Advanced search    Help

Clear all search criteria

Only 2/3! You are seeing results from the Public Collection, not the complete Full Collection. Sign in to search everything (see eligibility).

• Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate: H.R. 5005, Homeland Security Act of 2002

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Summary: "H.R. 5005 would establish the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to prevent terrorist attacks within the United States, reduce the United States' vulnerability to terrorism, minimize the damages from attacks that occur, and help to recover from any attacks. The new department would consist of 30 existing federal agencies or portions of agencies. Each of these agencies would continue to be responsible for carrying out its other, non homeland-security functions. Enacting H.R. 5005 would increase direct spending from federal retirement funds by about $1 million in 2003 and by $5 million over the 2003-2012 period. Therefore, pay-as-you-go procedures would apply. The bill also could affect governmental receipts from import duties and from employee contributions to federal retirement funds, but CBO [Congressional Budget Office] estimates that the amounts would be less than $500,000 annually. H.R. 5005 contains intergovernmental mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), but CBO estimates that the costs to comply with the mandates would not exceed the threshold established in that act ($58 million in 2002, adjusted annually for inflation). The bill contains no new private-sector mandates as defined in UMRA."

  United States. Congressional Budget Office

  2002-07-23
• Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate: H.R. 4864, Anti-Terrorism Explosives Act of 2002

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Summary: "H.R. 4864 would require all purchasers of explosives to obtain permits from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) and would direct that agency to perform background checks on persons who work with explosives. The bill also would require manufacturers and importers of explosive materials or ammonium nitrate to furnish samples and other information to the ATF. Finally, H.R. 4864 would expand the current prohibitions on possession of explosives and would establish new federal crimes for offenses relating to misuse of explosives. CBO [Congressional Budget Office] estimates that implementing H.R. 4864 would cost about $190 million over H.R. 4864 would require all purchasers of explosives to obtain permits from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) and would direct that agency to perform background checks on persons who work with explosives. The bill also would require manufacturers and importers of explosive materials or ammonium nitrate to furnish samples and other information to the ATF. Finally, H.R. 4864 would expand the current prohibitions on possession of explosives and would establish new federal crimes for offenses relating to misuse of explosives."

  United States. Congressional Budget Office

  2002-08-09
• Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate: S. 2037, Science and Technology Emergency Mobilization Act

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Summary: "S. 2037 would authorize the President to establish a national emergency technology guard and a national clearinghouse for emergency prevention and response technology. In addition, the bill would authorize the implementation of a pilot program in seven states to make the communications systems used by fire, law enforcement, and emergency preparedness and response agencies compatible. Assuming appropriation of the necessary amounts, CBO [Congressional Budget Office] estimates that implementing the bill would cost $70 million over the 2003-2007 period. S. 2037 would not affect direct spending or receipts; therefore, pay-as-you-go procedures would not apply. S. 2037 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) and would provide $35 million in grants to states in fiscal year 2003 for pilot programs designed to plan and implement interoperable communications systems."

  United States. Congressional Budget Office

  2002-05-29
• Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate: S. 2452, National Homeland Security and Combating Terrorism Act of 2002

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Summary: "S. 2452 would establish a new cabinet department, the Department of National Homeland Security, to plan, coordinate, and integrate the government's activities relating to homeland security, including border security, the protection of critical infrastructure, and emergency preparedness. The legislation would combine several existing agencies to form the new department. S. 2452 also would establish a National Office for Combating Terrorism within the Executive Office of the President to coordinate threat assessments, to craft and oversee a National Strategy to Combat Terrorism, and to plan and coordinate the budget to combat terrorism. Finally, the legislation would authorize the appropriation of $200 million for fiscal year 2003 to develop technology to combat terrorism and $5 million annually over the 2003-2005 period for emergency preparedness pilot programs."

  United States. Congressional Budget Office

  2002-06-17
• Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate: H.R. 4635, Arming Pilots Against Terrorism Act

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Summary: "H.R. 4635 would direct the Under Secretary of Transportation for Security to establish a program for training and equipping commercial aviation pilots as federal flight deck officers. The Under Secretary would authorize the officers to carry firearms. H.R. 4635 also contains a private-sector mandate as defined in UMRA. The bill would require air carriers to provide additional training, including self-defense training, to their crews. Because the new training requirements would depend on specific regulations that would be established by the Under Secretary, CBO [Congressional Budget Office] cannot determine whether the direct cost to the private sector would exceed the annual threshold specified in UMRA ($115 million in 2002, adjusted annually for inflation)."

