Advanced search    Help

Clear all search criteria

Only 2/3! You are seeing results from the Public Collection, not the complete Full Collection. Sign in to search everything (see eligibility).

• 2015 Annual Report of the Government of the United States of America for the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights Initiative

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "The U.S. government is a founding member of the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) Initiative. We joined the Steering Committee in March 2014 and are the Government Chair for the March 2015-March 2016 term. We also served on the Steering Committee from March 2009-March 2013, and as Government Chair from March 2010 to March 2011. We aspire to set the standard for excellence for government participation in the VPs Initiative, and remain committed to its mission -- to guide oil, gas, and mining companies on providing security for their operations in a manner that respects human rights; to strengthen implementation, accountability, and transparency within the Initiative; and to strengthen participation of VPs Initiative participants in all pillars. This year, we have made progress on all of these fronts -- strengthening implementation through cooperation with partners on the ground, seeking more opportunities to expand dialogue and shared learning among participants, and broadening the Initiative's participant base."

  United States. Department of State. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor

  2016-03-25
• Autonomous Undersea Vehicle Requirement for 2025, Report to Congress

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Executive Summary, "This report will describe the Navy's projected AUV [Autonomous Undersea Vehicle] inventory requirement for 2025. It will also examine the taxonomy used to cover the range of AUV classes and capabilities. It will describe the key differences between operations far forward, in open oceans, and in home waters. It will differentiate between undersea warfare missions and AUV tasks and provide an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of different host platform options for AUV employment."

  United States. Department of the Navy

  2016-02
• Extended Deterrence and Communicating Resolve

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "This article explains why US thinking about extended deterrence tends to focus on its nuclear weapons capabilities."

  Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Center for Contemporary Conflict

  Acton, James M.

  2009-12
• Security Guarantees and Extended Deterrence in the Gulf Region: A European Perspective

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "This paper outlines the European perspective on security guarantees and extended deterrence in the Persian Gulf region. The paper addresses problems and dilemmas when it comes to reinforcing extended deterrence in the Gulf."

  Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Center for Contemporary Conflict

  Tertrais, Bruno

  2009-12
• Beyond Afghanistan: Recharging European Foreign and Security Policy

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "This paper analyzes European foreign and security policy beyond Afghanistan. It argues that in order to cope with multiplicity and complexity of threats and challenges that Europe is facing when pursuing its international course, the EU will inevitably have to supplement its soft power policy with the core elements of hard power."

  Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Center for Contemporary Conflict

  Smolnikov, Sergey

  2009-12
• Evaluation of DoD's Use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Support to Civil Authorities

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "Objective[:] Our objective was to determine whether DoD policies and procedures for using DoD UAS and associated processing, exploitation, and dissemination activities comply with applicable laws, regulations, and national policies for providing support to domestic civil authorities. Finding[:] DoD is fully compliant with laws, regulations, and national policies for UAS support to domestic civil authorities."

  United States. Department of Defense. Office of the Inspector General

  2015-03-20
• Army Warfighter Information Network -- Tactical Increment 2 Procurement Quantity Not Supported for Future Army Forces

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "Objective[:] The WIN-T [Warfighter Information Network-Tactical] program is a network that distributes classified and unclassified information by voice, data, and real-time video and is the backbone of the Army's tactical communications network. Our objective was to determine whether the Army adequately justified the procurement quantity of 3,674 for the Warfighter Information Network--Tactical (WIN-T) Increment 2. Finding[:] Program Executive Office, Command, Control, Communications--Tactical (PEO C3T) officials calculated the WIN-T Increment 2 planned procurement quantity of 3,674; however, they did not support the need for the planned procurement quantity throughout the life cycle. This occurred because PEO C3T officials used an unapproved force structure for the WIN T Increment 2 planned procurement quantity, and U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command officials did not follow required processes to validate the quantity and cost in the capability production document. Additionally, the Director, Army Capabilities Integration Center, determined the Mission Command portfolio was unaffordable and unsustainable; therefore, changes to the portfolio may impact the WIN T Increment 2 planned procurement quantity. The Mission Command portfolio consists of systems that contribute to tactical and strategic communications and includes the WIN T Increment 2. As a result, the Army has no assurance the procurement of 3,674 WIN T Increment 2 units, at a cost of $9.1 billion, is necessary or valid, and is the appropriate quantity needed for future Army forces."

