, Samuel R., Jr.
2014
-
Futures Seminar What Kind of Army Does the Nation Need in 2035 and Beyond? Volume Six
From the Foreword: "'What kind of Army does the nation need in 2035 and beyond?' In Academic Year 2019, the Futures Seminar students and faculty, in collaboration with the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy, and Environment (ASA IEE), examined Installations of the Future. This ASA IEE initiative to think about the future roles and capabilities of Army installations provided a wide array of research topics to contribute to the ASA IEE for its consideration. The students focused their study on four areas that could impact future installations and collaborated with each other and with external organizations to help deliver their ideas to the ASA IEE. These students learned about concepts and technologies from academics and agencies within city, state and federal governments to gain understanding and appreciation of Installations of the Future."
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
White, Samuel R., Jr.
2019
-
Futures Seminar: The United States Army in 2035 and Beyond (A Compendium of U.S. Army War College Student Papers), Volume Four
From the Document: "In an effort to define what the Nation needs from its Army in 2035, it is first important to briefly describe what the future environment and threats look like. It is safe to assume that nuclear war has not occurred in 2035 and it's safe to assume that the '4+1' still remain as the nation's serious threats. However, it is possible that of the 4 main peer-peer threats, China will be diminished as a military threat. This will be due in part to the U.S. and Chinese economies being so inextricably linked as to prevent the use of force. In 2035, The Multi-Domain Battle concept will have matured into doctrine and will be trained in Army formations and tested at the Combat Training Centers. The years between now and 2035 will be a time of increased military competition. Our adversaries and allies will constantly struggle for numerical and technological superiority on the battlefield. In the year 2035, the U.S. Army will possess increased lethality, be lighter and more mobile, operate with dispersion as a norm of ground combat and will have leveraged current and future technology to gain discreet advantages over our adversaries."
Army War College (U.S.). Center for Strategic Leadership
White, Samuel R., Jr.
2017