  United States. Congressional Budget Office

  2002-07-08
• Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate: H.R. 3173, Servicemembers and Military Families Financial Protection Act of 2001

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "H.R. 3173 would increase the maximum amount of insurance coverage available to members of the armed services, and would amend the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940 (SSCRA) by increasing the maximum rent payment that active-duty servicemembers can make and still be protected from eviction. CBO [Congressional Budget Office] estimates that enacting this bill could increase direct spending for insurance payments, but CBO cannot provide a specific estimate. Because this bill could affect direct spending, pay-as-you-go procedures would apply. H.R. 3173 would increase the maximum amount of insurance coverage available to members of the armed forces under the Servicemembers Group Life Insurance (SGLI) program. The SGLI program is wholly funded by premiums paid by servicemembers but current law provides for reimbursements to the SGLI trust fund by the armed services should mortality rates exceed certain levels that are based on the mortality rates from the previous three years. 3173 also would amend the SSCRA by increasing the maximum rent payment that active-duty servicemembers can make and still be protected from eviction. Under current law, active-duty servicemembers and their dependents have a temporary reprieve from eviction for nonpayment of rent. To proceed with an eviction, a landlord must obtain a court order authorizing the eviction. Section 2 of this bill would increase to $1,950 the maximum monthly rent a servicemember can pay and still be afforded this protection. CBO estimates that implementing this section would have no impact on federal spending. H.R. 3173 contains a private-sector mandate as defined by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)."

  United States. Congressional Budget Office

  2002-06-10
• Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate: H.R. 4547, Cost of War Against Terrorism Authorization Act of 2002

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Summary: "H.R. 4547 would authorize appropriations totaling $10 billion for fiscal year 2003 for the Department of Defense (DoD) for the conduct of operations in continuation of the war on terrorism. It also contains several provisions that would affect military compensation and that would establish additional teams within the Army National Guard to provide support to civil authorities in the event of an attack involving a weapon of mass destruction. CBO [Congressional Budget Office] estimates that appropriation of the authorized amounts for 2003 would result in additional outlays of $9.9 billion over the 2003-2007 period. The bill also contains provisions that would raise the costs of discretionary defense programs over the 2004-2007 period. CBO estimates that those provisions would require additional appropriations of $965 million over those four years.'"

  United States. Congressional Budget Office

  2002-07-22
• Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate: H.R. 3609, Pipeline Infrastructure Protection to Enhance Security and Safety Act

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Summary: "Under current law, the Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA) within the Department of Transportation (DOT) oversees the safety of pipelines that carry either gas or hazardous liquids and provides grants to states for safety programs. For these activities, H.R. 3609 would authorize a gross appropriation of $282 million over the 2003-2006 period. In addition, H.R. 3609 would authorize the appropriation of $80 million over the 2003-2006 period for a new research program to improve pipeline inspection techniques, risk assessments, and technology to detect leaks. The bill also would authorize the appropriation of almost $6 million over the 2003-2006 period for grants to state programs that help excavators coordinate their work with the operators of underground pipelines, and another $4 million over the 2003-2006 period for grants to local communities to improve pipeline safety. Assuming appropriation of the authorized amounts, CBO [Congressional Budget Office] estimates that implementing H.R. 3609 would have a net cost of $141 million over the 2003-2007 period. Enacting H.R. 3609 also would affect governmental receipts, so pay-as-you-go procedures would apply, but CBO estimates that such effects would not be significant. H.R. 3609 contains both intergovernmental and private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA). The bill also would authorize grants to states to reimburse up to 50 percent of the cost of state pipeline safety programs."

  United States. Congressional Budget Office

  2002-07-23
• Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate: H.R. 3448, Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Summary: "H.R. 3448, enacted as Public Law 107-188, provides the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Agriculture with new authorities to regulate the possession, use, and transfer of certain biological agents and toxins. The act includes assessments of civil penalties of up to $500,000 for violations of the regulations. In addition, the act creates criminal penalties for unlawful possession and unauthorized transfers of certain biological agents and toxins. Violators can be fined or imprisoned for up to five years, or both. The new criminal penalties will be deposited as revenues into the Crime Victims Fund and spent in subsequent years as direct spending. CBO [Congressional Budget Office] estimates that the increase in civil and criminal penalties will not be significant in any year."