  United States. Department of Defense. Office of the Inspector General

  2016-03-01
• Report to Congress: Department of Defense Progress on Design and Implementation of the New DoD Personnel Management System and Appointment Procedures, As Authorized by Section 9902(a) and (b) of Title 5, United States Code

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Introduction: "The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2010, Public Law 111-84, repealed the statutory authority for the Department of Defense (DoD) National Security Personnel System and amended section 9902 of title 5, U.S. Code, to provide the Secretary of Defense authority to: (1) Promulgate agency rules and regulations, in coordination with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, providing for: (a)A new performance appraisal system that is fair, credible, and transparent; and (b Redesigned procedures for use within DoD to make appointments to positions within the competitive service in a way that supports the mission, managers, and applicants; and (2) Establish, at the Secretary's discretion, a fund to be known as the DoD Civilian Workforce Incentive Fund to incentivize DoD employees based on team or individual performance and to attract or retain employees with particular or superior qualifications or abilities. […] The Department submitted its plans for the new personnel authorities by letter dated March 29, 2013. Subsequent progress reports were submitted by letter on June 28, 2013, December 12, 2013, July 24, 2014, December 31, 2014, and June 29, 2015. This is the sixth progress report on the implementation of the authorities. This progress report covers the period of May through November 2015."

  United States. Department of Defense

  2015-12
• USCIS Automation of Immigration Benefits Processing Remains Ineffective

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "We conducted this audit to determine the effective of USCIS' [United States Citizenship and Immigration Services] efforts to automate the processing of immigration benefits. We recommended USCIS improve stakeholder involvement, implement adequate performance metrics, fully test each system release, and provide technical support to help ensure the effectiveness of its efforts to automate the processing of immigration benefits."

  United States. Department of Homeland Security. Office of Inspector General

  2016-03-09
• Underestimated: Our Not So Peaceful Nuclear Future

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the introduction: "As I continued to teach, though, I noticed another gap in the literature. The arguments policymakers and academics were making on how nuclear weapons reductions related to preventing further nuclear proliferation were, at best, uneven. Each of the basic views-official, hawkish, and academic-spotlighted some important aspect of the truth, but each was incomplete and surprisingly optimistic. [...] This brief volume covers each of these points. First, it reviews the key popular views on nuclear proliferation. Second, it considers how much worse matters might get if states continue with relatively loose nuclear constraints on civilian and military nuclear activities. Finally, it offers several policy recommendations."

  Army War College (U.S.). Strategic Studies Institute

  Sokolski, Henry D.

  2016-01
• Reforming U.S. Export Controls Reforms: Advancing U.S. Army Interests

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "The Barack Obama administration has launched an Export Control Reform (ECR) program to improve the regulations and procedures for controlling the export of U.S. weapons as well as dual-use equipment and technology. Emphasizing that international economic competitiveness is a core component of national security, the administration's stated aim is for the ECR to increase U.S. exports and jobs as well as to strengthen U.S. national security and protect U.S. military technologies. The Obama administration began by establishing an interagency task force that, unsurprisingly, concluded that the existing U.S. defense export control system-the International Traffic in Arms Regulations-is overly complicated, excessively redundant, and attempts to be too protective. The administration has since been making reforms to U.S. export controls to reduce impediments to U.S. foreign sales and partnerships, while increasing the benefits to U.S. national security through increased interoperability with stronger allies."

  Army War College (U.S.). Strategic Studies Institute

  Weitz, Richard

  2015-12
• 2017 Defense Posture Statement: Taking the Long View, Investing for the Future

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "First of all, it's evident that America is still today the world's foremost leader, partner, and underwriter of stability and security in every region across the globe, as we have been since the end of World War II. As we fulfill this enduring role, it's also evident that we're entering a new strategic era. Context is important here. A few years ago, following over a decade when we were focused on large-scale counterinsurgency operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, DoD began embarking on a major strategy shift to sustain our lead in full-spectrum warfighting. While the basic elements of our resulting defense strategy remain valid, it's also been abundantly clear to me over the last year that the world has not stood still since then-the emergence of ISIL [Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant], and the resurgence of Russia, being just the most prominent examples. This is reflective of a broader strategic transition underway, not unlike those we've seen in history following major wars. Today's security environment is dramatically different-and more diverse and complex in the scope of its challenges-than the one we've been engaged with for the last 25 years, and it requires new ways of thinking and new ways of acting."

