Critical Releases in Homeland Security: April 26, 2017
Every two weeks, the HSDL identifies a brief, targeted collection of recently released documents of particular interest or potential importance. We post the collection on the site and email it to subscribers. Click here to subscribe. (You must have an individual account in order to subscribe.)
5 featured resources updated Apr 26, 2017
-
Cognitive Defense: Influencing the Target Choices of Less Sophisticated Threat Actors
"With the emergence of non-state threats and new operating environments since the end of the Cold War, the relevance of deterrence as a security tool has repeatedly been called into doubt. Modern adversaries often lack territory, militaries, economies, or even identities to threaten and retaliate against. Their motivations are diverse and they are increasingly selecting soft targets on the basis of opportunity. Governments can no longer be relied upon as they once were to deter attacks against the homeland, shifting the burden of deterrence downward to the private and public parties being targeted. Alternative approaches are needed that account for this fundamental change. Taking inspiration from criminology and behavioral economics, we identify ways in which cognitive biases can be manipulated to
affect adversary target preferences and then explore how this approach can be used to aid defenders on the ground."
Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Center for Homeland Defense and Security
Wasson, Jesse; Bluesteen, Christopher
2017-04
-
Coordination in Crises: Implementation of the National Incident Management System by Surface Transportation Agencies
"For more than a decade, the National Incident Management System (NIMS) has served in the United States as the mandated framework for coordinated organization, operational command, and implementation of response to emergencies nationwide. This article examines whether surface transportation agencies are developing the capabilities necessary to fit effectively into NIMS. It reviews the literature on NIMS, focusing on its implementation in 'second and third circle responder' professions, including transportation, rather than in traditional first responder fields such as police, fire, EMS [emergency medical services], and emergency management. The article also reports on exploratory interviews with city, metro, state, and federal transportation officials about the extent of NIMS implementation and the factors that facilitate or impede its use. Finally, we present a consolidated conceptual model of factors influencing NIMS implementation and make recommendations about how to enhance NIMS use in the transportation sector."
Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Center for Homeland Defense and Security
Hambridge, Nicholas B.; Howitt, Arnold M., 1947-; Giles, David W.
2017-04
-
Countering Violent Extremism: Actions Needed to Define Strategy and Assess Progress of Federal Efforts, Report to Congressional Requesters
"Violent extremism--generally defined as ideologically, religious, or politically-motivated acts of violence--has been perpetrated in the United States by white supremacists, anti-government groups, and radical Islamist entities, among others. In 2011, the U.S. government developed a national strategy and SIP for CVE aimed at providing information and resources to communities. In 2016, an interagency CVE Task Force led by DHS and DOJ was created to coordinate CVE efforts. GAO was asked to review domestic federal CVE efforts. This report addresses the extent to which (1) DHS, DOJ, and other key stakeholders tasked with CVE in the United States have implemented the 2011 SIP and (2) the federal government has developed a strategy to implement CVE activities, and the CVE Task Force has assessed progress. GAO assessed the status of activities in the 2011 SIP; interviewed officials from agencies leading CVE efforts and a non-generalizable group of community-based entities selected from cities with CVE frameworks; and compared Task Force activities to selected best practices for multi- agency efforts. [...] GAO recommends that DHS and DOJ direct the CVE Task Force to (1) develop a cohesive strategy with measurable outcomes and (2) establish a process to assess the overall progress of CVE efforts. DHS and DOJ concurred with both recommendations and DHS described the CVE Task Force's planned actions for implementation."
United States. Government Accountability Office
2017-04-06
Previous releases: May 4, 2022 | April 20, 2022 | April 6, 2022 | March 23, 2022 | March 9, 2022 | February 23, 2022 | February 9, 2022 | January 26, 2022 | January 12, 2022 | December 29, 2021 | December 15, 2021 | December 1, 2021 | November 17, 2021 | November 3, 2021 | October 20, 2021 | older ...