  United States. Congressional Budget Office

  2002-07-08
• Congressional Budget Office Pay-As-You-Go Estimate: H.R. 3525, Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "CBO [Congressional Budget Office] estimates that H.R. 3525 (enacted as Public Law 107-173) will result in no significant net cost to the federal government. The act will affect direct spending, but we estimate that any net effects will not be significant. H.R. 3525 sets the amount of the machine-readable visa (MRV) fee at $65 and establishes a surcharge of $10 for issuing an MRV in a nonmachine-readable passport. Under prior law, the Secretary of State had the authority to raise MRV fees at his discretion, and on June 1, 2002, the department implemented a new schedule of consular fees, including an increase in the MRV fee from $45 to $65. According to the State Department, it would be nearly impossible to collect the $10 surcharge under the existing application procedures because banks that collect various application fees would be unable to distinguish machine-readable passports from nonmachine-readable ones. Because the State Department currently does not have a specific plan for collecting the new surcharge, CBO cannot estimate the additional amounts that will be collected and spent, but the net effects will not be significant in any year. H.R. 3525 also will increase the penalty from $300 to $1,000 for improper submission of passenger manifests by carriers entering United States ports. This provision will increase both collections and spending of such penalties by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), but CBO estimates that the net effect will be less than $500,000 annually."

  United States. Congressional Budget Office

  2002-08-01
• Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate: S. 2664, First Responder Terrorism Preparedness Act of 2002

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Summary: "S. 2664 would authorize grants to states to help first responders prepare for terrorist incidents, authorize grants to urban search and rescue task forces, require the President to provide public education and conduct ongoing studies of harmful substances at disaster sites, and establish an Office of National Preparedness within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)."

  United States. Congressional Budget Office

  2002-09-06
• Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate: H.R. 3880, A Bill to Provide a Temporary Waiver from Certain Transportation Conformity Requirements and Metropolitan Transportation Planning Requirements Under the Clean Air Act and Under Other Laws for Certain Areas in New York Where the Planning Offices and Resources Have Been Destroyed by Acts of Terrorism

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  "H.R. 3880 would waive certain Clean Air Act provisions that require transportation programs to conform with approved state air quality plans in order to receive federal funding until September 30, 2005, for certain areas in the state of New York. This legislation also would exempt certain areas of New York (until September 30, 2005) from several reporting requirements under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century. Based on information from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Transportation, CBO [Congressional Budget Office] estimates that enacting H.R. 3880 would not have a significant effect on the federal budget. Without the waiver from current law that is contained in this legislation, it is possible that New York City would become ineligible to receive certain federal transportation funds. In that event, such funds would be spent on transportation projects in other areas of the state. Because the bill would not affect direct spending or receipts, pay-as-you-go procedures would not apply. H.R. 3880 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and would impose no costs on state or local governments. Overall, the bill would benefit both the state of New York and New York City by preserving the flow of federal highway funding. If the reporting requirements under current law were not met, the New York metropolitan region could lose as much as $1 billion in funding for certain highway and transit projects during fiscal years 2003 and 2004."

  United States. Congressional Budget Office

  2002-09-06
• CBO Study: Federal Reinsurance for Disasters

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Summary and Introduction: "The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, inflicted enormous personal and property losses on the United States. Insurance payments for economic losses on that day will surpass $30 billion and could top $50 billion. Among the many adverse economic effects that resulted from the attacks is a continuing shortage of insurance against losses of property from terrorism. Coverage is difficult to obtain, especially for buildings or sites that are landmarks; where coverage is available, prices are high and restrictions are numerous. Policymakers have developed two types of federal proposals to increase the supply of property and casualty insurance. Under one set of options, which was created following Hurricane Andrew in August 1992 and the Northridge earthquake in January 1994, the federal government would auction reinsurance contracts to primary insurance companies and state-sponsored insurers. Reinsurance is an established practice among private insurers. By buying reinsurance, primary insurers spread the risk of loss more widely and strengthen their ability to insure against catastrophes. The intent of those proposals is to offer federal reinsurance when coverage is in short supply, at market prices that are expected to cover the government's costs. By contrast, under proposals developed since September 11, the government would pay for most losses from a terrorist attack directly, without reimbursement or with only partial reimbursement. Even though one type of proposal was created in response to natural disasters and the other from an act of terrorism, both types could be considered viable alternatives, whatever the source of catastrophic loss."

  United States. Congressional Budget Office

  2002-09
• Statement on Federal Assistance for Maine [March 14, 2005]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  President Bush orders federal aid to supplement local recovery efforts following record snowfall in January 2005.

  United States. Office of the White House Press Secretary

  2005-03-14
• Statement on Federal Assistance for Alaska [March 14, 2005]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  President Bush orders federal aid to supplement local recovery efforts in Alaska following damage done by a severe storm in January 2005.

  United States. Office of the White House Press Secretary

  2005-03-14
• Statement on Federal Assistance for Utah [February 2, 2005]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  President Bush orders federal aid to supplement local recovery efforts in Utah following severe storms and flooding in January 2005.