  United States. Department of Defense

  2016-02
• Department of Defense Directive 5230.09: Clearance of DoD Information for Public Release, August 22, 2008, Certified Current Through August 22, 2015 [Incorporating Change 1, Effective March 16, 2016]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "It is DoD policy that: [a.] Accurate and timely information is made available to the public and the Congress to help the analysis and understanding of defense strategy, defense policy, and national security issues. [b.] Any official DoD information intended for public release that pertains to military matters, national security issues, or subjects of significant concern to the Department of Defense shall be reviewed for clearance prior to release."

  United States. Department of Defense

  2016-03-16
• NATO's Deterrence Challenges

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "This article is based on the workshop convened in Vilnius, Lithuania dealing with deterrence challenges facing the US and its NATO Allies. The author highlights participant discussion on the continuing importance to alliance security of US extended deterrence and the risk- and responsibility-sharing arrangements based on US nuclear weapons in Europe and allied dual-capable aircraft (DCA). He also examines the extent to which Russia might under some circumstances present a deterrence challenge for the alliance, and reviews Russian policy concerning arms control for non-strategic nuclear forces and conventional military forces."

  Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Center for Contemporary Conflict

  Yost, David S. (David Scott), 1948-

  2009-09
• Alliance Requirements for Deterrence: Capabilities and Options for the Next Decade

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "This paper considers contradictions between alliance strategic cultures and underlying strategic realities and how they might be better reconciled in the interests of improving NATO deterrence. The author argues that there is a logic of deterrence with consistent policy implications that should not be glossed over. He also assumes that there is a moral as well as an intellectual obligation to consider deterrence as a responsible strategy that could prevent reckless aggression and avoid conflict."

  Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Center for Contemporary Conflict

  Schulte, Paul, 1951-

  2009-09
• Spain, Burden-Sharing, and NATO Deterrence Policy

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "This article explores NATO deterrence policy and new Strategic Concept from the standpoint of a Non-Nuclear Weapons State (NNWS), focusing on the problems of burden-sharing and risk- and responsibility-sharing within the Atlantic alliance. The author surveys the experience of Spain. Specifically, he explains the evolution of Spanish policy regarding nuclear weapons, deterrence and burden-sharing, taking into account certain domestic implications, threat perceptions and vital and strategic interests."

  Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Center for Contemporary Conflict

  Cantalapiedra, David Garcia

  2009-09
• NATO and Tailored Deterrence: Key Workshop Findings in 2007-2008

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "This article discusses the concept of tailored deterrence and its relevance to NATO. In connection to deterrence, it details the key findings from the October 2007 workshop and from the March 2008 conference organized by the NATO Nuclear Policy Directorate, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency's Advanced Systems and Concepts Office (DTRA/ASCO) workshops in 2007-2008."

  Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Center for Contemporary Conflict

  Yost, David S. (David Scott), 1948-

  2009-09
• Prospects for U.S.-Russian Arms Control and Disarmament: A Russian Perspective

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "This article presents a Russian perspective on the prospects for US-Russia arms control and disarmament under Presidents Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev. The author examines the principle complications of US-Russian bilateral relations and the influence of NATO enlargement policy on arms control efforts."

  Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Center for Contemporary Conflict

  Oznobishchev, Sergey

  2009-09
• NATO's Future Nuclear Dimension: Managing Expectations for the Strategic Concept Debate

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "This article discusses NATO's future nuclear dimensions in the light of a new Strategic Concept. The author examines the proper balance between collective defense for the alliance due to NATO's growing number of operations and missions in different countries. He then discusses the process, timing and content of NATO's new Strategic Concept."

  Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Center for Contemporary Conflict

  Rühle, Michael

  2009-09
• Member Hearing Day, Hearing Before the U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Defense, One Hundred Fourteenth Congress, First Session, April 15, 2015

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  This testimony compilation is from the April 15, 2015 hearing on "Member Hearing Day," before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations. This hearing before the Subcommittee on Defense was scheduled for member's testimony on the Defense Appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2016. Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Alan Lowenthal, Ted Lieu, David Jolly, James McGovern, Denny Heck, Henry 'Hank' Johnson, Jeff Miller, Paul Cook, Bradley Byrne, Earl 'Buddy' Carter, Keith Rothfus, Brenda Lawrence, and Ann Wagner.

  United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations

  2015-04-15
• Terrorism Risk Insurance: Market Challenges May Exist for Current Structure and Alternative Approaches, Report to Congressional Committees

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, insurers generally stopped covering terrorism risk because losses could be too high relative to the premiums they could charge. Congress enacted TRIA [Terrorism Risk Insurance Act] to share losses from a certified act of terrorism between insurers and the government, address market disruptions, and help ensure widespread availability and affordability of terrorism coverage. TRIA does not include an up-front federal charge for the government's share of potential losses. The act mandates that, when private industry's losses are below a certain amount, the federal government recoups some or all of the federal share of losses through policyholder surcharges. The Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015 includes a provision for GAO [Government Accountability Office] to review alternative funding approaches for TRIA. Among other things, this report examines (1) how insurers manage their terrorism exposure and federal recoupment of losses, (2) how alternative funding approaches could be designed and implemented, and (3) the potential effects of these approaches as well as the current structure. To assess these funding approaches, GAO reviewed related studies, analyzed several terrorism loss scenarios for each funding approach to estimate potential effects on market participants, and interviewed industry participants. Treasury and NAIC [National Association of Insurance Commissioners] provided technical comments on a draft of this report, which GAO incorporated as appropriate. GAO also incorporated technical comments received from selected third parties, as appropriate."

  United States. Government Accountability Office

  2017-01-12
• Privacy Impact Statement for the Automated Targeting System [January 13, 2017]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Abstract: "The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) operates the Automated Targeting System (ATS). ATS is a decision support tool that compares traveler, cargo, and conveyance information against law enforcement, intelligence, and other enforcement data using risk-based scenarios and assessments. CBP is updating this Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) to notify the public about ATS user interface enhancements for passenger vetting (known as Unified Passenger or UPAX), the use of ATS for vetting new populations, vetting of master crew member list and master non-crew member list data collected under 19 CFR [Code of Federal Regulations]. 122.49c, and several new information sharing initiatives, including between the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and CBP to enhance the identification of possible threats and to assist in securing the border and transportation security."

  United States. Department of Homeland Security

  2017-01-13
• Improving the Intelligence Community's Declassification Process and the Community's Support to the National Declassification Center

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the introduction: "In accordance with a Congressionally Directed Action (CDA) in the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113‐293), the Director of National Intelligence submits this report describing 'proposals to improve the declassification review process throughout the intelligence community; and steps the intelligence community could take, or legislation that may be necessary, to enable the National Declassification Center to better accomplish the missions assigned to the Center by Executive Order 13526, Classified National Security Information, (75 Fed. Reg. 707).' The Intelligence Community's (IC's) declassification programs are foundational to the Community's fulfillment of the Executive Order (E.O.) and its own Principles of Intelligence Transparency. This report focuses on Automatic Declassification (AD), described in Section 3.3 of the Order.1 It directs that 'all classified records that are (1) more than 25 years old and (2) have been determined to have permanent historical value under title 44, United States Code, shall be automatically declassified whether or not the records have been reviewed,' except when an agency head has determined the information contained therein over which the agency has Original Classification Authority (OCA) satisfies one or more of the nine exemption categories in Section 3.3(b) of the E.O. Agencies are allowed to request exemptions from automatic declassification at 25 years (Section 3.3(b)), 50 years (Section 3.3(h)), and 75 years (Section 3.3(j)) from the date of origin of classified information if they believe it must remain protected beyond 25 years."

  United States. Office of the Director of National Intelligence

  2016-12
• NAVSEA: Campaign Plan to Expand the Advantage 2017 - 2020

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "This Campaign Plan is focused on three mission priorities: 'On-Time Delivery of Ships and Submarines, Culture of Affordability, and Cybersecurity.' These priorities address today's challenges and provide the focus to achieve our mission and support the fleet. Our mission priorities may change over time, but our foundation will always be our exceptional workforce. Our dynamic, diverse, and innovative workforce is the 'Force Behind the Fleet' and will 'Expand the Advantage' in a high velocity learning environment."

  United States. Naval Sea Systems Command

  2017
• Intelligence Community Directive 208: Maximizing the Utility of Analytic Products

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Purpose statement: "1. This Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) establishes policy for the Intelligence Community (IC) to maximize the utility of analytic products by facilitating wider dissemination and enhancing the quality of information and analysis shared. 2. This Directive supersedes ICD 208, 'Write for Maximum Utility', 17 December 2008, and rescinds Intelligence Community Policy Memorandum 2007-200-2, 'Preparing Intelligence To Meet The Intelligence Community's 'Responsibility To Provide,'' 11 December 2007."