  United States. Office of the White House Press Secretary

  2005-02-02
• Statement on Federal Disaster Assistance for Missouri [September 21, 2007]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Document: "The President today declared a major disaster exists in the State of Missouri and ordered Federal aid to supplement State and local recovery efforts in the area struck by severe storms and flooding during the period of August 19-21, 2007. Federal funding is available to State and eligible local governments and certain private nonprofit organizations on a cost-sharing basis for emergency work and the repair or replacement of facilities damaged by the severe storms and flooding in the counties of Dade, Dallas, Greene, Laclede, Lawrence, Polk, and Webster. Federal funding is also available on a cost-sharing basis for hazard mitigation measures statewide. R. David Paulison, Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Department of Homeland Security, named Michael L. Parker as the Federal Coordinating Officer for Federal recovery operations in the affected area. FEMA said additional designations may be made at a later date if requested by the State and warranted by the results of further damage assessments."

  United States. Office of the White House Press Secretary

  2007-09-21
• Statement by the Press Secretary: President Declares Disaster in Ohio [March 23, 2007]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  President Bush declares a major disaster exists in Ohio and orders federal aid to supplement local recovery efforts following damage done by record snowfall and severe winter storms.

  United States. Office of the White House Press Secretary

  2007-03-23
• Budget Hearing-National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Before the U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies, One Hundred and Fourteenth Congress, First Session, March 4, 2015

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  This following hearing compilation is from the March 4, 2015, titled, "Budget Hearing-National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA]." The following statement is from the witness, Charles F. Bolden: "The FY [Fiscal Year] 2016 request includes $4,505.9 million for Exploration with $2,862.9 million for Exploration Systems Development, $1,243.8 million for Commercial Space Flight, and $399.2 million for Exploration Research and Development. This funding, with critical investment from each of NASA's mission directorates, supports NASA's [National Aeronautics and Space Administration] plans to, as the President said in his State of the Union speech, continue our journey to Mars and push 'out into the solar system not just to visit, but to stay[.]' NASA has made tremendous progress on this journey, and we will continue to progress, with building momentum, through the years to come. As part of our strategic, stepping stone approach to deep-space explorations, NASA is facilitating the development of a U.S. commercial crew transportation capability with the goal of launching NASA astronauts from American soil in the next couple of years. This initiative to facilitate the success of U.S. industry to provide crew transportation to low Earth orbit will end our sole reliance on Russia and ensure that we have safe, reliable and cost-effective access to the ISS [International Space Station] and low-Earth orbit. Commercial Products Contracts allowed potential providers to better understand and align with NASA human spaceflight requirements and gave NASA early insight into vehicle designs and approaches. NASA has now entered the development and certification phase with the award of two FAR-based, fixed-price Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (CCtCap) contracts to American companies to transport our Astronauts to and from the ISS. SpaceX and Boeing have laid out milestones with the goal of certified commercial crew capability in 2017. The contractors are committed and at work. Our approach has emphasized competition and redundancy to ensure that NASA's human safety and certification requirements are met, we achieve the best value for the American taxpayer, and we end our sole reliance on Russia for transportation services. Now, we need the funding necessary to execute this plan to completion. With continued support from the Congress, crews will again launch to the ISS from American soil by 2017." Statements, letters and other materials submitted for the record are from the following: Charles F. Bolden.

  United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations

  2015-03-04
• Fact Sheet: Administration's Legislation to Create Military Commissions [September 6, 2006]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Document: "Today, the administration submitted draft legislation to create a strong and effective military commission structure. This structure will help meet the President's objective of winning the War on Terror and ensuring terrorists can be prosecuted for their crimes in full and fair trials. Detaining, questioning, and, where appropriate, prosecuting enemy combatants for war crimes and other terrorism-related offenses is critical to protecting our Nation and winning the War on Terror."

  United States. Office of the White House Press Secretary

  2006-09-06
• President Bush Commends Interagency Task Force on Returning Global War on Terror Heroes [April 24, 2007]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  From the Document: "The brave men and women who have volunteered to protect and defend our country deserve to receive the highest level of support from our grateful nation. Today, Secretary of Veterans Affairs Jim Nicholson and members of the Interagency Task Force on Returning Global War on Terror Heroes released a government-wide action plan that sets out steps to improve our care for America's troops and veterans. The Task Force has proposed specific recommendations to immediately begin addressing the problems and gaps in services that were identified across the veterans and military healthcare systems. These recommendations include directing the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to develop a joint process for disability determination. Additionally, I have asked Secretary Nicholson to communicate directly with the members of the Commission on Care for America's Returning Wounded Warriors to ensure that both groups exchange ideas and information that will efficiently advance reform efforts. I commend the work of the Task Force, welcome its recommendations, and have directed Secretary Nicholson to work with all agencies involved on the recommendations and to report back to me within 45 days on how these measures are being implemented."