  United States. Office of the Director of National Intelligence

  Clapper, James R. (James Robert), 1941-

  2017-01-09
• Investigation of the Chicago Police Department

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Executive Summary: "On December 7, 2015, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), Civil Rights Division, Special Litigation Section, and the United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Illinois, jointly initiated an investigation of the City of Chicago's Police Department (CPD) and the Independent Police Review Authority (IPRA). This investigation was undertaken to determine whether the Chicago Police Department is engaging in a pattern or practice of unlawful conduct and, if so, what systemic deficiencies or practices within CPD, IPRA, and the City might be facilitating or causing this pattern or practice. Our investigation assessed CPD's use of force, including deadly force, and addressed CPD policies, training, reporting, investigation, and review related to officer use of force. The investigation further addressed CPD's and IPRA's systems of accountability both as they relate to officer use of force and officer misconduct, including the intake, investigation, and review of allegations of officer misconduct, and the imposition of discipline or other corrective action. We also investigated racial, ethnic, or other disparities in CPD's force and accountability practices, and assessed how those disparities inform the breakdown in community trust. [...] This investigation was initiated as Chicago grappled with the aftermath of the release of a video showing a white police officer fatally shooting black teenager Laquan McDonald. This aftermath included protests, murder charges for the involved officer, and the resignation of Chicago's police superintendent. The McDonald incident was widely viewed as a tipping point-igniting longstanding concerns about CPD officers' use of force, and the City's systems for detecting and correcting the unlawful use of force."

  United States. Department of Justice. Civil Rights Division; United States. Department of Justice. Office of the Attorney General

  2017-01-13
• Food Safety: A National Strategy is Needed to Address Fragmentation in Federal Oversight, Report to Congressional Requesters

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "Although the U.S. food supply is generally considered safe, foodborne illness remains a common, costly, yet largely preventable public health problem. The safety and quality of food involves 16 federal agencies. For more than 4 decades, GAO [Government Accountability Office] has reported on the fragmented federal food safety oversight system. Because of potential risks to the economy and to public health and safety, food safety has remained on GAO's list of high-risk areas since 2007. GAO was asked to examine efforts toward and options for addressing fragmentation in the federal food safety oversight system. This report (1) describes the actions HHS [Department of Health and Human Services], USDA [United States Department of Agriculture], and OMB [Office of Management and Budget] have taken since 2014 to address fragmentation and evaluates the extent to which these agencies have addressed two prior GAO recommendations for government-wide planning and (2) assesses actions that food safety and other experts suggest are needed to improve the federal food safety oversight system. GAO convened an expert meeting, reviewed agency documents, and interviewed agency officials. […] GAO recommends that the appropriate entities within the EOP, in consultation with stakeholders, develop a national strategy to guide the federal food safety oversight system and address ongoing fragmentation. HHS, OMB, and the Domestic Policy Council did not comment on the recommendation. USDA disagreed with the need for a national strategy but cited factors to consider should changes be proposed. GAO believes the recommendation should be implemented."

  United States. Government Accountability Office

  2017-01-13
• Privacy Impact Assessment for the DHS Employee Collaboration Tools

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Abstract: "The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) employs various cloud-based services and employee collaboration tools to promote efficiency and improve content management and employee communication across the enterprise. DHS cloud-based services and tools are used by the Department and departmental programs that do not have other content tracking systems to more effectively and efficiently manage the receipt, creation, assignment, tracking, and storage of agency matters. DHS is conducting this Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) because cloud-based content management solutions and employee collaboration tools collect, use, store, and disseminate personally identifiable information (PII) and sensitive PII (SPII)."

  United States. Department of Homeland Security

  2017-02-07
• DoD Instruction 1250.22: Employer Support of the Coast Guard and Reserve (EGSR), February 6, 2017

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "Purpose: This issuance, in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive 5124.02, establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures for: [1] Staffing ESGR. [2] Developing programs that promote employer and community support for the operational missions and activities of Reserve Component (RC) members. [3] Conducting recurring employer relations training of RC members, in accordance with DoD Instruction (DoDI) 1205.12."

  United States. Department of Defense

  2017-02-06
• National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling: The Gulf Spill [Interactive Presentation]

  Show summary     Open resource [html]     (open full abstract)

  "On April 20, 2010 an explosion tore through the Deepwater Horizon, an oil rig operating in the Gulf of Mexico. The disaster happened as workers were finalizing the drilling of the exploratory Macondo well, forty miles off the coast of Louisiana. It was, by any standard, a catastrophe. Click the tabs above to choose a chapter to explore the issues and access deeper analysis."

  United States. National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling

  2014