  United States. Office of the White House Press Secretary

  Bush, George W. (George Walker), 1946-

  2007-04-24
• Opportunities for a Private and Competitive Sustainable Flood Insurance Market, Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Housing and Insurance of the Committee on Financial Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, Second Session, November 19, 2014

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  This is from the November 19, 2014 hearing, "Opportunities for a Private and Competitive Sustainable Flood Insurance Market," before the U.S. House Committee on Financial Services, Subcommittee on Housing and Insurance. From the testimony of Don Brown: "When the NFIP [National Flood Insurance Program] was established, flood was generally considered an uninsurable peril and few private companies were willing to write the risk. There was no loss history, no models for flood, and generally the insured knew much more about their potential for loss than the insurance company. Flood is no longer an uninsurable risk and the private market is no longer unwilling to write flood. Just the opposite is true. There are several reasons for this development. In the last few years, commercial flood models have been developed that, along with mapping and geocoding technologies, have given insurance companies a wealth of information regarding flood risk. There's been an influx of capital into the reinsurance and insurance arena -- and that capital is interested in underwriting flood risk. These developments provide new options for consumers when buying flood insurance." Statements, letters and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Steve Ellis, Jordan Gray and Don Brown.

  United States. Government Publishing Office

  2015
• Examining USDA Organization and Program Administration - Part I, Hearing Before the House Committee on Agriculture, One Hundred Fourteenth Congress, Second Session, March 17, 2016

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  This is a testimony compilation of the March 17, 2016 hearing "Examining USDA Organization and Program Administration - Part I" held before the House Committee on Agriculture. From the opening statement of Michael Conway: "The primary purpose behind these hearings is to connect the members of this committee with the full bench at USDA. It provides an opportunity for our members to see--in one setting--how all of the various pieces of USDA fit together. It is an opportunity for our members to gain an even stronger understanding of the policies and issues they focus on by getting under the hood to see how all, or at least more, of the parts work. It is also an opportunity for our witnesses to gain a better understanding of our responsibilities and the issues and policies our constituents care about. In short, this is a good opportunity for constructive dialogue between members of this committee and the Department." Statements, letters, and materials submitted for the record include those of the following: Michael Conway, Kevin Concannon, Alfred Almanza, and Liza Mensah

  United States. Congress. House. Committee on Agriculture

  2016-03-17
• Statement on Federal Assistance for Kansas [February 9, 2005]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  President Bush orders federal aid to supplement local recovery efforts in Kansas following severe winter storms and flooding in January 2005.

  United States. Office of the White House Press Secretary

  2005-02-09
• Statement on Federal Assistance for Kentucky [February 9, 2005]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  President Bush orders federal aid to supplement local recovery efforts in Kentucky following a severe winter storm and record snow fall in December 2004.

  United States. Office of the White House Press Secretary

  2005-02-09
• President Bush Discusses the Global War on Terror in Tipp City, Ohio [April 19, 2007]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  President Bush discusses the effects of September 11th and the progress being made in the Global War on Terror.

  United States. Office of the White House Press Secretary

  Bush, George W. (George Walker), 1946-

  2007-04-19
• Remarks by the President at United Nation's Secretary General Luncheon [September 12, 2002]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  These are remarks by President Bush at the opening of the 57th session of the U.N. General Assembly. Bush thanks the U.N. and every person and nation who has joined the fight against global terrorism.

  United States. Office of the White House Press Secretary

  Bush, George W. (George Walker), 1946-

  2002-09-12
• President Bush Discusses Economy, War on Terror During Remarks to the National Cattlemen's Beef Association [March 28, 2007]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  President Bush discusses the economy, the War on Terror, and national security during remarks to the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, March 28, 2007.

  United States. Office of the White House Press Secretary

  Bush, George W. (George Walker), 1946-

  2007-03-28
• President Condemn Terrorist Attacks in Sharm el Sheikh Egypt [July 23, 2005]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  President Bush speaks out against the terrorist attacks in Sharm el Sheikh.

  United States. Office of the White House Press Secretary

  2005-07-23
• VP Remarks at the AEI Annual Dinner [February 12, 2004]

  Show summary     Open resource [pdf]     (open full abstract)

  On February 12, 2004, the White House issued this release of Vice President Cheney's remarks at the American Enterprise Institute annual dinner. At the end of his remarks, the Vice President discussed 9/11 and the war on terror.

  United States. Office of the White House Press Secretary

  2004-02-12